"
drewiey wrote:
"
miljan wrote:
Really, go count how many people posted there, and compare it to other thread and see it for yourself how much wrong you are.
For the sake of the argument. 440 posts on that thread. I've seen atleast 5 from you. Considering, many took your example and proceeded to make yoloswag replies. I'd say only 128 voted. That's pretty much according to the official poster. I didn't even take into account human error when the votes were counted.I'd hate to be the guy that has to look through that mess.
Not to mention, the op could be biased and perhaps he inflated the votes(just a lil :)). Afterwards proceeded to make fancy graph, maybe confusing these forums with the Maple Story ones.
You see, even with only 129 people (not counting the ones that did not vote, just posted) saying in one thread makes that thread one of the more popular just in a few days. If you look through the forum you will find that the number of people posting there is one of the higher and more active threads out there, so yee, how ever you flip it its a lot of activity and makes you statement simply wrong.
I know it hurts man to see this results if you dont like them
Last edited by miljan#1261 on Dec 5, 2013, 7:19:47 PM
|
Posted bymiljan#1261on Dec 5, 2013, 7:18:04 PM
|
"
miljan wrote:
"
drewiey wrote:
"
miljan wrote:
Really, go count how many people posted there, and compare it to other thread and see it for yourself how much wrong you are.
For the sake of the argument. 440 posts on that thread. I've seen atleast 5 from you. Considering, many took your example and proceeded to make yoloswag replies. I'd say only 128 voted. That's pretty much according to the official poster. I didn't even take into account human error when the votes were counted.I'd hate to be the guy that has to look through that mess.
Not to mention, the op could be biased and perhaps he inflated the votes(just a lil :)). Afterwards proceeded to make fancy graph, maybe confusing these forums with the Maple Story ones.
You see, even with only 129 people (not counting the ones that did not vote, just posted) saying in one thread makes that thread one of the more popular just in a few days. If you look through the forum you will find that the number of people posting there is one of the higher and more active threads out there, so yee, how ever you flip it its a lot of activity and makes you statement simply wrong.
I know it hurts man to see this results if you dont like them
OMG, MASTER FORGIVE ME.
|
Posted bydrewiey#1972on Dec 5, 2013, 7:23:42 PM
|
"
Morgoth2356 wrote:
Sorry, but these small numbers mean nothing. And there won't be a SFL anyway.
Stop giving me De Ja Vu.
Same shit people said about looting options.
Standard Forever
|
Posted byiamstryker#5952on Dec 5, 2013, 7:28:26 PM
|
|
These small numbers mean nothing. My even smaller numbers are all that matters.
|
|
"
drewiey wrote:
...
OMG, MASTER FORGIVE ME.
All is forgiven Marius. xD
Last edited by miljan#1261 on Dec 5, 2013, 7:31:04 PM
|
Posted bymiljan#1261on Dec 5, 2013, 7:30:35 PM
|
"
iamstryker wrote:
"
Morgoth2356 wrote:
Sorry, but these small numbers mean nothing. And there won't be a SFL anyway.
Stop giving me De Ja Vu.
Same shit people said about looting options.
Well, 'ninja' looting affected every single player in the game who played in a group, while most people don't even know what SFL is.
GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
|
Posted byXavderion#3432on Dec 5, 2013, 7:30:43 PM
|
"
Xavderion wrote:
"
iamstryker wrote:
"
Morgoth2356 wrote:
Sorry, but these small numbers mean nothing. And there won't be a SFL anyway.
Stop giving me De Ja Vu.
Same shit people said about looting options.
Well, 'ninja' looting affected every single player in the game who played in a group, while most people don't even know what SFL is.
Doesn't change my point at all. I can't tell you how many times someone told me that all of the looting options supporters meant nothing because we were too "few" and that looting options would NEVER happen. Those people felt dumb not too long after that.
Standard Forever
|
Posted byiamstryker#5952on Dec 5, 2013, 7:32:13 PM
|
|
Just play self found for crying out loud.
Stop with the thread about it evrey 2 days FFS.
If u are playing self found , and not trading with others then y in the world would u even need a sepreat ladder for that ? thares nothing stoping u from doing this now , In fact i myself often do. If others are trading in the same ladder as u playing self found it has no impact on u what so ever, who cares ?
Just a sec let me grab a beer...@#*@ Ok how did I die this time
Learn the rules, it's the only way to exploit them.
|
Posted bySirSid#5235on Dec 5, 2013, 7:32:46 PM
|
"
SirSid wrote:
Just play self found for crying out loud.
Stop with the thread about it evrey 2 days FFS.
If u are playing self found , and not trading with others then y in the world would u even need a sepreat ladder for that ? thares nothing stoping u from doing this now , In fact i myself often do. If others are trading in the same ladder as u playing self found it has no impact on u what so ever, who cares ?
They want increased drop rates. Which also makes the poll kinda silly, I mean if you ask an average player 'hey do u want more lewtz??', of course he will say yes.
GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
|
Posted byXavderion#3432on Dec 5, 2013, 7:35:01 PM
|
|
"Self found league" is just a side effect of a terrible trading interface.
It's a band-aid on the wrong problem.
And excluding the guild bank, I play "self-found" and I don't think my gaming experience suffers for it.
[Hardcore] Soldiers of the Wasteland - sotwguild.com
-------------------------
Skill Resets are the last refuge of the weak and incompetent.
|
Posted byMiszou#0290on Dec 5, 2013, 7:35:18 PM
|
