GZ FranzKafka, First level 100 on nemesis league!

"

ZiggySobotka wrote:

I think it'd be good if there was an advantage gained by playing solo that was appealing, but I can't think of anything particularly good, so I'm not really offended that GGG can't, or won't.

I never saw it this way, you actually had an answer for this, heh.
Unless the game becomes non-online, which is a design decision, playing Solo is never going to be as much advantageous/appealing as playing in a party, interesting.

"

he was lightning warping around rooms while everything instantly died, including bosses

It seems fun to watch! I am going to check vids for sure.

GGG get your shit together.

All this races, events, first to 100 means nothing when only exploits and OP builds 'compete', while the rest of us has to suck through RNG and one-shot desync.

Congrats on first 100 to spoil the fun for everyone involved and finally bring the bug on front cover to be dealt with.


LoL @ 'summoner' build. only 2 specters. no zombie. no skeleton. boss insta-flops.


For better read than this drama thread:

Beating Nemesis without rares or uniques

Admins were very busy removing so many posts from this topic.
I guess the exploit was actually an exploit.

Lets get back to playing the game, shall we?
By my calculation, I will reach lvl 100 on standard league by 2022, that is in 7~8 years :-)
Go! go! go...

Hey Kafka,so many ppl accusing you,maybe you should go to TRIAL :D.GZ on the acheivment!

Whoa, what's with the censorship at the beginning of the thread?

"

Whoa, what's with the censorship at the beginning of the thread?

People exploiting the forums, luckily GGG took swift action before it turned bad on a whole other level.

so many crybabies here its unbelieveable, i congratulate you for reaching level 100 , doesnt matter if you used hacks or not, its still an archievment


wait what did i just say?

obviously its not an archievment, you cheated , you abused , you shall be burned for using a game mechanism.




//


if it is anyone fault, then it is GGGs fault for not testing their stuff good enough before releasing it to the public.

cant blame smart players who use op game mechanics

"

if it is anyone fault, then it is GGGs fault for not testing their stuff good enough before releasing it to the public.

cant blame smart players who use op game mechanics

I agree with point one, i don't agree with point two.

Since it was posted in the Cast on death section by Mark_ggg two weeks ago that an interaction between traps/mines + cod is not allowed to function.

And a top player should have the decency to inform GGG of this instead of playing the tag game with them (as in hiding himself from the public in order to gain the most advantage of this abuse)

Some people lack honor/common sense, it's sad to see this also includes the top-players.
It is possible to compete in the top-ladder and keep your common sense you know?

Nobody is denying that GGG is not at fault here. People are just disappointed that a top-player promotes this kind of behavior.(the "keep it a secret from GGG guys" mentality, you think this will be beneficial for the future of the game ibase?)

Some people seem to misunderstand the disappointment originating from this thread.

It is not a result of finding a very sweet OP gem combo.
It is a result of having the dev's themselves post the gem combo should not function, a top-player finding out a loop-hole to make it function, and then lying to himself that it is properly functioning. While every sign contradict's that.

One post of Mark_GGG in the "cast on death" sub forum section.
http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/547068/filter-account-type/staff

On january 2.

This makes any "i did not know it was an exploit" excuse invalid. since i do believe a top-player knows where the support gem sub-forum is located?....

It still makes GGG at fault here, for allowing a slip-up like that. But it does not invalidate that people can feel disappointed in Havoc's actions given the info related to the subject being public to everybody, including him.

If anything i expected an e-mail to chris or mark about this asking if it is functioning like intended.(you know, some sense of community, respect for the people creating the game you stream?) Instead of stabbing them in the back. I am pretty sure this will impact how they view the current top-players lol.

More strict ladder-rules incoming lmao. And we wont be able to blame GGG for doing so...
Expecting a certain degree of common sense and maturity from there top-players has had bad results, next steps will probably reflect that :).

edit : typo