Announcements - New 0.11.6 Content and a Research Survey - Forum

" tinko92 wrote: It's worthless if it's endurance charge on stun when you stun a monster, you lose way too much DPS or leech when you can already get charges with enduring cry. You lose DPS when you use enduring cry instead of attacking a monster. ;)	Posted by Epikur#7768 on Sep 20, 2013, 8:48:44 AM Quote this Post
Toward the 2 infamous questions being discussed, I answered "No", I would not pay to have my ideas, big or small, implemented into the game. This is not because I don't want to support GGG, but because this type of thing has no place in the design and development of a video game.	Posted by Galtrovan#5344 on Sep 20, 2013, 8:49:14 AM Quote this Post
Nooooooo, not Clarissa. Her voice is fucking beautiful :(	Posted by Stroggoz#2475 on Sep 20, 2013, 8:49:16 AM Quote this Post
Get Melissa Joan Hart to voice Clarissa so that the "Clarissa Explains it All" references can come full circle. kthx	Posted by teacherpeter#1699 on Sep 20, 2013, 9:10:51 AM Quote this Post
i also have completed the survey. i am expecting the results from the Faculty of Economics at the University of West Bohemia. GGG is the best dev team in the world, from my point of view	Posted by minusunu#1760 on Sep 20, 2013, 9:16:58 AM Quote this Post
Just completed the survey. Awesome guys.	Posted by glockenrock#3942 on Sep 20, 2013, 9:29:48 AM Quote this Post
Optimizations! Hurrah! stop over moderating that makes the official forums useless	Posted by bchan#3151 on Sep 20, 2013, 9:43:41 AM Quote this Post
" Hilbert wrote: Why do I have the bad feeling that the game will end up in PAY TO CHANGE? The survey got questions like "Are you willing to pay to minor/major changes of the game" And in future that will mean: Minor change 15.000 $ major change 1.000.000 $. So if you pay GGG 1million bucks you will get an AH for example? Or we make the game worse on purpose so players gonna pay to make it good. Once that happens the game is going to fail hard. First a horrible OB with so many horrible nerfs it made PoE an instanced MMO then advertisement footprints. Once pay to change it will fail. I would pay if I could have my own league with own settings and OWN CODING, this includes changes in the passive tree. But I won't pay to have changes in the main game because the main game is damaged beyong repair. I guess strangely enough I saw those questions in a completely different light. I understood it as: "Would be willing to pay how much if the game was going the way you wanted?" which is rather different. In other words, if my suggestions keep getting heard, would I then give money? which is quite fair. There is the risk of turning everything into a fragmented mess, but I still would pay to have the no-trade, non-competitive, offline version (without all the trade tied drop rate bs) of the game	Posted by tsmonteiro#6775 on Sep 20, 2013, 9:52:31 AM Quote this Post
Wow... A lot of creativity went into the new aura effects, huh? Bring back the old auras already, I'll pay double! IGN Ken__Kaniff	Posted by Knightmare101#0485 on Sep 20, 2013, 10:10:14 AM Quote this Post
I do not personally like the new aura skull animations. I did the survey to help out. Yay! IGN: ImmortalFang	Posted by Z0D#1393 on Sep 20, 2013, 10:15:22 AM Quote this Post