Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support DONE!!!!!

"

Albinosaurus wrote:

"

GeorgAnatoly wrote:

If risk/reward isn't considered then why do you want them behind malachai? Why not just get them automatically every tenth level?

I wouldn't mind that solution either, but like I said, I'm going for a compromise here. I also stated why putting it behind Malachai would be a good choice. Not sure if you're arguing just to argue, or if you're actually reading what I wrote.

"

XerxezBreak wrote:

The problem people find with Labyrinth is it requires a thought process which most Path of Exile players have lost or never had to begin with.

Incorporating a puzzle into the game gives players time to think about their next move rather than become mindless zombies.

This is why Labyrinth is one of the greatest features to the game, it gives players an opportunity to use their brain!

"

GeorgAnatoly wrote:

"

Albinosaurus wrote:

"

GeorgAnatoly wrote:

If risk/reward isn't considered then why do you want them behind malachai? Why not just get them automatically every tenth level?

I wouldn't mind that solution either, but like I said, I'm going for a compromise here. I also stated why putting it behind Malachai would be a good choice. Not sure if you're arguing just to argue, or if you're actually reading what I wrote.

My point was how is GGG supposed to take any of these complaints and solutions seriously if they just boil down to 'I want points easier'.

"

traax87 wrote:

Lab haters are the vocal minority. Pls, do not give them to much attention. They are not able to do the most simple tasks to get the powerfull ac points.

"

Albinosaurus wrote:

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

Funkdubious wrote:

How many of these threads were created by the same 10 or so players that seem to feel compelled to post a new thread with the same complaint every day?

I'm not super into the lab myself, but running it for ascendancy points has never caused me any issues. I would prefer that the end drops in uber lab were more rewarding, though.

When compiling the list I really didn't notice lots of common authors. I wasn't tempted at the time to record the authors along with the title and link. If someone wanted to do the work to add that information to the list then I would be willing to do that. What I don't want to happen though is for people to start creating new threads to just get on the list.

Ignore stuff like that. It's not even true, and its goal is the same as ad hominem attacks. It's a useless comment.

"

Shovelcut wrote:

No, it's somewhat true. I'm halfway thru the list and found 45+ threads by the same 20 or so posters, at least 2 threads are repeated in the list and one that no longer exists. A few have no reason to even be on this list.

A majority of the links are just simple "Lab killed me I quit" or "lab sucks get rid of it" posts or they were complaints that were already addressed (CI or hybrid ES).

I lack the will to go through it any further, can't take anymore mindless drivel for the day. There are some quality posts in there for sure though. It's hard to find them through all the BS.

"

XerxezBreak wrote:

The problem people find with Labyrinth is it requires a thought process which most Path of Exile players have lost or never had to begin with.

Incorporating a puzzle into the game gives players time to think about their next move rather than become mindless zombies.

This is why Labyrinth is one of the greatest features to the game, it gives players an opportunity to use their brain!

"

Turtledove wrote:

I guess you are asserting that 20 authors created 45 threads? So, someone else was asserting that it was 10 threads per author. Your estimate is much closer to the truth, I'm certain.

"

Turtledove wrote:

If there's a duplicate thread listed then please let me know so that I can delete one in the list. I'm open to publicly discussing any thread about whether or not it should be on the list.

"

Turtledove wrote:

Please back up something that you assert, I would really appreciate it.

"

Turtledove wrote:

I'd be surprised if there was a dead link in the list, since I reviewed the OP in every thread. If there is one then let me know so I can fix it.

"

Shovelcut wrote:

"

Turtledove wrote:

I guess you are asserting that 20 authors created 45 threads? So, someone else was asserting that it was 10 threads per author. Your estimate is much closer to the truth, I'm certain.

It's not an estimate, it's the hard numbers from going through the first 130 or so links.

"

Turtledove wrote:

I'd be surprised if there was a dead link in the list, since I reviewed the OP in every thread. If there is one then let me know so I can fix it.