Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support DONE!!!!!

"

mark1030 wrote:

And of those 750, many made feedback that was addressed like trap damage to ES and account wide trials. Can't let that number go down. Being honest about people who have problems with the lab in 2.6.0 might not trick GGG into listening.

"

Saltygames wrote:

You can argue about numbers all day long, the fact is this thread exists and is maintained by more than one person. 133 pages speaks alot. It's up to GGG if they want to take this feedback seriously or not

"

ewolow wrote:

"

Saltygames wrote:

You can argue about numbers all day long, the fact is this thread exists and is maintained by more than one person. 133 pages speaks alot. It's up to GGG if they want to take this feedback seriously or not

I posted a subreddit on this as well. I got lambasted by the fanbois, which was basically 2-3 people trying to post a lot to make it look like a lot more.

My post was generally to ask the devs to take a peek here an check out the lab posts.

"

Shagsbeard wrote:

The boss fight is too unforgiving. Pop. Dead. Nothing to learn. No way to avoid. Pop.

"

j33bus wrote:

"

ewolow wrote:

The devs at least say they do, but they don't post because they think that it derails threads. Also in the recent Q&A they basically said they're not changing it.

I don't think they said exactly that. I think they said that Lab was going to be in 3.0, however, they recognize the fact that ascension is no longer considered a reward, but rather an intrinsic part of character builds and as such, they will be having further discussion on it.

"

This is discussed occasionally but there are no plans to change it in 3.0.0. We're worried about the slippery slope of players wanting the rewards from a system without engaging in that system (although we do understand that Ascendancy classes have been so successful that they are no longer considered rewards but instead intrinsic parts of your character). I am sure we will continue to discuss this and related topics.

"

Tin_Foil_Hat wrote:

Oh look, removing the context thats actually important trying to further this drivel.

"

This is discussed occasionally but there are no plans to change it in 3.0.0. We're worried about the slippery slope of players wanting the rewards from a system without engaging in that system (although we do understand that Ascendancy classes have been so successful that they are no longer considered rewards but instead intrinsic parts of your character). I am sure we will continue to discuss this and related topics.

Its pathetic how far you guys go to change the context of what was actually said in the exact context it was said in lmao.

"

Fistaniderya wrote:

How many times have you seen 750 people gather for anything in this game? That should give you an idea. By far the most people who play the game will never look at Feedback & Suggestions, especially not regularly to see this thread. This is a shoutout to a problem which many silent players would agree if ever asked.