Donald Trump

"

Head_Less wrote:

What do you try to prove by insulting every post trump supporters with ugly words and pretending to have higher morality than them?

You act like those bully you condemn, you don t have higher moral ground than Trump supporters it s actually quite the opposite since you can t accept the democratic vote.

But liberals can insults, restrict the freedom of speech and ban opposite point of view. For a liberal diversity is about thinking same as them. Those "dum" people who can t think like them are bigot and analphabets...

Well I think the bigot here is you and your tiny mind. Grow up a little and accept other people Pov.

1) I'm not trying to prove anything. Trumpers have already proven how repulsively fucking abhorrent they are by voting for Trump. I've personally communicated with many of these pieces of shit, and I'm comfortable calling them what they are. To be clear, when I talk about Trumpers, I'm not talking about the profoundly ignorant morons who were so damn oblivious that the only thing they knew about Trump was that he had an "R" next to his name. They're idiots, but my issues are with the human garbage that supported Trump knowing full well who and what he was. Those pieces of shit are Trumpers.

2) "Pretending" I have higher morality than people who voted for Trump? Listen, I'm not going over all of the sickening fucking things he has said and done over the course of his campaign or since he won the election. These are known facts. I'm standing on much more solid ground when it comes to basic human decency than anyone who would vote for fucking Trump.

3) Why do you think I can't accept the results of the election? Where have I ever claimed I don't? Trump is a repulsive, evil piece of shit, but he won. That's an obvious fucking fact, and you claiming that I don't accept it for some reason is just asinine. Making shit up is not an argument, though it's not like I expect better.

4) Calling evil pieces of shit out for being evil pieces of shit is not the same as being an evil piece of shit. I understand that most Trumpers embrace racism, xenophobia, and bigotry of all stripes, but me being against those things does not make me just as bad as the people who are for them, and it's fucking asinine to keep hearing Trumpers say "you're just as bad as racists when you say mean things about them."

5) Some of that nonsense you spouted is just the standard insane projection I expect from Trumpers. Liberals ban free speech and opposing points of view? Get the fuck outta here! Have you been following the protests in NC lately, where the GOP is having liberal protesters arrested? Yeah, liberals fucking hate that free speech.

You can find examples of someone from almost any group doing something bad, but liberal ideology is clearly very much in favor of free speech. If I recall correctly, though (and I fucking do), daddy Trump has been pretty hardline against free speech, and he's about to be the fucking president. Methinks though dost project too much.

And that shit about liberals not accepting actual diversity? Jesus that's so out of touch with reality. Maybe you're like most Trumpers, though, and the diversity you're looking for is "not racist" being valued and embraced equally with "super fucking racist." How do you feel about Donnie's position on diversity? I think he's knocking it out of the park. Old? Check! White? Check! Male? Check! Man, all fucking three of those good ol' Republican boxes checked, Donnie! Good job!

You guys live in an alternate reality, and it's a goddamn shitty one.

I could go through your entire rant to refute absolutely everything, may be even wipe up the drool a bit, but it's just a waste of time. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.

"

Jennik wrote:

5) Some of that nonsense you spouted is just the standard insane projection I expect from Trumpers. Liberals ban free speech and opposing points of view? Get the fuck outta here! Have you been following the protests in NC lately, where the GOP is having liberal protesters arrested? Yeah, liberals fucking hate that free speech.

Liberals banning free speech. It has happened before and will happen again. But don't take my word for it. Open your eyes and read media outside of your liberal bubble. You might learn a thing or two.

Now this first link, you might actually have to read a book. Don't be scared, just take the plunge if you truly support free speech:
https://www.amazon.com/Bullies-Culture-Intimidation-Silences-Americans/dp/1476710007/


http://www.edmundburkeinstitute.org/documents/The_Just_Cause_Liberal_Totalitarianism.pdf
https://peterbrownhoffmeister.wordpress.com/2013/03/04/on-school-shooters-the-huffington-post-doesnt-want-you-to-read-this/
http://davidfiorazo.com/2016/05/liberals-censor-speech-but-claim-diversity/
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/20/40-of-millennials-ok-with-limiting-speech-offensive-to-minorities/
http://reason.com/archives/2014/10/27/censorship-its-not-just-for-conservative
http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/how-campus-censorship-is-conquering-the-world-free-speech/18586

And remember, liberal "free speech" is more valuable and important than conservative "free speech". Liberals love to demonstrate that...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R6dzZdceT4

I could go on and on linking, but perhaps this gives you a better picture.

The key to properly understanding rights is differentiating between government and citizen. How it should be is:
* the government has no power to discriminate against people based upon gender, sexual orientation, skin color, etc.
* a private citizen, within the confines of their own private property and civil actions, should have the right to discriminate against anyone for any reason, no matter how stupid
* another private citizen, within their confines of their private property and civil actions, then has every right to discriminate against the original discriminator (it's A-OK to hate on bigots)
* the above assumes a free market; if crony capitalism makes it impossible for a new establishment to fairly compete against a pre-existing establishment, then discriminatory practices contrary to the people's will may be perpetuated

Under the same logic, it's horrifically wrong for there to be an official government guidance of allowable speech on the Internet. If Twitter or Facebook want to moderate what speech is allowed on their site, I recognize their right to do so, but I'm allowed to call the fucks for doing it, and seek alternate social media outlets. And if crony capitalism makes it so those alternative outlets cannot fairly compete with the established ones, then there's a problem.

