Donald Trump

Something aside from the "CIA" false flag


We've all heard of tragic drownings of people trying to get to Europe. And it really is tragic. But is that sense of compassion that Europe is extending being taken advantage of?

The human whirlpool - 40,000 people almost drown but are rescued,
almost

http://tinyurl.com/zk2yws2

http://preview.tinyurl.com/zk2yws2

original site and full link below the spoiler

"

DalaiLama wrote:

"

Antnee wrote:

"

Xavderion wrote:

Libs saying this story is bigger than Watergate: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-cyber-russia-idUSKBN13Z02Q?il=0

First of all there is no proof that there a direct ties to Kremlin. But even if it's true, I don't really get the outrage. The US haven't only "influenced" politics in the past, they literally overthrew democratically elected governments many times. What Russia allegedly did is really, really harmless in comparison.

Hi, Trump supporter. You're complicit in treason, and I enjoy watching you twist in the wind trying to downplay it.

All of you nameless, treasonous Trump supporters deserve the shitshow that will be the next 4 years. Hope it's your families that suffer, not mine. The EC would do well to do it's job and deny this puppet the white house.

Is this the same CIA that told the world Iraq had WMD? Or is it the CIA that organized the Bay of Pigs? Given the numerous times the MSM has embarassed itself with outright falsehoods and misdirection, do we have any official confirmation of this "secret" meeting, or are we supposed to just trust them this time?

Oh, you're right to be cautious, Trump supporter. Better get back to flailing your arms about Pizzagate or whatever unfounded dumbfuckery wikileaks shits into your mouth this week.

I see what you are. Your selective skepticism (and blatant copy/pasting from your fellow faceless Trump Automatons) is fucking hilarious, Trump supporter.

duplicate post deleted

"

Antnee wrote:

I see what you are.

You see only what you want to see, and that vision appears to be more clouded by anger than sharpened by reason atm.

You don't see the possibility that you are being lied to by organizations that have lied before. You don't see that the CIA has the motive, the means and opportunity to twist the truth here. You don't see that if they can win over enough support they might get a serious budget increase.

The CIA lacks definitive data on the leaks because they were couriered. How do I know that? By what the CIA and Obama is not telling us, when they could otherwise easily tell us.

The guilty ones in the CIA have six weeks to retire or face prosecution. Gowdy will show them no mercy at all.

"

DalaiLama wrote:

You see only what you want to see, and that vision appears to be more clouded by anger than sharpened by reason atm.

As yes, Trump Supporter #4, the shining paragon of reason. Give me a fuckin break. You have no claim to "reason", and neither do any Trump Supporters. None.

Pizzagate = real, but CIA? Well lets just wait and see what the evidence is

Comey's word = truth, but CIA? Well hang on lets not be so hasty

Your hypocrisy isn't surprising anymore, it's more a matter of curiosity. It's interesting to see how far you take this shit, and still claim that you're the cooler head here.

Hey, hows that Goldman Sachs Swamp? Warm? Comfy? Thank god Trump never gave any speeches to wall street, I mean who knows what he'd do if he won the...

...oh

"

soneka101 wrote:

"

solwitch wrote:

Trump won for two reasons, the ability to have monetary means to support his campaign (impressive) and because voting for trump meant we were giving the finger to the system. A clear reflection that the American people won't put up with bullshit even if it costs us our own destruction.

I don't agree with your first reason, I don't think that having money helped President Trump. Hillary spent way more money than him with ads and still lost.

I think he won partially because he dominated the news, and besides at some point people started seeing him as a underdog and we all know that people love that.

I agree ☺️

"

Antnee wrote:

You're complicit in treason

I really hope you're not a lawyer :P

"

Antnee wrote:

Comey's word = truth, but CIA? Well hang on lets not be so hasty

I don't believe a thing Comey says. He clearly had enough to indict Clinton back in June, didn't, says "I found new stuff!" in October, few days later says "nope, still nothing." He's either idiotic or corrupt, and a flip-flopper. He deserves contempt from both sides of the aisle.

If anything, it's the oddness surrounding Comey, Lynch, Clinton and Obama which makes me skeptical of the CIA. They also pushed through the bullshit "WMDs in Iraq" story back during Bush's time, so CIA as political bullshit factory isn't a new or solely Democratic thing. It seems like the FBI is compromised, so why not other agencies too? Fire 'em all.

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

"

Antnee wrote:

Comey's word = truth, but CIA? Well hang on lets not be so hasty

I don't believe a thing Comey says. He clearly had enough to indict Clinton back in June, didn't, says "I found new stuff!" in October, few days later says "nope, still nothing." He's either idiotic or corrupt, and a flip-flopper. He deserves contempt from both sides of the aisle.

If anything, it's the oddness surrounding Comey, Lynch, Clinton and Obama which makes me skeptical of the CIA. They also pushed through the bullshit "WMDs in Iraq" story back during Bush's time, so CIA as political bullshit factory isn't a new or solely Democratic thing. It seems like the FBI is compromised, so why not other agencies too? Fire 'em all.

"The rules permitted State Department officials to use non government email as long as appropriate records were preserved. It was widely known within government that she had a personal email account. She emailed department accounts on expectation that records would be retained.

September 2013 -- National Archives and Records Administration clarifies that personal email can only be used in "emergency situations" and that emails from personal accounts should be captured and managed in accordance with agency record-keeping practices.

2014 -- The State Department requests that all former secretaries of state "submit any records in their possession for proper preservation."




The subpoena was specifically asking for documents pertaining to Libya and the attacks on the facility in Benghazi, documents which, along with tens of thousands of others, she had already given to the Department of State.

The subpoena publicized by Gowdy had specifically asked about Benghazi-related emails that Clinton had already given to the State Department when the subpoena arrived in March.

July 7, 2015 -- CNN's Brianna Keilar has an exclusive interview with Clinton. In response to being asked about deleting 33,000 emails while under investigation by a House panel, Clinton says other secretaries of state had done the same thing. Clinton also says she was never subpoenaed by the House.




Her staff deleted her emails not Hillary. The employee made that decision on his own. The FBI found no evidence that the emails were deleted deliberately to avoid the subpoena. Clinton agrees to turn over her private email server and a thumb-drive backup to authorities. The server was previously wiped of data, but FBI officials are confident that the data from it will be able to be recovered."


Shameless copy and paste.

Did you look up the facts? What would Hillary be indict for?