Self-Found (League) [Thread outdated!]
|
.double
Last edited by DijiGo#2281 on Sep 9, 2013, 11:16:30 PM
|
|
|
Hey GGG, please make a self-found league, just to shut these [removed] up.
Last edited by Michael_GGG#0000 on Sep 10, 2013, 5:42:37 AM
|
|
" Insulting people is bad, someone should really remove that. Im offended. Also, its nice to see you have finally seen the light. IGN Last edited by Michael_GGG#0000 on Sep 10, 2013, 5:43:01 AM
|
|
" Rest assured, the feeling is mutual. Last edited by Michael_GGG#0000 on Sep 10, 2013, 5:43:31 AM
|
|
|
You fools have no idea about me, and how I roll.
Winning FTW!!! |
|
|
so, when does selffound league start so that i can enter my vacation formular @ work
"Path of nurfs" - LVL 100 + LVL 100 + LVL 100 ENDGAME REAVER
"1.3.0 Path of nurfs 3. expansion" Shops: 1031762,774343,883462,371756,1091096,1099789,1260674 Reaver Videos: https://www.youtube.com/user/velo1337/videos |
|
|
They don't have to change a thing for SF people to enjoy the game.
Every "valid point" in this thread is a QQ for easier gear upgrades, which you don't need if you know how to play the game. If you do know how to play the game and don't enjoy it, then find something to do with your time that you enjoy. |
|
" I believe we've heard this before, lots of times! It was a failed argument then and it fails just as well now. But thanks :) |
|
" Crafting is never going to be easier than trading, so suggesting that they want EASIER upgrades in a league that would inevitably be HARDER is hilariously stupid. I imagine if you had thought about what you were typing for even a fraction of a second you would understand that but ohwell. IGN
|
|
|
It seems that the discussion is stagnating heavily.
I fail to see many fresh points and constructive feedback is also lacking. I could however be wrong. If that is the case, don't hesitate to tell me. I will try to make the Thoughts&Feedback corner in my 5th post more appealing to read. If someone has a good idea concerning this, don't hesitate to PM me or post about it. My ideas so far: *Name the links with "one-liner", something like post titles. *Include small abstracts to each link. I doubt I can fit the complete posts rather than using links. Post limits and such. Once I finished that off, I will suggest support to close the thread after consoling senior staff. I will still update this thread with interesting cross-thread references. I just don't see any point in going around in circles in here anymore. Thank you for the participation everyone, you made this very thread possible. |
|
