Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support DONE!!!!!

"
Slicer9875 wrote:
Has anyone thought it might be better to form a Google Doc and put all the people who hate the lab,i n favor of possibly changing the lab or want to decouple the ascendancy points from the lab on there instead of just noting it in the forums. It would be far easier to see and would just be one click away instead of jumping to different pages in the thread.


I've never used Google Doc. I guess it would allow me to log on using my gmail/google login in order to allow only me to modify the list?
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
"
Turtledove wrote:
"
Slicer9875 wrote:
Has anyone thought it might be better to form a Google Doc and put all the people who hate the lab,i n favor of possibly changing the lab or want to decouple the ascendancy points from the lab on there instead of just noting it in the forums. It would be far easier to see and would just be one click away instead of jumping to different pages in the thread.


I've never used Google Doc. I guess it would allow me to log on using my gmail/google login in order to allow only me to modify the list?


I meant using a Google Doc within Google Drive. Yeah, you can share that particular document in your Google Drive anonymously while making sure you're the only person who can modify the list while everyone else will still be able to read the list.

Just confirmed that you can do this by setting the option for anybody who has the link to be able to access it and specify view only.
Last edited by Slicer9875#6180 on Jun 4, 2017, 6:38:44 PM
"
Slicer9875 wrote:
"
Turtledove wrote:
"
Slicer9875 wrote:
Has anyone thought it might be better to form a Google Doc and put all the people who hate the lab,i n favor of possibly changing the lab or want to decouple the ascendancy points from the lab on there instead of just noting it in the forums. It would be far easier to see and would just be one click away instead of jumping to different pages in the thread.


I've never used Google Doc. I guess it would allow me to log on using my gmail/google login in order to allow only me to modify the list?


I meant using a Google Doc within Google Drive. Yeah, you can share that particular document in your Google Drive anonymously while making sure you're the only person who can modify the list while everyone else will still be able to read the list.

Just confirmed that you can do this by setting the option for anybody who has the link to be able to access it and specify view only.


Thanks

edit: Okay, I switched to using Google Doc for storage of the account name list.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
Last edited by Turtledove#4014 on Jun 4, 2017, 9:10:12 PM
I just don't see why ascendary points can't be earned in another way..

Removing points from labyrinth, will have practically no effect on people running labyrinth because there's still enchants and treasure chests to be gotten, why are offerings worth around 6 chaos? Because people want to run lab for the enchants/chests, literally no one runs lab just to have the enjoyment of running labyrinth.

If ascendary points were something small like 5-10% damage increase nodes then I could understand the logic of "Don't like it, then don't run it you don't have to.", but we are talking about game changing nodes that are essentially mandatory to most builds.

Most people who say they like the labyrinth probably mean they like the fat loot and money to be made doing it, I hardly believe people honestly enjoy the long walk though the giant maze of weakling enemies,finding golden keys, backtracking and the traps designed to make the whole thing even longer.

Changing the way points are acquired could only be positive, there is no negative down side, because people will never stop running labyrinth so long as enchants and chests exist.

And before people respond with "Lab hater!", well it's true I don't like the labyrinth, but I'm not asking for it to be removed, you can run your labyrinth as much as you like, I really don't mind, but the points should be acquired elsewhere.



tl;dr the labyrinth itself isn't fun, the loot is. So keep the loot, but remove the points to be gotten elsewhere
"
Spawnova wrote:
tl;dr the labyrinth itself isn't fun, the loot is. So keep the loot, but remove the points to be gotten elsewhere
Couldn't you just as easily say:
tl;dr the labyrinth itself isn't fun, the ascendency points are. So keep the ascendency points, but remove the loot to be gotten elsewhere
Guild Leader The Amazon Basin <BASIN>
Play Nice and Show Some Class www.theamazonbasin.com
"
mark1030 wrote:
"
Spawnova wrote:
tl;dr the labyrinth itself isn't fun, the loot is. So keep the loot, but remove the points to be gotten elsewhere
Couldn't you just as easily say:
tl;dr the labyrinth itself isn't fun, the ascendency points are. So keep the ascendency points, but remove the loot to be gotten elsewhere


That would only bother people that run Labyrinth for the loot rather for than the Ascendancy point. So it would seem like it wouldn't make people disliking the horrible labyrinth game play happy. It would only make the people willing to run through the labyrinth for the loot unhappy.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
I like the labyrint, and would like to see some traps outside of it.
IGN: Toxic_Artillery

Obey the Orb:
https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2161077/page/1
"
IsodorRodosi wrote:
I like the labyrint, and would like to see some traps outside of it.


Traps mixed with monsters is still "kill-monsters-get-loot" game play and great PoE fun. When a game consists of screens full of nothing but traps then it is "platformer-jump-here-run-there" game play. The labyrinth game play is a very poor and inferior example of this "platformer-jump-here-hop-there" game play.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
"
Turtledove wrote:
"
IsodorRodosi wrote:
I like the labyrint, and would like to see some traps outside of it.


Traps mixed with monsters is still "kill-monsters-get-loot" game play and great PoE fun. When a game consists of screens full of nothing but traps then it is "platformer-jump-here-run-there" game play. The labyrinth game play is a very poor and inferior example of this "platformer-jump-here-hop-there" game play.


I guess all you see when you pay your way through labs all the time is labs without mobs, so I guess that makes sense.

For those of us that play the real game though, yes indeed, Lab is a great mix of monsters and traps.
Carry on my waypoint son, there'll be peace when maps are done.
Lay your portal gem to rest, don't you die no more.

'Cause it's a bitter sweet symphony this league.
Try to make maps meet, you're a slave to the meta, then you leave.
"
Xavathos wrote:
I guess all you see when you pay your way through labs all the time is labs without mobs, so I guess that makes sense.

For those of us that play the real game though, yes indeed, Lab is a great mix of monsters and traps.

There is a severe imbalance between monster "challenge" and trap challenge. Monsters are there to get flask charges and endurance charges for making traps easier. So I dont consider this a "great mix".

You can speak for yourself if you want but your use of "us..." makes your claim/s wrong.
No wonder it's lost, it's in the middle of the jungle!

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info