Since GGG forced lab down our throats, how about some protection from lab carries that quit or die?

"

Fruz wrote:

"

Legatus1982 wrote:

And how the fuck do you propose somebody get 10% of the POE player base to participate in a poll?

Wait ... you mean ... you are .... STARTING TO GET IT ???

Starting? I've always know you were an unreasonable person who won't accept anything other than the unreasonable.

Again, why is lab talked about so much more than all the other issues in POE? Where in your logic does that fall into place?

"

Legatus1982 wrote:

what would it take to convince you that lab is not good for POE?

Achievements completed: 77 of 120

You are not competent enough in PoE to discuss what is good for PoE and what is not.

"

DivineChampion wrote:

"

Legatus1982 wrote:

what would it take to convince you that lab is not good for POE?

Achievements completed: 77 of 120

You are not competent enough in PoE to discuss what is good for PoE and what is not.

Achievements, rofl

Leave troll

"

Legatus1982 wrote:

Exactly the person who needs squelching.

it's hilarious that after all the bs you typed up about allllll sorts of completely irrelevant things, you then advocate censorship.

"

robmafia wrote:

"

Legatus1982 wrote:

Exactly the person who needs squelching.

it's hilarious that after all the bs you typed up about allllll sorts of completely irrelevant things, you then advocate censorship.

Posting factual information about the topic and connecting with real life examples of people being reasonable vs unreasonable

"irrelevant"

You're bordering on the should-be-squelched line yourself sir

I'm interested in the topic in the thread title. But I've just read pages of mud-slinging. Not sure it is a good idea to continue this thread tbh

"

Fruz wrote:

"

Legatus1982 wrote:

And how the fuck do you propose somebody get 10% of the POE player base to participate in a poll?

Wait ... you mean ... you are .... STARTING TO GET IT ???

30-50 people would be completely fine and accurate enough to determine if "most" people don't like the lab, if they could be sampled correctly. I think the OP's post is ridiculous too, those polls are worthless because of sampling, not sample size.

"

DurianMcgregor wrote:

"

Fruz wrote:

"

Legatus1982 wrote:

And how the fuck do you propose somebody get 10% of the POE player base to participate in a poll?

Wait ... you mean ... you are .... STARTING TO GET IT ???

30-50 people would be completely fine and accurate enough to determine if "most" people don't like the lab, if they could be sampled correctly. I think the OP's post is ridiculous too, those polls are worthless because of sampling, not sample size.

How specifically would you sample that poll better

"

InsiderTradingX wrote:

I'm interested in the topic in the thread title. But I've just read pages of mud-slinging. Not sure it is a good idea to continue this thread tbh

That's why I have brought up the topic of squelching. I'm not sure that's really the best thing, but at this point it needs to be discussed. I'd gladly give up my posting rights if it meant Fruz could no longer post here. Something needs to be done about this guy, he has clearly shown he and his friends are not interesting in contributing anything meaningful to discussion about improving the game.

"

Legatus1982 wrote:

"

robmafia wrote:

"

Legatus1982 wrote:

Exactly the person who needs squelching.

it's hilarious that after all the bs you typed up about allllll sorts of completely irrelevant things, you then advocate censorship.

Posting factual information about the topic and connecting with real life examples of people being reasonable vs unreasonable

"irrelevant"

You're bordering on the should-be-squelched line yourself sir

"factual"



deja vu in here