Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support DONE!!!!!

You've convinced me turtle. You're scientific method in proving your theories as facts is every bit as legit as having moon rocks as proof we landed on the moon.

I tried to make my post clearer.

Your nonsense has gone beyond ridiculous.

"

Turtledove wrote:

I did my stated analysis on each individual account. Which is stated right there but you conveniently snipped it out. Now if I was a judgemental jerk I could say you did it on purpose to be deceitful but I don't really believe that I think it more likely you made a mistake.

I did snip it out on purpose, for the same reason that I snipped those quotes even further, because you just don't get it.

Your analysis is meaningless rhetoric that serves no purpose other than to make your thread seem more legit. This is the only thing we've actually been discussing for this entire conversation. This is how you're being deceptive and dishonest especially since you claim you're trying to be transparent in your approach to maintaining this thread.

Edit: and also your use of threads that have no place in this thread, and the addition of obvious alts to the total number of people posting. Just to make that clear...

Meanwhile, in Wraeclast...

Another day, another Lab run.

"

Xavathos wrote:

Meanwhile, in Wraeclast...

Another day, another Lab run.

Some people like when they get hurt, they called masochists, lol

"

Zloberik wrote:

"

Xavathos wrote:

Meanwhile, in Wraeclast...

Another day, another Lab run.

Some people like when they get hurt, they called masochists, lol

If that was true, I'd be thanking you for that weak attempt at a personal insult. Lol.

"

mark1030 wrote:

You've convinced me turtle. You're scientific method in proving your theories as facts is every bit as legit as having moon rocks as proof we landed on the moon.

Don't know what you're talking about but there are three things that make moon rocks different from earth rocks. They are made of the same basic elements but are different in that they form in
1. lighter gravity
2. little oxygen
3. very dry conditions

https://www.spaceanswers.com/q-and-a/how-different-is-moon-rock-and-earth-rock/

"

Xavathos wrote:

"

Zloberik wrote:

"

Xavathos wrote:

Meanwhile, in Wraeclast...

Another day, another Lab run.

Some people like when they get hurt, they called masochists, lol

If that was true, I'd be thanking you for that weak attempt at a personal insult. Lol.

Nono, thats not an insult, its nothing wrong with being masochistic a bit. All of the Dark Souls players are, for instance, thats ok.

"

Zloberik wrote:

Nono, thats not an insult, its nothing wrong with being masochistic a bit. All of the Dark Souls players are, for instance, thats ok.

Alright then. Back to the lab.

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

mark1030 wrote:

You've convinced me turtle. You're scientific method in proving your theories as facts is every bit as legit as having moon rocks as proof we landed on the moon.

Don't know what you're talking about but there are three things that make moon rocks different from earth rocks. They are made of the same basic elements but are different in that they form in
1. lighter gravity
2. little oxygen
3. very dry conditions

https://www.spaceanswers.com/q-and-a/how-different-is-moon-rock-and-earth-rock/

Finally you have proof of something! You don't think that proof is more verifiable than your method of using account age and supporter titles displayed to determine which accounts are alts? (You're the one who compared people not believing in a moon landing and people not believing your proof). Do you not see one case has scientifically verifiable proof and one case is merely assuming that their non-provable (by us, not by GGG) evidence is correct?