Poll: Should we add Nets that work on Dead Beasts?

Poll: Should we add Nets that work on Dead Beasts?

Yes, but more common
943025.72%
Yes, but more rare
961326.21%
No
1762848.07%
Poll closed
Since the Poll is closed, "Yes, but more rare" won!
Computer specifications:
Windows 10 Pro x64 | AMD Ryzen 5800X3D | ASUS Crosshair VIII Hero (WiFi) Motherboard | 16GB 3600MHz RAM | MSI Geforce 1070Ti Gamer | Corsair AX 760watt PSU | Samsung 860 Pro 512GB SSD & WD Black FZEX HDD
"
Ygidua wrote:
"
Drimli wrote:
"
Well at least the poll proved one thing. Half of the community that visits the forum won't be happy with the proposed changes. Will GGG take that as a sign that they should try to think of a better solution that will make more people happy? 50% is terrible.



But i am sure you would have thought it was totallly fine if you won and 49.9% voted yes... i am sure you wouldn#t have written anything then.... this is how votes work... and btw this is the best result because at least you got the choice not to use the new nets but if you had won the classes and builds in question would have no alternatives... so suck it up.

This is the inclusive result... if you had won it would have been the exclusive result.


Your words are stupid.

If they add dead beast capture, then the whole league is dead. Why should someone fight for a reward, if he could pick it up easily without from the ground?

This is the same crap that we have with trading. It is so easy to just visit a third party website, buy BIS items and steamroll content without ever putting any effort into it. That is, why the game has become so problematic for casuals. If they refuse to trade, they can not win at this game, while those that trade, cheat their way to success and always complain about the game being to easy.

Funnily enough, once GGG adds a mechanic that makes those whiners happy, you complain again that it is now too hard for you.

Gosh, this is so funny if it wouldn´t be so sad. Blizzard ruined WOW and D3 with catering to elitists and GGG will ruin POE as well.


Wait, there's a way to "win"? I thought the game was about getting loot and killing shit? If you shortcut to the best loot than you've eliminated half the purpose of the game.
Computer specifications:
Windows 10 Pro x64 | AMD Ryzen 5800X3D | ASUS Crosshair VIII Hero (WiFi) Motherboard | 16GB 3600MHz RAM | MSI Geforce 1070Ti Gamer | Corsair AX 760watt PSU | Samsung 860 Pro 512GB SSD & WD Black FZEX HDD
No: In this case, we'll keep the current capture mechanics how they are.
Some builds are terrible at catching beasties, some are better. This league sucks for all those with shitty builds, aka Totems, SRS, ED, minions...
The mechanics work well for melee to capture beasts, but for ranged and others - not so well.

My build does not allow me to catch beasts easy, so I think if the mechanics dont change it will be the shortest league.

From comments everywhere a lot of people comparing it to the worst Harbinger league, but imho that's a compliment.

Please do something about capture mechanics. Ty.
I think it's rather comfortable for GGG to let the players cagefight out between two bad choices.
Either way obviously about one half of played builds was not considered appropriatly designing the league.

Beastiary related challenges need awareness, further (augmented maps) challenges speed as always.
"
Querne wrote:
...
Either way obviously about one half of played builds was not considered appropriatly designing the league.

...


This is most important part of this discussion for me. GGG has failed to properly review and test their design, which turned out to be very problematic for certain builds. They gave the community 2 bad choices and let players to duke it out in a poll, which one will be implemented.

I´ve read many great proposals in this thread, how a good system to capture could be implemented.
Unfortunately GGG decided to use a system that´s no fun to me. And now they propose a "fix" I dislike even more.
Seems this league will be a short one for me.
Luckily the helmet (the only challenge MTX I really want) is the first one you get.
I think we do not need to break the gamemechanics by implementing such nets that can rssurect. My wishes would be:

1. Make rare mobs having at least 5x, better 10x more life.
2. increase the spawnrate of red ones dramatically. have played all days long and havent seen an endgame boss. How are we supposed to do the endgame grind if we play solo?
GGG if you ask people what they want, do it as a result.

Stop introducing any non-standard solutions. This is called bias - if the first item voted less than N% of the votes we will not be taken into account.

You are in a standard voting system with three options.The most popular answer is the winner.

I think you have already understood the number of negative reviews that misinterpret the result.
"
Drimli wrote:
"
Well at least the poll proved one thing. Half of the community that visits the forum won't be happy with the proposed changes. Will GGG take that as a sign that they should try to think of a better solution that will make more people happy? 50% is terrible.



But i am sure you would have thought it was totallly fine if you won and 49.9% voted yes... i am sure you wouldn#t have written anything then.... this is how votes work... and btw this is the best result because at least you got the choice not to use the new nets but if you had won the classes and builds in question would have no alternatives... so suck it up.

This is the inclusive result... if you had won it would have been the exclusive result.


No, as I said in the post you just quoted, they should be looking for a better solution. There was no correct answer in the poll.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info