Poll: Should we add Nets that work on Dead Beasts?
Poll: Should we add Nets that work on Dead Beasts?
| |||||||||||||||||
|
wow- I missed the 3 sec window some how. I was in a party of 6 doing the Harvest in act 4. A red beast capture came up, 3 of us died , the rest said leave it , move on, that was after fighting it, no joke, 5 minutes. We ran and moved on.
|
|
" thats a pretty good idea i second this |
|
|
i would prefer some kind of semi-auto mode for hunting
you already need to find particular beast for recipe and you must have appropriate item in your inventory all this "throwing net" mechanic feel awfully clunky and just ruin game-flow totally right now hunting often became so frustrating, that i just exit the game |
|
|
There is absolutely no logical reason to not include these. If you're in maps, you are more than likely one shotting these things from offscreen. Anything to the contrary is specious bullshit.
|
|
|
no, there are already too many types of nets. I'd rather see GGG spend resources on making the nets not take up inventory spots.
|
|
|
I say NO, it would be too cheap and easy. thanks
|
|
|
So all of these people that say NO capturing a corpse makes no sense!!! i am sure they are all playing hardcore because it makes no sense to stand up and fight on when you die right? OR? This vote is just about making life hard for the better/faster players... you should have known that GGG.
|
|
|
I haven't really been having issues with captures beyond accidental one-dunking weaker rares.
usually I forget to throw the net or I hit a performance chunk on my trash PC If it'll make more people happy I guess so, but it seems like it shouldn't be something easy to do or as rewarded, live captures seem far better than re-animation. Less Whining More Grinding
|
|
" This. I really like this idea. |
|
|
No.
Adds a bit for difficulty to the game, so killing stuff faster isn't always better. |
|
