"
sofocle10000 wrote:
Well I would consider giving GGG a bit more time, until 3.0 hits at least
That's my point of view exactly.
I know this thread has way too many pages to even consider reading back, but from time to time reading the same bullshit from the "everything is ok, GGG is the best company ever, they are the gods of game design and balance" crew, still triggers me.
But once again, the dudes posting before you had reached the "you are using a fake account" line of argument, which makes me explain once again that this is not a fake account, but the one I use to post in the forums... and I'm just too tired for today to keep this shit going...
If they prefer to pretend everything is alright, or don't know better to acknowledge that there's was a time when this game was actually harder and had a slower pace and you needed really good tree interactions, then they'll have the 3.0 they deserve and I'll move on from this game.
|
|
"
Emphasy wrote:
Well they did increase the damage of some mob skills (very noticable are the goatman fireballs), however the biggest change is the new map bosses. Trash mobs were always laughable and they would have to reduce power a lot to change that. I think going with more meaningful boss fights is a better choice anyway, however they do have to shift damage vs. sturdyness and rewards on some of them. But honestly if you compare Factory or Arcade to the old bosses they are far more intimidating. Of course some only slightly modified enemies are still pushovers, but exspecially some of the new additions are actually dangerous.
Making mobs actually do the appropriate damage they were suppose to idk if I would really say that was adjustment to AC, but rather fixing a problem that was clearly wrong with the game regardless.
The boss fight reworks is nice, but that rework could have went before AC classes and had similar effects....
If I get bored of D3 (which I know I will, new season starts today) I will come back and showcase how "patheticially" easy this game is both with showcasing an unascended "geared" character and an ascendend "non geared" character.
The challenge will be using some gear that people have been able to get for a while, stuff like regular atziri drops or whatever is fine, ideally only stuff that dropped before AC was added.
The other challenge will be playing an ascended character, utilizing random rares and maybe something like tabula or "shitty 6 link base.
Ideally both challenges would showcase how much power people have and when you consider each of these "halves" are put together for everyone, the game is trivial and the drop rates and power level is absurd. People excuse this as ok because there is like 5-6 "hard" bosses in the game......
https://youtu.be/T9kygXtkh10?t=285
FeelsBadMan
Remove MF from POE, make juiced map the new MF.
|
Posted bygoetzjam#3084on Jan 6, 2017, 11:08:16 AM
|
Of course there's a potential trap survival advantage by overleveling. Anyone saying otherwise is clueless.
Proportionately more life regen can be taken in the form of tree nodes (it's about percentage here - more %regen and less %health nodes), vitality aura can be leveled, end charges. It goes on and on.
Boring.
Yawn.
|
Posted byDeletedon Jan 6, 2017, 11:12:09 AM
|
"
The_Reporter wrote:
Of course there's a potential trap survival advantage by overleveling. Anyone saying otherwise is clueless.
Proportionately more life regen can be taken in the form of tree nodes (it's about percentage here - more %regen and less %health nodes), vitality aura can be leveled, end charges. It goes on and on.
Boring.
Yawn.
Way to miss the point.
The only significant advantage that overleveling gives in the lab is Izaro, the rest matters so little it's pointless.
"
goetzjam wrote:
So Chris sayeth and we just accepteth?
I mean my point was that they added the power, way before they "tried" to increase the challenge and I dont feel like AC is necessary to do the majority of the game....
Well if the game is supposedly balanced around the ascendancy, the "it is optional" argument looses a lot of strength yes.
Now, considering the power creep that has been happening, apart from maybe 1 or 2% of the content, the game without the point is like 10 times easier than at it's launch, that's another discussion tho imho.
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
|
Posted byFruz#6137on Jan 6, 2017, 11:23:33 AM
|
"
qwqwqw333_final wrote:
"
sofocle10000 wrote:
Well I would consider giving GGG a bit more time, until 3.0 hits at least
That's my point of view exactly.
...
But once again, the dudes posting before you had reached the "you are using a fake account" line of argument, which makes me explain once again that this is not a fake account, but the one I use to post in the forums... and I'm just too tired for today to keep this shit going...
...
This is the silly Internet Troll tactic of attacking the person to belittle their argument rather than addressing the argument.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
|
Posted byTurtledove#4014on Jan 6, 2017, 11:25:26 AM
|
"
qwqwqw333_final wrote:
When you can do Lab and get the points at lvl 33 or 70, then the game balance is fucked, since you can get to the end game with or without the power those points give.
Lab is optional in this sense, but nobody would consider their build finished without the ASC points, even if they over level and come back when the content is trivial, because the real end game content, is tuned to the most hardcore audience.
Which is fine.
The problem is you fucked 80% of the game content balance, because you know you can't make Lab less optional than this, because then a lot more players that do the Lab at the last possible moment just to get the points, would start joining the haters.
So the result is the game balance is fucked and on the easier side.
If ASC points were properly added into the characters progression, then you could really tune the game difficulty up.
The problem is GGG can't sustain their "we love the lab" stand with the "but you don't really need to do it until you are more than over ready because we know you hate that shit", on a real game balance state that's not a joke.
So If you wanna take the "stop making the game so casual" stand, then commit to it and demand mandatory Lab as a requirement to progress to the next difficulty level. So you can actually know what power level you need to tune your game to.
And then let's see how many players are actually ok with having to do the Lab in order to get the ASC points without cheese. Or really want more real difficulty added to the game.
I really liked this post and i had made a similar suggestion some months ago.
