Stop allowing streamers to have input on Gauntlet.

"

mefistozxz wrote:

]

I am just going to try this one more time...

Posting in a thread titled: Stop allowing streamers to have input on gauntlet.
The prevailing "argument" you inserted into was that somehow the Gauntlet is NOT an event meant for the community.
The only contribution you made prior to the aforementioned "line" was that streamers get paid to do what they do.
You then make the statement "Bring the game back to the community"

The ONLY thing being discussed was the Gauntlet and the fact that it is a streamer-created, streamer-funded, streamer-run event. And you throw out that line.

The context you stepped into, and provided, was that the streamer event such as the Gauntlet is NOT a community event and you want something "different" to occur: ie) bring the game BACK to the community. The direct inference of this statement, taking everything else into account and even NOT taking your words literally, is that the Gauntlet is somehow outside of the community. And if the Gauntlet is outside, then presumably the streamers who created it are ALSO outside the community.

And then you repeatedly say not to take your words literally. What else could they possibly mean given the context of this entire thread, and your own previous posts and insertions? And at what point are you going to CLARIFY what you mean.

I am honestly not trying to be mean here anymore. You are telling me I don't understand what you said. So freaking tell me what you mean!!!

"

SilentSymphony wrote:

I just support the general notion of the thread, Not to literal levels however i would never actually want streamers cut out of the mix that would be suicide for the game, but GGG could do better in regards for the general population.

"

SilentSymphony wrote:

I don't really care if you're being mean or not that's up for you to decide, You're just wrong.

Sorry.

"

mefistozxz wrote:

And then your words are not meant to be taken literally, but you expect people to just understand you because if they don't since we LITERALLY can't take you at your word,

"

I just support the general notion of the thread, Not to literal levels however i would never actually want streamers cut out of the mix that would be suicide for the game, but GGG could do better in regards for the general population.

"

mefistozxz wrote:

"

SilentSymphony wrote:

I don't really care if you're being mean or not that's up for you to decide, You're just wrong.

Sorry.

Smh man...another classic "lets have a conversation" line right there.

The topic of this thread is the GAUNTLET. Streamers, and the gauntlet. Its the title of the thread, it is the main talking point of all the pages before you started chiming in. You agree with the "figurative" message (whatever the heck that is), but not the literal topic everyone is discussing. And then your words are not meant to be taken literally, but you expect people to just understand you because if they don't since we LITERALLY can't take you at your word, then we are idiots not worthy of your time.

Did you think you were posting in some other thread? With some other "point" being argued?

I am so done with this now. I'll remember that you were the one trying to be high and mighty, asking for meaningful conversations on the forum next time we come together.

Apparently, words don't mean words.

"

Mashgesture wrote:

"

mefistozxz wrote:

And then your words are not meant to be taken literally, but you expect people to just understand you because if they don't since we LITERALLY can't take you at your word,

I mean yea they are just.. quadrupling down on saying nothing? Honestly lost count, seems to be the only way they speak.

See again below saying nothing, this time its actually worse as there is no "because ___" or "this is why" its just a blank statement:

"

I just support the general notion of the thread, Not to literal levels however i would never actually want streamers cut out of the mix that would be suicide for the game, but GGG could do better in regards for the general population.

And then assuming the general population has no/little say or involvement in events comparative to the streamer (Ziz) who organized it (spoiler alert this is also false).

So a false, nothing statement of support of the OP. There is no point to be taken here.