1.0.0 Balance Changes

Good changes!

Btw, the aura thing is good, because:

1) Right now you can have almost all auras at once (except melee). And the change from flat to percentage mana cost will help melee builds. I think that melee will be able with little bit of experimentation have more auras (it depend on new pasive tree etc...)

2) I can uderstand that solo player are mad about it, but on other hands, if you play solo, you play for yourselfs and you don't have to compare with others... So i think that this ... agravation is little bit unnecessary. Iam solo player too and I simply don't care.

As a solo player, the aura change has me worried.

DO YOU SEE THE FKING NEGATIVE REACTIONS TO AURA BUFFS GGG DO YOU???????????

NOBODY WANTS SOLO NERF AND PARTY BUFF

FACEPALM FACEPALM


NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF NO AURA BUFF

"

parsile wrote:

Good changes!

Btw, the aura thing is good, because:

1) Right now you can have almost all auras at once (except melee). And the change from flat to percentage mana cost will help melee builds. I think that melee will be able with little bit of experimentation have more auras (it depend on new pasive tree etc...)

2) I can uderstand that solo player are mad about it, but on other hands, if you play solo, you play for yourselfs and you don't have to compare with others... So i think that this ... agravation is little bit unnecessary. Iam solo player too and I simply don't care.

This makes no sense, how could melee possibly have more auras with almost everything going to percentage and other auras increasing in cost.

"

Quest rewards for Cruel difficulty onwards have been improved so that you receive more rare items as rewards.

I will simply not complete these quests any more if they're optional. It's never worth it. Quest rares should always be given a minimum number of sockets, 5 for merciless. This has always been the case.

"

Note that even after these increases, you may still get junk from quests rewards and take quite a few Orbs of Fusing to roll the sockets you want!

Nobody is using fusings on mid-level garbage. If a quest rare has bad sockets it's vendor trash. If you want people to use orbs on quest rares, make orbs tiered.

Love those changes :)

When You will post new Passive Skill Tree ?

Aura changes sound awful.

I am very delighted to see these changes. I asked for over half these exact things before.

Much love.

if they are going to do this to auras some gems should be added to reverse blood magic.

IE take the blood magic keystone for your casts and have and anti blood magic gem to put auras back onto mana?

or maybe es?

"

wehrberg wrote:

"

parsile wrote:

Good changes!

Btw, the aura thing is good, because:

1) Right now you can have almost all auras at once (except melee). And the change from flat to percentage mana cost will help melee builds. I think that melee will be able with little bit of experimentation have more auras (it depend on new pasive tree etc...)

2) I can uderstand that solo player are mad about it, but on other hands, if you play solo, you play for yourselfs and you don't have to compare with others... So i think that this ... agravation is little bit unnecessary. Iam solo player too and I simply don't care.

This makes no sense, how could melee possibly have more auras with almost everything going to percentage and other auras increasing in cost.

Example:
Player has 500 mana and using aura with flat mana cost - for example 200. So let's say the mana cost will be changed to 30% of all mana, whitch is 500 * 0,3 = 150.

500 - 200 = 300
500 - 150 = 350

It's just that melee characters, which have generally very small mana pool will take this change much more easily than the ones who has for example 2000:

2000 - 200 = 1800
2000 - (2000 * 0,3) = 1400

Yes it could go either way, depends on exact cost of skills, passive tree, etc...