unique items *no longer updated*

"
Britannicus wrote:
Is the flavor text a quote from Game of Thrones (or Song of Ice and Fire)? Just curious.

I'm positive that is. And Bronn? Too obvious.
"
NagiSoi wrote:
Still wondering if you would do more damage with rf (pure hp/hp regen) and some spells or without rf but going normal route (some hp/spell damage/cast speed nodes and such).
Well the best thing about RF, is the freedom. You could use Freeze Pulse, Firestorm, Ethereal Knives, or any new Spell that gets added in the future, without needing to respec. And the AoE burn damage of RF is significant too.

It's fun because of the freedom and it's cool :P

I think that RF would do more damage than a normal Spell build for the most part.
IGN: Golem_Antsy, Harvest
i wouldn't even be using rf by 65 so i see no problem :p
IGN: Bainling
I hope its a summoning flask ><
IGN JimansNotSummoner
"
Emil_kof wrote:
The problem is that this shield is lvl65...you basically have to get to lvl65 as a non-righteous fire build, until you can use this...unless you want to try using righteous fire when it's not negated, which I think is annoying and just not that effective.


This RF build would be using spell instead of the RF damage. Standing close to mobs with only <1% regen is really a bad idea. Normal spell + Iron Will can lvl you up easily while being tanky
Unviable build tester.
Fuse mechanics:
http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/21503
95% Crit Build Without Charges [0.10.1c]:
http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/172438
I'm disappointed, it sounds less cool if the shield doesn't stop rigteous fire on low life. Then it's just a no brain righteous fire shield...
Build of the week #2 : http://tinyurl.com/ce75gf4
"
Serefkana wrote:
"
NagiSoi wrote:
Still wondering if you would do more damage with rf (pure hp/hp regen) and some spells or without rf but going normal route (some hp/spell damage/cast speed nodes and such).
Well the best thing about RF, is the freedom. You could use Freeze Pulse, Firestorm, Ethereal Knives, or any new Spell that gets added in the future, without needing to respec. And the AoE burn damage of RF is significant too.

It's fun because of the freedom and it's cool :P

I think that RF would do more damage than a normal Spell build for the most part.
I could probably find the answer in some keystone thread. But I either just don't understand how to search this forum. Or it is just really really hard to search on this forum.


Anyway, have you tried anything like shield charge or whirling blades with RF? Lightning Warp? specifically, whether you deal noticable damage when you move fast.

Probably too risky. But that sounds fun to me.
Why am I wearing a heavy belt if I haven't got any pants?
"
Progammer wrote:
"
Emil_kof wrote:
The problem is that this shield is lvl65...you basically have to get to lvl65 as a non-righteous fire build, until you can use this...unless you want to try using righteous fire when it's not negated, which I think is annoying and just not that effective.


This RF build would be using spell instead of the RF damage. Standing close to mobs with only <1% regen is really a bad idea. Normal spell + Iron Will can lvl you up easily while being tanky
Yeah, either a tanky Iron Will + LMP Freeze Pulse, or an Elemental Cleaver until you can use RF. Even without the Shield and an ES oriented RF build, you wouldn't be able to use RF till 60+ anyway.

@Above: Well with 8-12k hp, RF would burn for 4-6k hp/sec. And when you go in for melee you'd pop your Ruby Flask, so your regen wouldn't be low anymore. But mostly you'd use spells with the buff from RF.
IGN: Golem_Antsy, Harvest
Last edited by Sheriff_K#3938 on Mar 27, 2013, 9:22:42 PM
So it's safe to say the fourth unique is a flask or a map? Considering everything else has been found within minutes in previous patches.
IGN: Narbays
Does RF procc EE if yes i have a pretty nice build idea

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info