Donald Trump and US politics

A better question is why to people vote democrat. Its basically party of thievery. Steal from haves and give to have nots lazy shiftless ppls.

Incidentally whats why it never works when you give losers power. They have to resort to killing ppl like siberia work camps to give incentive to productive ppls who ordinarily like money for efforts. Or lessor extent in Venezuela where they re just shooting ppls who dont go along with socialist regime.

i'd never vote for party of thieves. I dont like Trump but he's 100x better than any democrat. I dont believe in any taxes so hopefully they get that tax cut through which would never happen with hillary.

I'm brown, a Muslim, and think democratic party is all full of losers. It;s so easy to make money in this country. Just be of service. No excuses. I'm 22 and support 4 ppl easy. (wife 2 kids and myself)

Aim_Deep, the problem with Republicans is they always need more money to fund a war machine that actively seeks fights around the world where there might not otherwise be one. We're dumping trillions down the toilet. We got crumbling infrastructure at home, yet Republicans value war mongering overseas more than fixing roads, bridges, sewers, and other infrastructure. Both parties are big spenders. They just differ on where the money should go. So, your money either goes towards a bomb to drop on a village full of sheep herders, or to some lazy bum in America. Take your pick, it's a 2 party system, with no viable 3rd options.

Neocons. Basically they are liberals who latched onto govt teet and want to change world. And if they cant so what they profit from directors of think tanks, defense contractors and other government cheese. It's biggest scam ever and anyone who join military is a fool getting their ass shot off while neocons kids play grab ass in the Hamptons.

Again starve the beast.Thats probably #1 reason I'm against taxes. we slaughter ppl around the world to enrich 1%. Naw man should have war bonds like old days.

"

Xavderion wrote:

We're going deeper...

Spoiler

I'm increasingly convinced that intersectional feminism as a movement will literally embarrass itself to death before the end of 2019 (if not sooner) and disappear completely from leftist rhetoric — that is, cable news coverage — by early 2020. In the collective consciousness of those with no memory retention, it'll be as if it never happened.

That's probably a good thing for humanity in general, but perhaps a bad thing for Trump getting reelected. People like Dave Rubin will probably go back to being lefties. Maybe me too, if they come up with a decent (anti-neocon, inverse Hillary) platform. Although they never do what they promise anyway.

"

MrSmiley21 wrote:

Aim_Deep, the problem with Republicans is they always need more money to fund a war machine that actively seeks fights around the world where there might not otherwise be one.

Obummer proved rather conclusively that selling out to the MIC is a bipartisan effort. Classical neocon archvillain John McCain would fit in as a typical Democrat these days — pro-war, anti-Trump, pro-amnesty, pro-ObamaCare, russophobic.

"

MrSmiley21 wrote:

Aim_Deep, the problem with Republicans is they always need more money to fund a war machine that actively seeks fights around the world where there might not otherwise be one. We're dumping trillions down the toilet. We got crumbling infrastructure at home, yet Republicans value war mongering overseas more than fixing roads, bridges, sewers, and other infrastructure. Both parties are big spenders. They just differ on where the money should go. So, your money either goes towards a bomb to drop on a village full of sheep herders, or to some lazy bum in America. Take your pick, it's a 2 party system, with no viable 3rd options.

Here's the list of the senators who voted against the 700 billion military spending bill. Note how only 4 Democrats voted against it. It's a uniparty system, bought by the deep state.

4 Dems, 3 Reps and Bernie Sanders. So 5/8 Lefties. Slight anti-war advantage to them. Slight.

700b is not even touching our war machine. Does not include CIA/NSA/ vet affiars and a dozen other programs. We literally spend twice that. China or Russia could end us with 1/20th that. Its a massive welfare program at this point. Sure we should defend the country but we offend it

16 years toiling in afghanistan fighting guys in sandals with Korean era war weapons should tell you that. - which we are losing BTW. Taliban controls 65% of the country and will control ALL of it before we go runnin. Mark my words on that. US doesnt understand people who love to die for their country. USA gets derisive Code Pink. Mujaheddin get celebrations.

I guess we should just be lucky Russia is not giving the Mujaheddin Igla missiles like we gave them Stingers back in the day. Would be over a long time ago.

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

Obummer proved rather conclusively that selling out to the MIC is a bipartisan effort. Classical neocon archvillain John McCain would fit in as a typical Democrat these days — pro-war, anti-Trump, pro-amnesty, pro-ObamaCare, russophobic.

I don't think the two party system differs enough. Regardless, a good chunk of the budget is going toward stuff we don't need; being proposed by both sides. I think we could cut our budget by 1/3 and still function as a country.

Corporate lobbying should be illegal. Unfortunately, none of the politicians are going to vote to cut off their campaign funding. We don't have enough honest people in government to do what needs to be done. This country is going down, regardless of who's president. The system is corrupted irreparably at this point. The only way they salvage anything that resembles a government, in the future, is by changing to a Quasi-Authoritarian state. We're already headed in that direction. I believe that all Democracies will eventually lead to authoritarian governments. Politics isn't static, so governments can't be either.

We'd operate fine on 10% of our budget... but lots of companies would go out of business.

*EDITED for reasons *