Nazi symbol in map. (Place were you get chest is in the shape of a swastika)

"

ClaySoldier wrote:

"

FaceLicker wrote:

I see crosses in every single indoor map. I think every perpendicular intersection should be removed because Catholics have commited more heinous acts than other group in the history of mankind. I find the symbols of this abominable organization offensive on every level imagineable.

Ridiculous? So is this thread in my opinion. The swastika is a perfectly accepted symbol in most countries so long as it is not used as a symbol of Nazism. A room in the shape of a swastika, a symbol that predates Hitler by thousands of years, is not indicative of Nazism. This community is quite disappointing as of late with all this prejudical bullshit. I get that people have some sensitivities, but this is getting old quite fast.

1. "Ridiculous" who even said that word?

2. "prejudical bullshit" That symbol means literally millions of lives lost, it does not matter what it used to mean.

3. "I see crosses in every single indoor map. I think every perpendicular intersection should be removed because Catholics have commited more heinous acts than other group in the history of mankind. I find the symbols of this abominable organization offensive on every level imagineable"

I really don't know were to start with that..... the only thing i can think of is the crusades and the death toll (witch maybe totaled 10'000) was mostly of soldiers, it was a war, non prejudice war.

4: "Ridiculous? So is this thread in my opinion. The swastika is a perfectly accepted symbol in most countries so long as it is not used as a symbol of Nazism. A room in the shape of a swastika, a symbol that predates Hitler by thousands of years, is not indicative of Nazism."

I'm not sure you are a catholic, Jew, or any of the others of the sort so maybe you don't understand, it is NOT accepted in any country or religion with Jewish roots with because it means that 9 million innocent people died because they believed in one God.

"

THEHORNEDRAT wrote:

The intention of the OP is to limit freedom of speech.