"

Jennik wrote:

And that shit about liberals not accepting actual diversity? Jesus that's so out of touch with reality. Maybe you're like most Trumpers, though, and the diversity you're looking for is "not racist" being valued and embraced equally with "super fucking racist." How do you feel about Donnie's position on diversity? I think he's knocking it out of the park. Old? Check!

Old? Should he be looking at teenagers for these positions? Trump didn't pick based on age, he picked based on experience and qualifications. You can dispute whether his choices have relevant experience and/or qualfied, but discriminating against someone based on age (over 40) is not only wrong, but illegal.

https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/age.cfm

"

Jennik wrote:

"White? Check!

So Trump should pick people based off their race or color of their skin? That would be racist. I hope you aren't advocating illegal discrimination based on race.

"

Jennik wrote:

"Male? Check! Man, all fucking three of those good ol' Republican boxes checked, Donnie! Good job!

Because biology is destiny?

https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/sex.cfm

"

Jennik wrote:

You guys live in an alternate reality, and it's a goddamn shitty one.

Please stop advocating illegal activities

"The law forbids discrimination when it comes to any aspect of employment, including hiring, firing, pay, job assignments, promotions, layoff, training, fringe benefits, and any other term or condition of employment."

You had to dive pretty fucking deep to dredge up that horse shit, Nemo. You're also incredibly confused about what free speech actually is (which is to be expected, because a Trumper who is not confused and delusional is no Trumper at all).

When Facebook says "you can't say 'X' here," that's not being against free speech. Get back to me when Facebook stops shitty people like Trumpers from saying their insane, delusional, and harmful bullshit anywhere, by having laws passed to make it illegal. If I say you can't use bad words in front of my child, that's not me being against free speech.

The difference here should be obvious to any rational person. Why, then, does the right have so much difficulty understanding the difference between free speech, which deals with the government, and a private entity doing what they want on their own property? Oh, right, never mind. Rational.

Free speech hasn't gone anywhere, nemo. Evil libruls haven't taken it away from you. You can still freely share your personal views on Stormfront. Nobody has taken that away from you. The local convenience store kicking you out because of their "No Shoes, No Service" policy is not the libruls having it in for you. The cashier saying "Happy Holidays" isn't an attack on your religion.

Again, you live in an alternate reality where up is down and love is hate. There's no fixing you, but I'm certainly not going to buy your right wing bullshit or be sucked into your "librul conspiracy" insanity. You're suffering from the typical right wing persecution complex. Don't fucking blame liberals for that.

"

Head_Less wrote:

What do you try to prove by insulting every post trump supporters with ugly words and pretending to have higher morality than them?

because that's his m/o, if you've seen his other posts. broad generalizations that make little sense.
the funniest thing is always when the mask comes off and hypocrisy shows tho.

I've been spreading Trump memes nonstop since after the election, U MAD!? Jennik?

Maybe if the left wasn't acting like a bunch of spoiled, butthurt little children, then Trump supporters wouldn't be egging them on and rubbing the victory in their faces.

Just an interesting tidbit, but Jennik claimed to be an ethical vegan. Ironically, Hitler was a vegan for the same reasons. That means YOU MUST BE HITLER, dom dom dom dom.

Posts on my ignore list only show up in a brief flash when I load a page and when I'm replying, so I just noticed that someone posted that "LGBTs for TRUMP" flag, where the words were hastily scrawled in marker on the flag upside down. Seriously, if you're capable of falling for pandering that blatant and sad, you should get your head checked. That's on par with "you're living in hell, you walk down the street and get shot, vote for me, blacks!"

The ridiculousness of believing Trump cares about LGBTQ people is especially clear when you look at what Trump actually does instead of what fucking flag he holds upside down. Have you seen how incredibly anti-LGBTQ the people he's appointing are? For fuck's sake, these are the kinds of people I'd expect to show up to protest gay pride parades. Only now, instead of protesting, Trump has given them the power to affect some pretty fucking horrific change.

On the plus side, he hasn't appointed whatever anti-LGBTQ monsters to the supreme court that he's almost certainly going to yet. His litmus test is that whoever he appoints needs to want to repeal Rowe vs. Wade. The overlap between anti-women's rights justices and anti-LGBTQ justices is damn near 100%, and no fucking pandering with upside down flags scrawled on by people clearly unfamiliar with them is changing that.

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

* a private citizen, within the confines of their own private property and civil actions, should have the right to discriminate against anyone for any reason, no matter how stupid

Proof that you live in a fantasy land, in an atmosphere composed primarily of Randian fart gas. It's almost like we tried that before... I feel like something happened in the 60's that was really important... Fuck, what was it??

You deserve the candidate you voted for.

"

Jennik wrote:

On the plus side, he hasn't appointed whatever anti-LGBTQ monsters to the supreme court that he's almost certainly going to yet. His litmus test is that whoever he appoints needs to want to repeal Rowe vs. Wade. The overlap between anti-women's rights justices and anti-LGBTQ justices is damn near 100%, and no fucking pandering with upside down flags scrawled on by people clearly unfamiliar with them is changing that.

YEP!

But thank god we don't have to worry about emails! What a bullet we dodged!

Hows that Goldman Sachski swamp going there guys? Seeing how hard you got duped yet? Oh, of course not. Bless your little hearts.