Self-Found (League) [Thread outdated!]
"Read more; morbo was specifically advocating increased drop rates. When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
|
![]() |
" No.. Because it's not JUST getting rid of the auction house, they are changing the entire drop rate to reflect the fact that players are expected to get their loot from mobs not from trading. The D3 devs said that it's not a case of the trading was better, it was a case of trading was required/essential to get any distance in the game, which they feel is completely the wrong approach for an ARGP which is about finding your gear by killing mobs I really cannot understand why any mention of playing self found immediate has you claiming it will make any argp mentioned worse. As for which side of the game is "shittier" to use your words, I guess it depends on whether you enjoy playing a hack n' slash to get loot, or you prefer playing an economic trading simulator to get loot. Personally I prefer to kill mobs, find loot, not play trading simulators, but I'm more than well aware that you disagree totally and consider trading to get loot the best thing ever going and SFL must never happen in PoE, ever in any circumstances. I know that you will never change your mind and will keep fighting any suggestion for a SFL because it will destroy PoE. I think we are just going to keep going in circles with this. I think the only thing we can agree on is that you disagree with my views and I disagree with your views. Edit... " GGG have already got at least one table for increased drop rates made and working. The descent races were all self found, with modified (increased) drop rates to compensate for the fact of no trading Last edited by Jaknet#1426 on Oct 21, 2013, 7:13:17 AM
|
![]() |
" No I wasnt, specifically. Though tweaking drop-rates would be part of balancing a SFL. Because currently everything is balanced around trading. I was just replying to the notion that creating a SFL woud require "reinventing the whole game" and would be "very expensive". Which isnt true, as GGG already has all the tools in place to create new leagues with specific rulesets. SFL would not require more work than "ladder reset" leagues do. The reasons for not doing a SFL are other than technical / financial When night falls She cloaks the world In impenetrable darkness Last edited by morbo#1824 on Oct 21, 2013, 7:34:42 AM
|
![]() |
Well, one option could be to make one of the 4-months leagues self found at some point in the future. I bet they have many ideas for coming leagues, and self found just might be one of them.
|
![]() |
"This doesn't matter one bit, one way or the other. What matters is changing the itemization system so that figuring out which helm is better is actually a choice, and not an automatic, easy-as-fuck appraisal. "It's not about which I prefer, or which you say you prefer, it's about what people prefer. The masses. You give millions of players a choice — play actual ARPG, or play market simulator — and they play market simulator. Now, of course, if you ask them they're going to say they prefer to play an ARPG, because they're here to slay monsters, because that's what sounds good. But when we look at what people actually do — not say, do — we know that a bunch of them are fucking liars, because they choose market simulator. It's the same as when you do surveys asking people what type of coffee they drink: they all say they like a nice, dark roast (and black, too), but when you look at what people actually buy with actual dollars, they go for a mild breakfast-blend crap with cream and sugar. (And this is not speculation on my part.) Now I'm not saying that these people don't prefer the ARPG genre in general over the market simulator genre in general. Actually, it wouldn't make sense otherwise; why buy a game named Diablo if one didn't? But when given the choice between playing that particular ARPG versus playing that particular market simulator, well, the people have spoken. Nobody ever held a gun to anyone's head in Diablo 3 and forced them to use the Auction House — they chose to. The thing that no one wants to really wrap their heads around is: why? Most of the time when you hear explanations, those explanations explain how D3 forced its users to do this and that, but the whole point is that it wasn't force, it was choice. It was an optional option that pretty much everyone opted to opt. The real problem was that they liked the market simulator better, and that something is tremendously fucking wrong when one likes the auction simulator better. So tremendously wrong, in fact, that it's a reality one doesn't want to confront, bound to be denied and repressed. And so it is, also, with PoE. No one is forcing you to trade; the problem is that you want to, you really, really want to, and you know there's something tremendously fucking wrong with that, because you don't like market simulators in general, you like ARPGs in general, so you should want to play the ARPG and not the trading simulator, right? Right? Right. But the problem lies not in the market simulator. When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted. Last edited by ScrotieMcB#2697 on Oct 21, 2013, 8:14:45 AM
|
![]() |
Not sure if any of these have been suggested but here we go:
- Self found should not be a separate league but a part of any league - Trading should be allowed - Items should have a field that shows the name of whoever found the item - If the item is equipped by the same person all the stats on the item should get a bonus, say 10% (bonus should be visible on the item stat sheet) - If the item is traded the name will go blank and the stat bonuses will disappear - For every level gained using only self found items all item stats get a 0.25% bonus to stats (max bonus 25% at level 100), if at any time a non self found item is equipped the bonus disappears forever - Whenever a self found orb is used on a self found item there is a higher percent chance of getting a better result (only for orbs where this makes sense like fusing or orbs that reroll values) Last edited by vaskov17#7159 on Oct 21, 2013, 12:42:36 PM
|
![]() |
" Honestly these are fantastic ideas. +1 to the Vaskov System |
![]() |
nice ideas Vaskov!
+1 |
![]() |
" I disagree this will force people to play self found and give an unfair advantage to self found players. I personally play 99% self found and while I did not ran any high level map (70+) yet I can totally say today that playing self found is viable, the issues self found players are encountering are the same for every single player that does not spend most of its gaming time trading, you will struggle all the same to socket / link your gear and find decent gear. Not because you (and I) like to play self found means that you should force others to do the same, same goes for full time traders. |
![]() |
" Would adding 10%+0.25%/level to all stats in items you found make your character top tier? If the answer is yes then the suggestions are not good. If the answer is no, then these suggestions will bring more balance between traders and self found players. |
![]() |