The Multi-box Thread: How it ruins the game.

"
Spoonmann wrote:
"
Magnicon2 wrote:


By the way, individual players have been getting together to do what MBs have been doing since the beginning, and they do it significantly more efficiently then the MBs do. I wouldn't be surprised if they create more currency then the MBers.
Seriously people, its 2013. The ignorance is getting really old.


I feel that you are correct in what you are saying. A party of 6 humans working together should be able to farm more efficiently than a multi-boxer using even the best available software.

The majority of people dont group in a party of 6 and farm effectivley tho thats the problem, that would also negate the whole "butt-hurt" experience...sorry i mean "cut-throat" experience that GGG want.
"
SkyCore wrote:
"
ShadyC wrote:

The forager without the tractor CAN'T be happy just with having what he needs, because he can't get what he needs. The market inflated too high, and the normalized farming that he can achieve in a day doesn't properly feed himself and his family. They're hungry and cold, and the crop season is about to end. Their house is falling apart and the temperatures are dropping. Meanwhile, Mr. Tractor just upsized his property. He's got a two-story house, fully reinforced for hurricane protection, and he has all the food & money in the world. His family is getting fat because of how well-off they are.

As a farmer or a forager, I dont NEED a single damn thing the market offers. Not a single thing. I can provide for my family just fine.
That is just one thing of a thousand which you fail to see.


Then why do you think GGG made PoE with progression? By your stupid logic, everyone should be level 100 with all possible items in the game. NO randomization. No progression. No trading.

Stop making excuses for cheating.
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
"
Cambob wrote:
Is multiboxing included with the game? No.
Does multiboxing give one player an advantage over other players? Yes.

multiboxing is cheating.
That's analogous to saying that alcoholic beverages and marijuana are immoral.

If you drink alcohol or smoke marijuana, does that make you more likely to commit crimes like:
  • driving while intoxicated?
  • assault and battery?
  • sexual assault or rape?
I'm pretty sure that, strictly speaking, the answer is yes. If you plot it all out on a graph, there's probably a positive correlation.

But does that make the use of those substances immoral in and of itself? For alcohol, almost everyone thinks it isn't intrinsically immoral, and in marijuana's case it's a fiercely debated, controversial issue.

Multiboxing is the act of one individual simultaneously having multiple accounts logged in separately on different machines.

Is that a warning sign for botting and other forms of automation that exploit an in-game economy? Certainly. There's a positive correlation.

But is the act intrinsically wrong? If you keep it at its minimalist definition, is it cheating? No. If it's just one guy hopping from machine to machine, playing musical chairs with himself, then there's really no harm in it.

Like I said, the real enemy is botting, and although it might make some sense for GGG to keep a watchful eye on people they see multiboxing, it is not cheating in-and-of-itself.

In my opinion, multiboxing should not be punished at all; on the other hand, I'm not a Bible-thumper.


Seriously? calm down. That last line made me laugh.
The fact you can't understand what cheating is and what it does is unfortunate.

Multiboxing/multi-farming gives one player a distinct advantage over another player.
multiboxing is NOT included with the game.
multiboxing, no matter how complex and difficult it is, is still cheating.

It's amazing that this is too complicated for you to understand.
cheating is cheating.
"
Cambob wrote:


Then why do you think GGG made PoE with progression?

Because of our nature to be happy when we achieved a goal. GGG is in the business of setting up triggers for the release of dopamine and other chemicals in the brain. They give us an enjoyable world, we give them money.
Well at least some of us give them money. I am included in the list of donators, and as far as i can tell you are not. Now what does that say? Cheap stake.

"
Cambob wrote:

By your stupid logic, everyone should be level 100 with all possible items in the game. NO randomization. No progression. No trading.

Please walk me through the logic, cause i for the life of me cannot distort what iv said to anything remotely resembling that logic train.
Far as i can tell you seem to think getting to level 100 with the best possible items is 'needed'. That might explain a few things.

"
Cambob wrote:

Stop making excuses for cheating.

No where have i ever said multi-boxing should be acceptable. What i am arguing against is that it 'ruins the game'. There is very clear difference.
For years i searched for deep truths. A thousand revelations. At the very edge...the ability to think itself dissolves away.Thinking in human language is the problem. Any separation from 'the whole truth' is incomplete.My incomplete concepts may add to your 'whole truth', accept it or think about it
Last edited by SkyCore#2413 on Apr 2, 2013, 7:58:16 PM
"
Cambob wrote:
Multiboxing/multi-farming gives one player a distinct advantage over another player.
No, one guy switching seats from one computer to another has no advantage. You need to use botting and other forms of automation to gain an advantage.
"
Cambob wrote:
multiboxing is NOT included with the game.
You're allowed to create as many separate accounts as you want. That's pretty close to being included in the game. Botting, however, is a subversion of the game.
"
Cambob wrote:
multiboxing, no matter how complex and difficult it is, is still cheating.
It's not complex, it's not difficult, and that's almost as silly as saying me creating a new forum account named CambobSucks to troll you is cheating. Me creating a bot that automatically created new accounts to create spam advertisement threads in General Discussion would be a different story.
"
Cambob wrote:
cheating is cheating.
Tautologies: the mark of a true intellectual.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
Last edited by ScrotieMcB#2697 on Apr 2, 2013, 7:53:12 PM
wtf are you talking here about rofl?


It all comes down to only this tiny sentence...

WAS THE GAME DESIGNED TO PLAY WITH ONE CLIENT OR WITH MULTIPLE CLIENTS PER INTERNET CONNECTION?

