3.0.0 Beta Performance Improvements

"

Aias_o_Telamonios wrote:

Ok so now:

BRING BACK THE MJOLNER !!!!!

afaik it's still in the game. and it's proc time was reduced cause it overloaded the servers. these current improvements are purely client side

Thats was a supperp news !!!

"

Bekari wrote:

Please do something with overheating, caused by turning off v-sync, i have GTX970 G1, with v-sync on (everything else on max), 1920x1080, my Gpu is under 43-45C temp, with V-sync off, fps goes over 300, which makes GPU burn, temps are near 80C
it's not airflow problem in case, or cooling problem of any kind, that is how game works

If your system is not capable to keep the temp of your gpu in specified range, then this IS a cooling issue. (any other situation that consumes the full gpu power would cause the same).

Dont know exactly about gpu, but I know that for (some) cpu's 80°C wont even by out of spec.

Since the game doesnt offer a adjustable value for the vsync, the only option you have to scale it woud be to use an external tool to set your desired syncrate (an limiting the gpu load with this) while switching the ingame vysnc to off.

Came to say #bringCoCback, but someone already said something along these lines on the first page :p

Also keep up the great work, I highly look forward to 3.0! I also hope you guys sneak in some new non-support skillgems last minute. :D

but test pc is alot better than my potato with 2 ram 9500gt gpu ((. Why GGG don't test performance on minimum specs that is on game page in steam ??

Windows XP SP3/Vista/Windows 7/8
x86-compatible 1.4GHz or faster processor
2 GB ОЗУ
GeForce® 7800 GT or ATI Radeon™ X1950 Pro or better

"

stan88 wrote:

but test pc is alot better than my potato with 2 ram 9500gt gpu ((. Why GGG don't test performance on minimum specs that is on game page in steam ??

Windows XP SP3/Vista/Windows 7/8
x86-compatible 1.4GHz or faster processor
2 GB ОЗУ
GeForce® 7800 GT or ATI Radeon™ X1950 Pro or better

Think with you. GGG do must get their game run on a watch like Diablo 2. I have one that Diablo 3 run good, Torchligh 2 runs perfect, recent Titan Quest just runs awesome, but as for PoE... it run aweful.

APU 3400, amd, 8 gigs o' ram, rotated hdd 5400 rpm, radeon hd 6520G yeah this is some mobile notebook claimed to be game ready... back to 2011. =) But! Any other game runs good execept for PoE.

"

Windows XP SP3/Vista/Windows 7/8
x86-compatible 1.4GHz or faster processor
2 GB ОЗУ
GeForce® 7800 GT or ATI Radeon™ X1950 Pro or better

That are requirements to run PoE launcher :P

Come on people,an i5 is the most typical cpu for gaming.
Even a 2500 is enough.
1050ti is an 150€ gpu.
I fully understand people that cannot afford a new pc and are stuck with very old specs,but the pc used to demonstrate the improvements is low tier among gaming rigs.
It's a nice baseline so you can know what to expect from your rig.
I have an i5 2500 and a 7850 and i expect 20-25% less improvement than shown in the video.
Still an improvement though.

"

PsOfOs wrote:

Come on people,an i5 is the most typical cpu for gaming.
Even a 2500 is enough.
1050ti is an 150€ gpu.
I fully understand people that cannot afford a new pc and are stuck with very old specs,but the pc used to demonstrate the improvements is low tier among gaming rigs.
It's a nice baseline so you can know what to expect from your rig.
I have an i5 2500 and a 7850 and i expect 20-25% less improvement than shown in the video.
Still an improvement though.

Agreed. No money, no honey. And spexx o' my comp doesn't allow me play PoE at full throttle. Since then I switched/tend to TQ-AE or TL2. I've spent a lotta money to PoE in hope they do something that allow me to run GGG's game on my toaster. Well, according to this video they did it. Let us see how it will be in reality. If it IS, then they will get some buxx off me. If not, hmmm... Hail the king, baby!

"

PsOfOs wrote:

Come on people,an i5 is the most typical cpu for gaming.
Even a 2500 is enough.
1050ti is an 150€ gpu.
I fully understand people that cannot afford a new pc and are stuck with very old specs,but the pc used to demonstrate the improvements is low tier among gaming rigs.
It's a nice baseline so you can know what to expect from your rig.
I have an i5 2500 and a 7850 and i expect 20-25% less improvement than shown in the video.
Still an improvement though.

Not everyone lives in countries with a good salary level, for some 150-200$ it's a monthly salary.

I do not blame the GGG, but why they write such system requirements then, and test the game on a computer that is at least 5 times more powerful ???