Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support DONE!!!!!

"

Xtorma wrote:

We have no plans at this time to change the lab...is pretty specific.

Xtorma is correct. To provide a more complete context for the statement: the statement was a few months ago. It was also immediately followed by the statement that Chris was not against making a change to it.

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

Xtorma wrote:

We have no plans at this time to change the lab...is pretty specific.

Xtorma is correct. To provide a more complete context for the statement: the statement was a few months ago. It was also immediately followed by the statement that Chris was not against making a change to it.

The statement was more about not opposed to offering an alternative way to get AC points, then changing the lab. Obviously I rather see the lab get changed then offer the AC points anywhere else. But the same people posting over and over about how they hate the lab isn't going to help get a change or have any affect on the situation at all.


So can I ask again @turtle if they don't change the lab what are you going to do in 2.4?

I approve of this thread and I feel it should be stickied and regularly updated until it sinks in.

I'll leave to your pondering exactly which parties it needs to sink in with.

"

goetzjam wrote:

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

Xtorma wrote:

We have no plans at this time to change the lab...is pretty specific.

Xtorma is correct. To provide a more complete context for the statement: the statement was a few months ago. It was also immediately followed by the statement that Chris was not against making a change to it.

The statement was more about not opposed to offering an alternative way to get AC points, then changing the lab. Obviously I rather see the lab get changed then offer the AC points anywhere else. But the same people posting over and over about how they hate the lab isn't going to help get a change or have any affect on the situation at all.


So can I ask again @turtle if they don't change the lab what are you going to do in 2.4?

I'll say the same thing again. Making any promises to an Internet troll would just elevate them above what is deserved. I suggest that you try a bit harder to focus on the topics and statements being made and not concern yourself so much with the people making those statements.

"

Turtledove wrote:

I'll say the same thing again. Making any promises to an Internet troll would just elevate them above what is deserved.

Now you know how GGG feels and why they haven't promised you anything.

"

mark1030 wrote:

"

Turtledove wrote:

I'll say the same thing again. Making any promises to an Internet troll would just elevate them above what is deserved.

Now you know how GGG feels and why they haven't promised you anything.

Care to explain what puts Turtledove on the level of an Internet troll for me?

"

TheLastZica wrote:

"

mark1030 wrote:

"

Turtledove wrote:

I'll say the same thing again. Making any promises to an Internet troll would just elevate them above what is deserved.

Now you know how GGG feels and why they haven't promised you anything.

Care to explain what puts Turtledove on the level of an Internet troll for me?

Mostly a joke. But spamming the same feedback over and over in thread after thread is what I would call trolling. I don't think Turtle fits that category, but there are others who do. I respect Turtle's opinion even though I disagree with it.

"

mark1030 wrote:

"

TheLastZica wrote:

Care to explain what puts Turtledove on the level of an Internet troll for me?

Mostly a joke. But spamming the same feedback over and over in thread after thread is what I would call trolling. I don't think Turtle fits that category, but there are others who do. I respect Turtle's opinion even though I disagree with it.

Eh. They at least have a point with it, and one which is being rather obstinately ignored. There are things being spammed of which that cannot be said... <looks over at CI thread>

We're up to 231 threads listed now.

There has also been an update on the much appreciated "donated" analysis on the thread authors. There's 182 total accounts responsible for 222 threads. Of the 28 accounts with multiple threads, those 28 thread authors account for 65 of those threads.

I've noticed that the new threads seem to encourage a lot of posts from new never posted before authors. I guess the new threads do provide some service then. Although I still discourage people that have already created threads from creating more threads on the topic. Regards,

What is the latest tally count on lab threads?