Now all sit down, grab a coffee, and think again before you write senseless posts on drugs or whatever to justify missbehaviour. lmao

You can do tons of stuff in life which is not forbidden. Is it approved? No. So stop that fking argument of nonsense. I am pretty sure if there was an easy way to prevent this crapmethod of lowskilled losers without ruining the game than GGG would do it..
http://tinyurl.com/ooety9v - Ranger bow lightning arrow crit build
Last edited by Dan1986#1261 on Apr 2, 2013, 8:00:24 PM
"
SkyCore wrote:
"
Cambob wrote:


Then why do you think GGG made PoE with progression?

Because of our nature to be happy when we achieved a goal. GGG is in the business of setting up triggers for the release of dopamine and other chemicals in the brain. They give us an enjoyable world, we give them money.
Well at least some of us give them money. I am included in the list of donators, and as far as i can tell you are not. Now what does that say? Cheap stake.

"
Cambob wrote:

By your stupid logic, everyone should be level 100 with all possible items in the game. NO randomization. No progression. No trading.

Please walk me through the logic, cause i for the life of me cannot distort what iv said to anything remotely resembling that logic train.
Far as i can tell you seem to think getting to level 100 with the best possible items is 'needed'. That might explain a few things.

"
Cambob wrote:

Stop making excuses for cheating.

I do not make excuses for cheating. No where have i ever said multi-boxing should be acceptable. What i am arguing against is that it 'ruins the game'. There is very clear difference.


1. Cheapskate, not cheap stake.
2. I have a mini pet frog and thank you for donating.. 'bronze' pfft.
3. You said you do not need a damn thing the market offers. then why play a multiplayer game?
4. You claim to be self sufficient, so why bother to play if u have it all?
5. I like lasagna, but that doesn't make me Italian
6. Multiboxing doesn't ruin the game? Is that really how you see it?

Oh.. of course that is how you see it. Because you're self sufficient. you don't need anything on the market. I guess all the multiboxing pays off for you then? Right?

Your snide comment about cheap 'stake' is a bit petty, don't ya think?
Nothing more than a silly troll attack /wrists.
Last edited by Cambob#4516 on Apr 2, 2013, 7:59:42 PM
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
"
Cambob wrote:
Multiboxing/multi-farming gives one player a distinct advantage over another player.
No, one guy switching seats from one computer to another has no advantage. You need to use botting and other forms of automation to gain an advantage.
"
Cambob wrote:
multiboxing is NOT included with the game.
You're allowed to create as many separate accounts as you want. That's pretty close to being included in the game. Botting, however, is a subversion of the game.
"
Cambob wrote:
multiboxing, no matter how complex and difficult it is, is still cheating.
It's not complex, it's not difficult, and that's almost as silly as saying me creating a new forum account named CambobSucks to troll you is cheating. Me creating a bot that automatically created new accounts to create spam advertisement threads in General Discussion would be a different story.
"
Cambob wrote:
cheating is cheating.
Tautologies: the mark of a true intellectual.


excuses, excuses.
dead actor... dead actor.

nothing you wrote alters the fact that cheating is cheating no matter how hard you cry that it's not.
"
Kissell13 wrote:
"
ToxicRatt wrote:
"
Dudebag wrote:
i dont think GGG said anything about multiboxing=cheating.

did they?


if people have good computer to run multiple accounts, that's not cheating.

if people have multiple computers to run accounts , that's not cheating.


if people use 3rd party program, that's cheating.

bot, cheating.


dont mix those together tho.




Explain to me how you multibox WITHOUT a 3rd party program?



All Hardware and Multiple pc's. If you wanna call shennanigans on 3 party progams, then start by removing all mouse and kb software then your OS. They are all 3rd party programs. Not exactly sure how to reinstall the game on a pc with no operating system but maybe youll have better luck than most :)



Anyone wishing to understand multiboxxing before coming and posting more utter nonsense go to www.dual-boxing.com and read.


Kissel...same tired arguments. Keyboard/Mice are necessary to play the game however; one cannot multibox without 3rd party software unless one is alt/tabbing to mutliple windows. If you can play 6 characters at once without any other 3rd party program you are a better man than I.

Multiboxing ruins games. It leads to RTM. GGG is against RTM therefore they should be against multiboxing.

Crafting doesn't exist in POE. Gambling does...and the house always wins.

Velocireptile - I LOL'ed. Which made me fart. I wish the office were empty right now :(

Hardlicker - I had to push the dog out of the way so I could get to the sexy quilt.
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
"
Cambob wrote:
Is multiboxing included with the game? No.
Does multiboxing give one player an advantage over other players? Yes.

multiboxing is cheating.
That's analogous to saying that alcoholic beverages and marijuana are immoral.

If you drink alcohol or smoke marijuana, does that make you more likely to commit crimes like:
  • driving while intoxicated?
  • assault and battery?
  • sexual assault or rape?
I'm pretty sure that, strictly speaking, the answer is yes. If you plot it all out on a graph, there's probably a positive correlation.

But does that make the use of those substances immoral in and of itself? For alcohol, almost everyone thinks it isn't intrinsically immoral, and in marijuana's case it's a fiercely debated, controversial issue (at least in the US).



lets not put alcohol and marijuana in a comparison. there is no comparison. One helps people, is natural and has never hurt anyone while remaining illegal. The other kills people every day and causes people to commit crimes they probably wouldn't have otherwise, yet is legal. It makes no sense. Corruption and greed.
Rampage IGN: RIP_Stannis_Baratheon

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info