Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support DONE!!!!!

"
Turtledove wrote:
Spoiler
From thread Labyrinth review for 3.0
I'm responding here rather in that thread to avoid potentially derailing that thread with a tangential topic post.

"
MasterTBC wrote:
I was one of the people who liked the Labyrinth when it came out however, I'm beginning to understand why people hate the lab because I'm starting to hate it too and that is sad.


Here is my proposal:

Normal Lab: Delete

Cruel Lab: Reduce Area Level to 3.0's Expansion Act 3
Now you can get boot and glove enchantment in a relatively early state of the game which is good and can prepare you for act 4 and onwards.
One run of this Lab will give you 1 Ascendancy point up to a maximum of 2.

Merciless Lab: Can be found in Act 8
The Area level will probably be a little lower than current lab which will make it easier to get the points.
Since you have to reroll Enchantments anyway getting one Ascendancy point each run seems like a fair and better progression than getting 2 at once.
Merciless Lab will prepare you for Act 9 and Act 10.
One run of this Lab will give you 1 Ascendancy point up to a maximum of 6.

Uber Lab: No Ascendancy points and is optional content.
It is a hard engame dungeon with big rewards.

Why this change?
For most builds its important to get Ascendancy points as early as possible.
What is the point of getting Ascendancy nodes when your character is already finished or you are already 20-30 levels overleveled?

Players want to enjoy the Ascendancy classes so don't make them grief.


Problems with current Lab:

Uber Lab is annoying and unnecessary.
What is the point of getting two more Ascendancy points when you have to be level 90 and insane damage to even do Uber Izaro??
The trials are shit because the traps deal too much damage.
Also in the burning ground one you get physically blocked by the infinitly spawning skeletons.

Blade Sentries and Spinning Blades deal too much damage.

Make Traps deal the same damage to Life than to ES.
Life builds have no way of replenishing their HP after they are out of flasks while ES regenerates indefinitly.


Endless Sting bleed damage is too high while moving.
Sentinel Traps should be a hindrance and not a get rekt.
They are placed in safe zones inbetween Trap cluster.
Thats fucking bullshit!

Opened a chest in uber lab with silver key it dropped 3 rare items
Ineffective -> Waste of time.
Make the rewards worth your time.
Something like a guaranteed random unique item or a selection of various flasks.
If you don't have insane damage uber izaro is impossible without insta leech.

Uber Izaro needs cooldowns.
Its not fun if he uses 3 skills almost simoultaneously.
You are forced to evade them unable to attack yourself.
His basic attack is overkill and he kills you with it even when you are half a screen away.

There is no need to make the last phase of the fight harder since it is already harder when you go for the keys. Dying in the last phase makes people ragequit and give up trying.

I probably forgot some things.


MasterTBC, thank you for voicing your opinion and suggestion. I've added your name to the list now 748 voices long. As the list grows longer our voices grow stronger.

Here's MasterTBC's profile summary.

Guild:
Solo

Joined:
Jan 29, 2014

Last Visited:
Feb 23, 2017

Total Forum Posts:
108 (0.09 posts per day)

A spot check of posts seems to indicate a majority of posts in the Feedback and Suggestions forum and about 30 or 40 posts made prior to release of the labyrinth. The relevance of these two things is: the 40 posts being made prior to release of the labyrinth is good evidence that MasterTBC is not an alt account of mine which has been argued by a paranoid labyrinth supporter. The apparent majority of posts to Feedback and Suggestions seems to support my conclusion that GGG could perhaps take the total number of posters to the Feedback and Suggestions forum and divide that into the 748 for a rough guess at the floor for percentage of players that have a dislike of labyrinth.
Maybe you should send a message to each person on your list. Because some of them don't know they hate the lab:
"
ladish wrote:
"
Kavlor wrote:
"
Aim_Deep wrote:
No you're silent minority. You ppl aint fooling me. I think this is a troll thread anyway.


Ah well hard to believe when I received a pm because I was on a list of people unhappy with the lab.I like the lab so no idea how I ended up on this list.

I got one as well lol.
https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/1837985/page/4#p14219087
You're eager to add people to your list but people have to request removal. Maybe just make sure people want to be there before adding them?
Guild Leader The Amazon Basin <BASIN>
Play Nice and Show Some Class www.theamazonbasin.com
Last edited by mark1030#3643 on Mar 27, 2017, 4:12:08 PM
"
mark1030 wrote:
Maybe you should send a message to each person on your list. Because some of them don't know they hate the lab:

https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/1837985/page/4#p14219087
You're eager to add people to your list but people have to request removal. Maybe just make sure people want to be there before adding them?


The majority of new people added to the list get a response to their post. Others I send a PM to if I put the response in this thread. So your idea of sending out a message to all 750 people really doesn't make much sense. Kaludoz did not do this so some people could have been added to the list and not know it. But since you seem to have no problem with bothering people by suggesting this idea, feel free to send out a PM yourself. I don't believe anyone has ever asked me to remove them from the list. So it can't be the big problem that you make it out to be. It is not a list of people that hate the labyrinth anyway. As I state in the OP

"
Note that there are many problems with labyrinth and many people have argued on both sides of the argument. The purpose of this list is not meant to "tag" anyone into any particular camp. It is meant primarily to demonstrate that many people have things about labyrinth that they think can be improved upon. Unlike the false assertions by some that have argued against any need to fix this problem there are far more than the 5, 10, or 20 that they incorrectly asserted have posted in support of changes. This list blows those silly assertions out of the water.


