GGG - Stop using double standards
|
And what case was that?
|
|
| |
|
edit. I think you are right. The initial text was "modifier" ?
I guess I forgot about that wording. Last edited by Mephisto_n#6597 on Dec 13, 2014, 2:57:41 AM
|
|
" No? Prior to 1.2 CoE said "Modifiers to Spell Damage also apply to Attacks", and affected More/Less Spell Damage. After 1.2, that mod's text was changed to "Increases and Reductions to Spell Damage also apply to Attacks", and More/Less Spell Damage is no longer converted into More/Less Attack Damage like it was before 1.2. |
|
"
Spoiler
protip:there never was any 1.0 ratio that got changed to 0.6
|
|
|
Salty tears from rich Acuity users. OP item should be nerfed no legacy.
|
|
|
No I don't own an Acuity. I don't care about the nerf.
That said, the gloves should have a legacy version. The only thing changed about the gloves is the leech's effectiveness. That is a numerical value of 100% effectiveness lowered to 60% effectiveness. No changes to the mechanics (from a player point of view). Critical hits leeches; only at 60% effectiveness. Simple. Clear. BUT because of the lowered number, they had to REWRITE a new line of code that forces the Devs to implement a second mechanic for the gloves. So for that reason, the changes must be retroactive. The confusing part: - Logically, a value decreased from 100% to 60% doesn't need to be retroactive based on simple understanding. - On actual development, the involvement of a new mechanic (more coding, more pain in the ass) require changes to the existing item. My question: Why can't the new line of code only affect the new Acuity drops? (Legacy) My guess: Because it would require two set of codes to represent the same gloves, one that has the new mechanic and the other that doesn't. (correct me) |
|
" 1. No need to worry how it's coded, they are the pros. They don't necessary want to create a legacy version and opted for retroactive change like crown of eyes. 2. pre 1.3 old acuity cost 180-220ex. Legacy means rise in pricing which is what every owner wants. It could be to control the price from spiraling wildly. |
|
|
With this Acuity nerf they destroyed all my efforts in the game since 1 year.
This is how they reward players for spending time in their game. GGG has no respect for his players. Was looking for supporter pack when i see this line " |
|
" when will ppl understand that there never was an effectiveness value before the nerf, so they couldnt just nerf the nonexisting value.
Spoiler
THUS NO LEGACY FFS
|
|
