...::: SFL Poll results and conclusions :::...

"
Xavderion wrote:

He's just mad that we are right about the poll being statistically irrelevant.


You mad about losing the statistically irrelevant poll?
"
Xavderion wrote:


He's just mad that we are right about the poll being statistically irrelevant.



If it comforts you to look things that way go right ahead, you have my full permission.
IGN STD Ajax_Deadeye| Nathaniel_Corwin| Itane_Shira| Tetra_Mayani| Arkanis_Gath
[Build] TK's CoC Crit Shadow aka THE WELDER /view-thread/787487
[Shop] TK's Adventurers Pawnshop /view-thread/570071
"
Kilgamesh wrote:
"
Xavderion wrote:

He's just mad that we are right about the poll being statistically irrelevant.


You mad about losing the statistically irrelevant poll?


No, that would be silly.
GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
"
Thorien_Kell wrote:
"
Xavderion wrote:


"What I meant is you need an unbiased/representative data sample of the statistical population (which is all players of the game). This certainly wasn't given in the poll thread, since mostly people interested in a SFL entered the thread and voted for it..


Of course, poll was only for people actually willing to respond, how ingenious of you to point out that. Btw it's the same principle we elect our governments and they found it legit, aren't they? So system good enough for picking country leaders but not up to your high standards?



That's the worst comparison ever. This poll and presidential elections don't have anything in common.
GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
Keep people pushing, sooner GGG understands the problem, the better. Fact that this thread and any similar threads like this has so many views and replays says it is very popular and a lot of people are interested in it.
The problem? I don't think there is a problem. People want stuff they shouldn't have. They always will. The only problem would be if GGG started listening to them.
"
Shagsbeard wrote:
The problem? I don't think there is a problem. People want stuff they shouldn't have. They always will. The only problem would be if GGG started listening to them.



I know it's hard to believe that people might have opinions and preferences different from your own, but please try to be understanding.
"
Shagsbeard wrote:
The problem? I don't think there is a problem. People want stuff they shouldn't have. They always will. The only problem would be if GGG started listening to them.


You honestly think thats why everyone wants a SFL? I already have everything I want lol
Standard Forever
"
Shagsbeard wrote:
The problem? I don't think there is a problem. People want stuff they shouldn't have. They always will. The only problem would be if GGG started listening to them.
I'm against adding a SFL because you can already play it in any league if you don't trade.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info