News Part II

"

The_Reporter wrote:

"

Jgizle wrote:

Its funny giving lab haters hope.

So, you admit that your posts are nothing other than SPAM for the amusement of your own twisted agenda?

You should be probated from the forum permanently if that's your only purpose.

Reported.

And what is the purpose of this thread? It's not news and it's not feedback. You should report the OP as well.

"

Jgizle wrote:

Also dont mix me up with that cliqué, i am fine with lab never changing. It guarantees I will always be in business with lab carries, and i will always be making more profit than any one mapping.

You went to all that trouble to try to look French-chique (copy-paste accent aigu and all), and you forgot to spellcheck. Sigh.

Your incentives for not wanting the lab fixed so that everyone can enjoy it are disgusting, by the way.

It seems obvious to me by this post (and others like it posted by you) that you are happy with a lower-quality game, so long as it brings you profit personally. That makes you an enemy of GGG, in my opinion. Your goals are in direct opposition to theirs.

"

sidtherat wrote:

you (as in the clique - you all know who you are) had a chance early on - but youve ruined it all with aggressive spam, harassment, shit eating analogies, berating anyone who did not agree with you, insulting devs from time to time and by being a general PITA
youve managed to alienate people who were supporting your case because they 'dared' to not agree with everything you wanted. good way to make friends..

It's kind of hilarious seeing a post by sidtherat, of all people, criticising the berating of anyone who does not agree. Oh delicious irony.

@OP
I think you are being overly harsh on GGG's decision to stay silent. This forum has become a cesspool (even worse than reddit in some ways). Can you blame them for waiting until the last minute to make any significant balance/content-change announcements?

"

Jgizle wrote:

Yeah gj a list that says 15 people are totally against lab, and a list with 200 people saying they dislike 1 aspect of lab. Every name with a + at end is fine with lab as is.

Hence less than 200 people dislike lab. Take note some of those names are duplicates of the above list. Finally take note that changing 1 aspect of lab does not advocate for total dislike of lab.

See this is the difference between you and I. You dont take time to read those persons posts, you just read an overview presented to you and take it as fact.

There is few players who hate lab. Most people like lab and want 1 thing changed. 1 is either traps or ac points, but mostly traps. Which can be fixed without changing lab at all, and is likely the only change that will ever occur.

No the difference is that one of us can accept the facts and one of us selectively reads (and deliberately changes the actual numbers listed when quoting) to support his own profit program.

"

Jgizle wrote:

... i am fine with lab never changing. It guarantees I will always be in business with lab carries, and i will always be making more profit than any one mapping.

I already knew this was your motivation for keeping lab, just didn't have proof before. Thanks for providing it, you can make your exit now.

I remember when we had literally thousands of pages about people wanting SSF league. That vocal minority is now mostly silent.

"

mark1030 wrote:

And what is the purpose of this thread? It's not news and it's not feedback. You should report the OP as well.

Op has shown that ggg is silent on this issue despite having lost their reason to be that way. It is in fact, feedback.

"

Xavderion wrote:

I remember when we had literally thousands of pages about people wanting SSF league. That vocal minority is now mostly silent.

You really believe people play poe in parties more than they do solo?

This is exactly the kind of stuff that tells me you people can't be reasoned with.

It's funny how everything that gets talked about that you don't like is a vocal minority, you got any proof of that claim tough guy? Any of you have any proof at all?

"

Legatus1982 wrote:

"

Xavderion wrote:

I remember when we had literally thousands of pages about people wanting SSF league. That vocal minority is now mostly silent.

You really believe people play poe in parties more than they do solo?

This is exactly the kind of stuff that tells me you people can't be reasoned with.

It's funny how everything that gets talked about that you don't like is a vocal minority, you got any proof of that claim tough guy? Any of you have any proof at all?

Pot:kettle much?

You interpreted something said to fit YOUR agenda and what YOU wanted to bitch about. He mentions SSF, you go on about party vs solo play, which is not the same topic at all.
Then you follow it with condescending comments which you think somehow proves that you are right.

Bravo.

"

Namcap wrote:

"

Legatus1982 wrote:

"

Xavderion wrote:

I remember when we had literally thousands of pages about people wanting SSF league. That vocal minority is now mostly silent.

You really believe people play poe in parties more than they do solo?

This is exactly the kind of stuff that tells me you people can't be reasoned with.

It's funny how everything that gets talked about that you don't like is a vocal minority, you got any proof of that claim tough guy? Any of you have any proof at all?

Pot:kettle much?

You interpreted something said to fit YOUR agenda and what YOU wanted to bitch about. He mentions SSF, you go on about party vs solo play, which is not the same topic at all.
Then you follow it with condescending comments which you think somehow proves that you are right.

Bravo.

Remind us all what SSF stands for, please. :)

Rofl

I can't make up this kind of stuff if I tried

I wonder if he really doesn't know what SSF means...