A common example of this is the horrible design decision to not allow portals out of the labyrinth. This was a decision made by self absorbed irrational designers that thought that people don't have real life issues that frequently pop up. So if someone that otherwise likes labyrinth but thinks that portals should be allowed then I'll add them to the list. They always have the option to have their name removed.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
"
Turtledove wrote:
I don't believe anyone has ever asked me to remove them from the list.
How many of them know they are on the list? Hard to ask not to be when you didn't ask to be on it in the first place so have no idea your name shows up. Not talking about the latest people you've added. Talking about the ones that happened before you posted responses telling them you were adding them.
Guild Leader The Amazon Basin <BASIN>
Play Nice and Show Some Class www.theamazonbasin.com
"
mark1030 wrote:
"
Turtledove wrote:
I don't believe anyone has ever asked me to remove them from the list.
How many of them know they are on the list? Hard to ask not to be when you didn't ask to be on it in the first place so have no idea your name shows up. Not talking about the latest people you've added. Talking about the ones that happened before you posted responses telling them you were adding them.


As mentioned in the OP Zaludoz made the original list at 582. You are free to do the analysis by looking at my posting history. That would perhaps miss a few PM's where I didn't make a post but feel free to factor that in or not into your analysis.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
I have noticed that my name is on the list. If that list is solely people who object to the labyrinth I want my name off that list.

While I have made threads about how to improve the labyrinth. They are mainly to address people's issues with the labyrinth, to make it more enjoyable for everyone, so that it STAYS.

I like the labyrinth and want to find ways to make more people to like it, because I feel moving the game away from pure hack 'n slash to having to pay attention to your surroundings is a good thing.
i just hope you are paid - and well! - to do this..
"
sidtherat wrote:
i just hope you are paid - and well! - to do this..

I hope it's by Blizzard, the cheap-ass bastards wasting money on this would make my day :)
Wish the armchair developers would go back to developing armchairs.

◄[www.moddb.com/mods/balancedux]►
◄[www.moddb.com/mods/one-vision1]►
list is pretty hilarious

I like how people with supporter titles shown get the '$' to their name, indicating that somehow they have more weight or something

I like how people who didnt sign up for this EXPLICITLY were nonetheless added to this list to give it more weight

if you are willing to do #2 to what length will you go to basically push your point/agenda across ? who knows ?
What is wrong with having a good opinion of the labyrinth?

I have poor reflexes (due to health issues) and only play hardcore characters (yah I'm stupid). When I first encountered the trails much less they labyrinth I thought they they were hell. But I ran trails again and again and again. Then I ran the first labyrinth again and again and again.

Afterwards I noticed that I noticed enemies/bosses attacks better. I got better reacting to my surroundings. While it is still hell for me, it is fun from time to time and just don't want it gotten rid of.

I do agree is is probably a mistake to have the ascendancy points connected to the labyrinth, but if it is either ax the labyrinth or keep it how it is, I'd prefer to keep it how it is.
Last edited by CidAvadose#5657 on Mar 27, 2017, 5:23:59 PM
"
CidAvadose wrote:
I have noticed that my name is on the list. If that list is solely people who object to the labyrinth I want my name off that list.

While I have made threads about how to improve the labyrinth. They are mainly to address people's issues with the labyrinth, to make it more enjoyable for everyone, so that it STAYS.

I like the labyrinth and want to find ways to make more people to like it, because I feel moving the game away from pure hack 'n slash to having to pay attention to your surroundings is a good thing.


It's a list of people who want to see changes to the Labyrinth. The degree of change differs, and some people on my initial list like the labyrinth, but still saw things that could be improved. It's all been made clear several times in several posts.

No longer a direct reply:
I'd potentially like the Labyrinth if it wasn't mandatory for every character I ever make. A nice mini-game to diversify my play time when I can take the frustration... (unless other good changes are made to the actual labyrinth as have been suggested).

So yes, there are people who like the labyrinth on my initial list. They wanted to see change. "Everything" isn't OK as it is, as it stands, like some people seem to say GGG will never change the labyrinth or make changes suggested because "everything is fine" ... nonsense.

Plenty of people have wanted change, and still want change. There are good reasons for the changes, and many won't impact the original state of the labyrinth (being alternatives, leaving the current labyrinth in place).

Anyway, these posts keep popping up wondering "why is this big list here? Who are on it? Makes no difference, stop it. blah blah"...

Yes, the thread is beneficial and serves its purpose just fine. If you think it's not worth maintaining, don't maintain it... or ignore it... yeah, you don't have to read every thread on the forums or agree with their existence.
Last edited by Zaludoz#6325 on Mar 27, 2017, 6:07:56 PM

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info