Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support DONE!!!!!
|
duplicate post
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired! Last edited by Turtledove#4014 on Aug 4, 2017, 4:49:22 PM
|
|
|
duplicate post
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired! Last edited by Turtledove#4014 on Aug 4, 2017, 4:48:17 PM
|
|
|
How you are able to misunderstand almost everything is still a mistery to me I have to say :
- I haven't played FoO yet, but the lab changes ( as I said before, more than once ) seem pretty good. - No, what GGG did is not similar at all to those silly suggestions 2 and 7. However, GGG has actually done something that I had suggested, so I'm pretty happy about it. - I am not against GGG improving the lab at all, I am against GGG spending a significant amount of resources doing something pointless such as an alternative way of ascending .... you know, the whole BS that you and your crusader friends have mostly been fighting for this whole time. - The only upsetting thing here is .... you, trying to spread blatant lies as I pointed out again. SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading. Last edited by Fruz#6137 on Aug 4, 2017, 11:02:45 PM
| |
" You're the silly liar here Fruz. It is absolutely ridiculous to say that it is a delusional lie that 2 and 7 are similar to what was done. The delusional person here is you continuing to push such silliness. Your only argument was that 2 said to get rid of all traps. That is still similar to getting rid of most traps. And 7 doesn't even say to get rid of all traps. Yet you stick to your totally silly idea that the ideas are SO different that I'm a delusional liar. You're being a troll or you're extremely narrow minded, not sure which. Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
|
|
|
lab is shit
|
|
" Why don't you start to stop talking purely from your **** someday ? I mean, why don't you try to speak about something that you have actual knowledge of instead, someday ? Your bad faith knows no limit, I hope that you will finally at some point do the "new" labs, realize that it's the same, only shorter in normal and a bit in cruel, and come to the realization that your crusade has led basically nowhere, and actually face the fact. With a little bit of luck, that could spare the forum of part of that unnecessary crusade ... Those suggestions you mentioned are not what has been done by GGG, the 2 first lab have only been shortened. Period. Btw, the 7th suggestion of "rework" of that joke of a thread was :
Spoiler
7)Traps lead to chest and other rewards, and non trap areas lead to Izaro.
You still need to go through traps to reach Izaro. Do I have to really point out every single lie that you are throwing around ? really ? SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading. Last edited by Fruz#6137 on Aug 5, 2017, 12:50:11 AM
| |
" Now I understand your problem. You think the definition of "similar" means identical to. Dearest Fuz, I'll guess that you're not an English speaking native but your English is actually quite good so I forgot. Although your obnoxious hyperbole of accusing me of being a delusional liar can't be blamed on English, so you have some other issues as well. I'll take you at your word that it is not about being upset because GGG improved labyrinth. So I guess it might be something deeper below the obvious surface. Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
|
|
|
It is not "similar" enough to be called "similar", and this is not splitting hairs.
I just showed you, that the 7th suggestion was nothing like what has been done, at all. It isn't even remotely similar in any way. But I guess that there is no way that I can "reason" you, oh well .... time will, at some point. As long as others are understanding this and are not getting baited by you, I guess the harm you're doing is only to yourself, so that's fine. SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading. Last edited by Fruz#6137 on Aug 5, 2017, 5:43:34 AM
| |
" It has been shown that they are in fact similar and that calling me a delusional liar is being obnoxiously silly. It's definitely true that there is no reasoning with your ilk. Although I do admit that it's been fun trying. Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
|
|
|
Oops [Removed by Turtledove]
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired! Last edited by Turtledove#4014 on Sep 15, 2017, 3:27:54 PM
|
|
