Donald Trump and US politics

"
...his mentally void army of trumplets will fawn over him with misguided compliments. His ego is monstrous in size and equally thin.

For a minute there you sounded like 2012 while referencing Obama. My mistake.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▒▒▒▒░░░░░ cipher_nemo ░░░░░▒▒▒▒ │ Waggro Level: ♠○○○○ │ 1244
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Last edited by cipher_nemo on Nov 10, 2017, 12:35:47 PM
Glad you caught your mistake. Obama is sure of himself. Never requires constant ego stroking like you know who.
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
"
Jennik wrote:
Oh look, another non-racist hating on the (((globalists))). How wonderful. What fine, upstanding cultists Trump has. Only the best people.

Prepare to die... of a heart attack brought on by pure raw disgust. I'm kidding, obviously, but you might want to sit down before Googling.

Can you die of irony overdose? Holy shit XD
Devolving Wilds
Land
“T, Sacrifice Devolving Wilds: Search your library for a basic land card and reveal it. Then shuffle your library.”
Scrotes, what exactly do you believe I misunderstood there?

"
Brett J. Talley, President Trump’s nominee to be a federal judge in Alabama, has never tried a case, was unanimously rated “not qualified” by the American Bar Assn.’s judicial rating committee, has practiced law for only three years and, as a blogger last year, displayed a degree of partisanship unusual for a judicial nominee, denouncing “Hillary Rotten Clinton” and pledging support for the National Rifle Assn.

On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee, on a party-line vote, approved him for a lifetime appointment to the federal bench.


And, as always, Republicans are absolute dogshit. The recent rape apologetics were also fun. I especially enjoyed reading about how victims of sexual assault should be prosecuted.
Last edited by Jennik on Nov 10, 2017, 4:20:11 PM
All i can say is i'm totally against socialism no matter in what ever form or interpretation, in fact it never ever brought anything good for mankind (Nazis, Communists etc.)

- Best Signature Ever -
Last edited by BestUsernameEver on Nov 10, 2017, 6:10:28 PM
"
All i can say is i'm totally against socialism no matter in what ever form or interpretation, in fact it never ever brought anything good for mankind (Nazis, Communists etc.)


The Nazis were socialists in the same way the DPRK is democratic. In name only. That claim is so blatantly absurd that you should ask yourself how you were even capable of believing it, then work super fucking hard to avoid making that same mistake in the future.

You're also flat wrong about the benefits of socialism. All you have to do is look at socialized medicine in many countries to see that your claim that socialism "never ever brought anything good" is complete horseshit. A tiny bit of research will show you mountains of other benefits socialism has given people.
"
Jennik wrote:
"
All i can say is i'm totally against socialism no matter in what ever form or interpretation, in fact it never ever brought anything good for mankind (Nazis, Communists etc.)


The Nazis were socialists in the same way the DPRK is democratic. In name only. That claim is so blatantly absurd that you should ask yourself how you were even capable of believing it, then work super fucking hard to avoid making that same mistake in the future.

You're also flat wrong about the benefits of socialism. All you have to do is look at socialized medicine in many countries to see that your claim that socialism "never ever brought anything good" is complete horseshit. A tiny bit of research will show you mountains of other benefits socialism has given people.


As much as people like to diss Hitler, he did implement many social programs that better the life of Germans. However, Hitler isn't socialist. He hated socialism and communism.
"
Jennik wrote:
"
All i can say is i'm totally against socialism no matter in what ever form or interpretation, in fact it never ever brought anything good for mankind (Nazis, Communists etc.)


The Nazis were socialists in the same way the DPRK is democratic. In name only. That claim is so blatantly absurd that you should ask yourself how you were even capable of believing it, then work super fucking hard to avoid making that same mistake in the future.

You're also flat wrong about the benefits of socialism. All you have to do is look at socialized medicine in many countries to see that your claim that socialism "never ever brought anything good" is complete horseshit. A tiny bit of research will show you mountains of other benefits socialism has given people.


Hitler was a 100% devoted socialist, i know it might cause some inner struggle to accept this fact not only because the media likes to suggest it otherwise but well it's a fact, there are also plenty of essays and documentaries about his social programms.

The S in the NSDAP isn't there by accident.

There is also a slight difference between being social and being a socialist, i mean sure you can be both but one is a purely personal characteristic and the other one is a political ideology.

- Best Signature Ever -
Last edited by BestUsernameEver on Nov 10, 2017, 8:38:41 PM
"
deathflower wrote:

However, Hitler isn't socialist. He hated socialism and communism.


Hitler was an @ssh0le but that's a popular misconception that he hated socialism (communism is based on socialism btw. and is not a standalone ideology) there are even plenty of speeches of him on youtube where he confesses to socialism.

Did you know that Hitlers fascist friend Benito Mussolini held always active letter contact with his firend Joseph Stalin? :)
- Best Signature Ever -
Last edited by BestUsernameEver on Nov 10, 2017, 8:36:55 PM
BUE, what would change your mind? There are countless sources I could link, but I feel confident you'd just handwave them away as "fake news." What would allow you to accept the fact that you're wrong about this?

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info