Remove Only Stash Unlock!
" This is absolutely false. Whether explicitly stated, or implied through allowed behavior and lack of reinforcement otherwise, read only tabs have clearly been, for a year now, a solution for "buy one tab, have it in all leagues." " If there was a problem, it can (likely) be directly attributed to the decision to "buy one tab, have it in all leagues." However, those are the rules GGG established, and the rules under which players made the informed decision to purchase new tabs. Changing the rules post-hoc is foolhardy at best, unethical at worst. " If that is the problem, then there is a more elegant solution--one which accepts accountability for making a poor decision (if indeed that is the case), and does not negatively affect players for the informed decisions they made. Devolving Wilds
Land “T, Sacrifice Devolving Wilds: Search your library for a basic land card and reveal it. Then shuffle your library.” |
![]() |
Yay, now there is no point in me ever buying more tabs. I have probably 25 tabs of temp league junk. Until now didn't affect my choice whether or not to buy tabs. If it's just going to unlock the temp-league tabs, I'll need to drop a tonne of dough before I actually expand my stash.
Congrats GGG, you've seen my last greenback! |
![]() |
" I have paid for exactly as many stash tabs as I need. It's not my fault GGG designed the game as leagues that funnel gear into each other, causing "overflow" of gear. RO tabs are indeed temporary, with the time you have to vacate them not being specified ;) I'll repeat it again, slowly: I would not have any problems with this change, even if you are forced to convert RO tabs on purchase, as long as the user could choose which tab gets converted. Since you cant choose, it smells like a not very ethical trick. When night falls She cloaks the world In impenetrable darkness Last edited by morbo#1824 on Jul 7, 2014, 8:47:39 AM
|
![]() |
" PR spin. When a company does something, they always announces it as "beneficial", "convenient", "we did this for you".... which more often than not is complete BS in one way or another. The remove-only tabs were always intended to be temporary. GGG expected people to at some point use/access the items on these tabs and that eventually the tabs would be cleared and deleted. However, real world, this doesn't happen. So GGG implemented a fix. It's that simple. But GGG will never present it this way. Thus, the PR spin. |
![]() |
So, did anyone ask support if they can get around this shitty new system? :P
|
![]() |
" I was wondering the same thing, after my last post ^-^ Support is pretty freakin awesome, and I feel we're all assuming an awful lot here. At any rate (back to assuming ;D): @Galtrovan: I really don't think any of us are in a position to suggest what "GGG intended." We can, however, examine expectations, implied or otherwise, established over a year's worth of precedence. No matter which way you spin it, some players feel punished by this decision, and assuming either which way, I don't believe it's the players who are at fault. My position is simply: Perhaps something needed to change with the stash tab situation, but if so, it should be done in a manner that does not retroactively enforce rules contrary to the established expectations, under which players made decisions to purchase stash tabs. I don't think there's anything unreasonable about that; I do, however, think it's unreasonable to express disagreement based upon an assumption of intention. Devolving Wilds Land “T, Sacrifice Devolving Wilds: Search your library for a basic land card and reveal it. Then shuffle your library.” Last edited by CanHasPants#3515 on Jul 7, 2014, 9:37:26 AM
|
![]() |
It doesn't use RNG to decide which remove-only stash tab to convert to a normal stash tab, the game simply remembers which tab is which regardless of you repositioning/renaming them. It will convert the first tab in the original order of tabs, to a normal stash tab.
It only seems like RNG because everyone re-arranges their tabs differently from each other. Computer specifications: Windows 10 Pro x64 | AMD Ryzen 5800X3D | ASUS Crosshair VIII Hero (WiFi) Motherboard | 16GB 3600MHz RAM | MSI Geforce 1070Ti Gamer | Corsair AX 760watt PSU | Samsung 860 Pro 512GB SSD & WD Black FZEX HDD Last edited by Nicholas_Steel#0509 on Jul 7, 2014, 9:49:20 AM
|
![]() |
Result: Players with many RO stashtabs won't buy Stashtabs anymore.
|
![]() |
" Yes, I have expressed my same concerns about the change and have another thread going in the Feedback Forum on the same topic. Auto making a remove-only stash tab a regular tab needs to be stopped "You've got to grind, grind, grind at that grindstone..."
Necessity may be the mother of invention, but poor QoP in PoE is the father of frustration. The perfect solution to fix Trade Chat: www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2247070 |
![]() |
" I completely disagree. This change completely undermines the idea that PoE is a long term grindy arpg that we can expect to be playing for years and years. See my Feedback forum post here: Auto making a remove-only stash tab a regular tab needs to be stopped with my follow up post hopefully explaining why the change is very detrimental to long term playing of PoE. "You've got to grind, grind, grind at that grindstone..."
Necessity may be the mother of invention, but poor QoP in PoE is the father of frustration. The perfect solution to fix Trade Chat: www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2247070 |
![]() |