What if Lab was an whole act for example, a labyrinth related act. that upon completing it you would be granted the points. making it mandatory to progesses in the next difficulty would from the get go send the true message to everyone, be honest with your community you.. you like it : good , you dont : get the fuck out of here. and most people would have treat it that way too. But GGG masterfully disguised it as "optional" for the masses who eat grass to be happy. Besides the dishonesty and confusion there is a certain kind of broken design and ideas in all this.
Truthfully i would be so glad with a simple manifesto on the labyrinth, how the fuck was it concieved, designed, why that way, what made them force "optional alienating content", why why why.
Inundated with cockroaches, I am
https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/1609216 - labyrinth rework ideas/suggestions
|
Posted byRegulator#4587on Jan 6, 2017, 7:44:19 PMAlpha Member
|
They have talked about the design of the lab on many of podcast before....
https://youtu.be/T9kygXtkh10?t=285
FeelsBadMan
Remove MF from POE, make juiced map the new MF.
|
Posted bygoetzjam#3084on Jan 6, 2017, 7:59:00 PM
|
"
Regulator wrote:
"
qwqwqw333_final wrote:
When you can do Lab and get the points at lvl 33 or 70, then the game balance is fucked, since you can get to the end game with or without the power those points give.
Lab is optional in this sense, but nobody would consider their build finished without the ASC points, even if they over level and come back when the content is trivial, because the real end game content, is tuned to the most hardcore audience.
Which is fine.
The problem is you fucked 80% of the game content balance, because you know you can't make Lab less optional than this, because then a lot more players that do the Lab at the last possible moment just to get the points, would start joining the haters.
So the result is the game balance is fucked and on the easier side.
If ASC points were properly added into the characters progression, then you could really tune the game difficulty up.
The problem is GGG can't sustain their "we love the lab" stand with the "but you don't really need to do it until you are more than over ready because we know you hate that shit", on a real game balance state that's not a joke.
So If you wanna take the "stop making the game so casual" stand, then commit to it and demand mandatory Lab as a requirement to progress to the next difficulty level. So you can actually know what power level you need to tune your game to.
And then let's see how many players are actually ok with having to do the Lab in order to get the ASC points without cheese. Or really want more real difficulty added to the game.
I really liked this post and i had made a similar suggestion some months ago.
What if Lab was an whole act for example, a labyrinth related act. that upon completing it you would be granted the points. making it mandatory to progesses in the next difficulty would from the get go send the true message to everyone, be honest with your community you.. you like it : good , you dont : get the fuck out of here. and most people would have treat it that way too. But GGG masterfully disguised it as "optional" for the masses who eat grass to be happy. Besides the dishonesty and confusion there is a certain kind of broken design and ideas in all this.
Truthfully i would be so glad with a simple manifesto on the labyrinth, how the fuck was it concieved, designed, why that way, what made them force "optional alienating content", why why why.
I like the proposition here.
Do it, GGG or NO BALLS.
|
Posted byDeletedon Jan 6, 2017, 8:14:02 PM
|
"
The_Reporter wrote:
"
Regulator wrote:
"
qwqwqw333_final wrote:
When you can do Lab and get the points at lvl 33 or 70, then the game balance is fucked, since you can get to the end game with or without the power those points give.
Lab is optional in this sense, but nobody would consider their build finished without the ASC points, even if they over level and come back when the content is trivial, because the real end game content, is tuned to the most hardcore audience.
Which is fine.
The problem is you fucked 80% of the game content balance, because you know you can't make Lab less optional than this, because then a lot more players that do the Lab at the last possible moment just to get the points, would start joining the haters.
So the result is the game balance is fucked and on the easier side.
If ASC points were properly added into the characters progression, then you could really tune the game difficulty up.
The problem is GGG can't sustain their "we love the lab" stand with the "but you don't really need to do it until you are more than over ready because we know you hate that shit", on a real game balance state that's not a joke.
So If you wanna take the "stop making the game so casual" stand, then commit to it and demand mandatory Lab as a requirement to progress to the next difficulty level. So you can actually know what power level you need to tune your game to.
And then let's see how many players are actually ok with having to do the Lab in order to get the ASC points without cheese. Or really want more real difficulty added to the game.
I really liked this post and i had made a similar suggestion some months ago.
What if Lab was an whole act for example, a labyrinth related act. that upon completing it you would be granted the points. making it mandatory to progesses in the next difficulty would from the get go send the true message to everyone, be honest with your community you.. you like it : good , you dont : get the fuck out of here. and most people would have treat it that way too. But GGG masterfully disguised it as "optional" for the masses who eat grass to be happy. Besides the dishonesty and confusion there is a certain kind of broken design and ideas in all this.
Truthfully i would be so glad with a simple manifesto on the labyrinth, how the fuck was it concieved, designed, why that way, what made them force "optional alienating content", why why why.
I like the proposition here.
Do it, GGG or NO BALLS.
I believe that GGG knows that enough people are unhappy with Labyrinth that they need to do something about it. Meaning something along the lines of the OP of this thread. There are two kinds of ways that this could be fixed. What I will term here as an easy fix or a difficult fix. Easy and difficult is referring to the development effort. Labyrinth was the 2.2 release. The earliest release where an easy fix could be done was 2.4. The first likely release that a difficult fix could be done is 3.0. Added to this thought is the knowledge that GGG has to do something about the Ascendancy Point distribution if they eliminate a difficulty level leads me to conclude that we are likely to finally see this fix in 3.0.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
|
Posted byTurtledove#4014on Jan 6, 2017, 8:50:43 PM
|
We're likely to see something. I'm not as optimistic as you.
|
Posted byDeletedon Jan 6, 2017, 8:58:54 PM
|