Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support DONE!!!!!

"

Xavathos wrote:

Meanwhile, in Wraeclast...

Another day, another Lab run.

Some people like when they get hurt, they called masochists, lol

"

Zloberik wrote:

"

Xavathos wrote:

Meanwhile, in Wraeclast...

Another day, another Lab run.

Some people like when they get hurt, they called masochists, lol

If that was true, I'd be thanking you for that weak attempt at a personal insult. Lol.

"

mark1030 wrote:

You've convinced me turtle. You're scientific method in proving your theories as facts is every bit as legit as having moon rocks as proof we landed on the moon.

Don't know what you're talking about but there are three things that make moon rocks different from earth rocks. They are made of the same basic elements but are different in that they form in
1. lighter gravity
2. little oxygen
3. very dry conditions

https://www.spaceanswers.com/q-and-a/how-different-is-moon-rock-and-earth-rock/

"

Xavathos wrote:

"

Zloberik wrote:

"

Xavathos wrote:

Meanwhile, in Wraeclast...

Another day, another Lab run.

Some people like when they get hurt, they called masochists, lol

If that was true, I'd be thanking you for that weak attempt at a personal insult. Lol.

Nono, thats not an insult, its nothing wrong with being masochistic a bit. All of the Dark Souls players are, for instance, thats ok.

"

Zloberik wrote:

Nono, thats not an insult, its nothing wrong with being masochistic a bit. All of the Dark Souls players are, for instance, thats ok.

Alright then. Back to the lab.

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

mark1030 wrote:

You've convinced me turtle. You're scientific method in proving your theories as facts is every bit as legit as having moon rocks as proof we landed on the moon.

Don't know what you're talking about but there are three things that make moon rocks different from earth rocks. They are made of the same basic elements but are different in that they form in
1. lighter gravity
2. little oxygen
3. very dry conditions

https://www.spaceanswers.com/q-and-a/how-different-is-moon-rock-and-earth-rock/

Finally you have proof of something! You don't think that proof is more verifiable than your method of using account age and supporter titles displayed to determine which accounts are alts? (You're the one who compared people not believing in a moon landing and people not believing your proof). Do you not see one case has scientifically verifiable proof and one case is merely assuming that their non-provable (by us, not by GGG) evidence is correct?

"

mark1030 wrote:

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

mark1030 wrote:

You've convinced me turtle. You're scientific method in proving your theories as facts is every bit as legit as having moon rocks as proof we landed on the moon.

Don't know what you're talking about but there are three things that make moon rocks different from earth rocks. They are made of the same basic elements but are different in that they form in
1. lighter gravity
2. little oxygen
3. very dry conditions

https://www.spaceanswers.com/q-and-a/how-different-is-moon-rock-and-earth-rock/

Finally you have proof of something! You don't think that proof is more verifiable than your method of using account age and supporter titles displayed to determine which accounts are alts? (You're the one who compared people not believing in a moon landing and people not believing your proof). Do you not see one case has scientifically verifiable proof and one case is merely assuming that their non-provable (by us, not by GGG) evidence is correct?

I never claimed what you're saying. That is ridiculous. You and Shovelcut took a statement that there was proof that the list of almost 700 account names could not reasonably represent a handful of people and went off the deep end. That is all fine and good, just an apparent misunderstanding until you guys tried to turn it into a smear against my character. Now please stop.

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

mark1030 wrote:

"

Turtledove wrote:

Don't know what you're talking about but there are three things that make moon rocks different from earth rocks. They are made of the same basic elements but are different in that they form in
1. lighter gravity
2. little oxygen
3. very dry conditions

https://www.spaceanswers.com/q-and-a/how-different-is-moon-rock-and-earth-rock/

Finally you have proof of something! You don't think that proof is more verifiable than your method of using account age and supporter titles displayed to determine which accounts are alts? (You're the one who compared people not believing in a moon landing and people not believing your proof). Do you not see one case has scientifically verifiable proof and one case is merely assuming that their non-provable (by us, not by GGG) evidence is correct?

I never claimed what you're saying. That is ridiculous. You and Shovelcut took a statement that there was proof that the list of almost 700 account names could not reasonably represent a handful of people and went off the deep end. That is all fine and good, just an apparent misunderstanding until you guys tried to turn it into a smear against my character. Now please stop.

Actually, our argument is based on the statement you've made that you have personally verified all accounts on this list and that is definitive proof that there are only 3 or 4 alts on the list. It's not a mark against your character, it's a mark against your data gathering methods and the way you're presenting this rhetoric as factual data when it's actually just your opinion.

"

Shovelcut wrote:

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

mark1030 wrote:

Finally you have proof of something! You don't think that proof is more verifiable than your method of using account age and supporter titles displayed to determine which accounts are alts? (You're the one who compared people not believing in a moon landing and people not believing your proof). Do you not see one case has scientifically verifiable proof and one case is merely assuming that their non-provable (by us, not by GGG) evidence is correct?

I never claimed what you're saying. That is ridiculous. You and Shovelcut took a statement that there was proof that the list of almost 700 account names could not reasonably represent a handful of people and went off the deep end. That is all fine and good, just an apparent misunderstanding until you guys tried to turn it into a smear against my character. Now please stop.

Actually, our argument is based on the statement you've made that you have personally verified all accounts on this list and that is definitive proof that there are only 3 or 4 alts on the list. It's not a mark against your character, it's a mark against your data gathering methods and the way you're presenting this rhetoric as factual data when it's actually just your opinion.

Please stop your silly nonsense. I never claimed the things you keep accusing me of. You said that I was being deceitful among other things. Please stop telling lies about what I said. I responded to Lagwin that I had done an analysis of every single account and said exactly what that analysis was and said yes there was proof that the list of almost 700 account names could not reasonably represent a handful of people. You and Mark1030 then falsely claimed/misunderstood it as a ridiculous statement that I had verified every single account was a separate person. That is beyond ridiculous. I never said that. Please stop telling that stupid lie.

Turtle, I am telling you this for your own good: You are too easily baited.

If individuals post trash comments, and especially if they do it systematically over a long period of time, the best response is not to respond.

So when the next wave of nonsensical posts lands, know this: You have no face to lose to those two. Don't respond to it. You can acknowledge that it is bullshit in subsequent posts communicating with actual on-topic posters, but don't respond directly to those individuals.

Doing this will allow the thread to get back on topic.