The Exiled Sale Recipe Book (spoilers)

I dont want to whine but this 'fix' is a big dissapoitment. Whole item pricing and many recipes are tbh.

"

Deathtiny2266 wrote:

4x same name rare "Amber Loop" Rings did not get any results (1 alchi for the 3 and the 4th ring put in some shards) ..

3x same name rare rings = alchi

2x same name rare rings = chance


if someone has additional Amber Loops msg me in Legacy or PM here in the forum.

You must make sure those are all pre patch drops or post patch It's reported that a mix doesn't detect the receipe.

thanks a lot

"

Hilbert wrote:

"

Deathtiny2266 wrote:

4x same name rare "Amber Loop" Rings did not get any results (1 alchi for the 3 and the 4th ring put in some shards) ..

3x same name rare rings = alchi

2x same name rare rings = chance


if someone has additional Amber Loops msg me in Legacy or PM here in the forum.

You must make sure those are all pre patch drops or post patch It's reported that a mix doesn't detect the receipe.

for my 4 i can tell they are .. the 5th one i got most likely is too as i can also do the 2 and 3 combos with it (big tnx to MR_CEE for nr 5!)

5 x same name rare rings = alchi + chance ... so game made 3x and 2x out of it.


If anyone still has an Amber Loop on legacy let me know to do a last test with 6x same name.
Don´t think it will do anything other than 2 alchis - but we will see.

still looking for Legacy Tiger Spar's to check the recipes with items with (possible) quality mods.

"

Deathtiny2266 wrote:

If anyone still has an Amber Loop on legacy let me know to do a last test with 6x same name.
Don´t think it will do anything other than 2 alchis - but we will see.

I have an amber loop for you. Sent you a PM.

big tnx to Facelicker .. now have 6 legacy Amber Loops and they add up to 2x3 = 2 alchis as i feared (or hoped - as 6x would be insane for something like only 1 regal).

Next try will be with 3 amus and 3 rings :)

"

Deathtiny2266 wrote:

Next try will be with 3 amus and 3 rings :)

so you need amulet matches? you can PM me your list to check against my stock.

I agree that rare name matching should go.

"

BRavich wrote:

I agree that rare name matching should go.

+1
I am rather low level but when I read how you're exhausting yourself, I begin to think that I will never use rare-name-matching recipes. It is just ridiculous.

To compare, 3 or 4 rarity types of same item type seems pretty logic and fair.