Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support DONE!!!!!

Essence was my first league playing PoE and the lab was one of my favorite parts.

IMO there is a lot too much RNG involved in getting access to UberLab but if it really bothered me I could have solved this with other player interactions.
"
5P4RK4 wrote:
Essence was my first league playing PoE and the lab was one of my favorite parts.

IMO there is a lot too much RNG involved in getting access to UberLab but if it really bothered me I could have solved this with other player interactions.


Great! I'm sincerely pleased that you enjoy the game and liked labyrinth.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
"
Turtledove wrote:
I suggest that it might show a little bit of thoughtfulness for others in your future posts if you used the URL tag. It is really very easy to do and makes it a lot easier for people reading your post to follow. Thank you.


Really though?

Unless you're using an extremely out of date web browser or for some reason you're using the forum on a smart phone or tablet, all it takes is a double click to select the link and a right click.



No screenshot for IE, who uses that these days anyway? :P

@Emphasy: Nice try but considering the reply you got has the same block of text copy/pasted twice in the same reply, it's a pointless and fruitless venture trying to question why some of these links are in the op.

Just a lowly standard player. May RNGesus be with you.
I use an iPad so not having a hyperlink sucks. It's hard to even copy just the url unless you first go to edit the post. So half the time I don't bother looking at urls that aren't clickable.
Guild Leader The Amazon Basin <BASIN>
Play Nice and Show Some Class www.theamazonbasin.com
"
mark1030 wrote:
I use an iPad so not having a hyperlink sucks. It's hard to even copy just the url unless you first go to edit the post. So half the time I don't bother looking at urls that aren't clickable.



Yeah, and as I said "unless you're using a smart phone or tablet"...

And if you are using one of those, do you honestly expect every poster to cater to your device? Are you actually trying to do meaningful browsing on a device that obviously the site isn't optimized to work for? Does that makes someone who doesn't use url tags less thoughtful?

Just a lowly standard player. May RNGesus be with you.
"
Shovelcut wrote:
"
mark1030 wrote:
I use an iPad so not having a hyperlink sucks. It's hard to even copy just the url unless you first go to edit the post. So half the time I don't bother looking at urls that aren't clickable.



Yeah, and as I said "unless you're using a smart phone or tablet"...

And if you are using one of those, do you honestly expect every poster to cater to your device? Are you actually trying to do meaningful browsing on a device that obviously the site isn't optimized to work for? Does that makes someone who doesn't use url tags less thoughtful?



Shovelcut, thank you for the tips for desktop browsers.

The point here, I think, is that clicking "URL" at the top of the edit box should be super easy. I dare say even easier than following your wonderful tips and yes someone familiar with the "URL" at the top of the edit box that still refuses to use it is being less thoughtful than someone caring more about readers trying to follow the thread and allowing them to just click on a link.

"
Shovelcut wrote:
@Emphasy: Nice try but considering the reply you got has the same block of text copy/pasted twice in the same reply, it's a pointless and fruitless venture trying to question why some of these links are in the op.


I do admit that I was a bit frustrated in Emphasy's apparent assumption that the only purpose of the list was his assumed purpose rather than the explicitly stated purpose that I copied twice into my response from the OP. Note that this was after I had already suggested that he actually try reading the OP before trying to respond to the OP.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
"
Shovelcut wrote:
"
mark1030 wrote:
I use an iPad so not having a hyperlink sucks. It's hard to even copy just the url unless you first go to edit the post. So half the time I don't bother looking at urls that aren't clickable.



Yeah, and as I said "unless you're using a smart phone or tablet"...

And if you are using one of those, do you honestly expect every poster to cater to your device? Are you actually trying to do meaningful browsing on a device that obviously the site isn't optimized to work for? Does that makes someone who doesn't use url tags less thoughtful?

I don't expect every poster to cater to my device. But it'd be nice if they properly formatted their post. Just like using the image tags or the quote tags or the spoiler tags. Is that really so much to ask?

P.S. I can't imagine it's a small number of people who use mobile devices to browse the forums. Shit, if I'm at my computer, there are a lot of other things I would be doing before sitting there reading these forums, including actually playing.
Guild Leader The Amazon Basin <BASIN>
Play Nice and Show Some Class www.theamazonbasin.com
"
mark1030 wrote:
"
Shovelcut wrote:
"
mark1030 wrote:
I use an iPad so not having a hyperlink sucks. It's hard to even copy just the url unless you first go to edit the post. So half the time I don't bother looking at urls that aren't clickable.



Yeah, and as I said "unless you're using a smart phone or tablet"...

And if you are using one of those, do you honestly expect every poster to cater to your device? Are you actually trying to do meaningful browsing on a device that obviously the site isn't optimized to work for? Does that makes someone who doesn't use url tags less thoughtful?

I don't expect every poster to cater to my device. But it'd be nice if they properly formatted their post. Just like using the image tags or the quote tags or the spoiler tags. Is that really so much to ask?

Yeah I think it is. Not everyone knows how forum software works. In fact, in my time playing this game in large guilds I've learned there are some extremely computer illiterate people playing PoE. lol

"
mark1030 wrote:
P.S. I can't imagine it's a small number of people who use mobile devices to browse the forums. Shit, if I'm at my computer, there are a lot of other things I would be doing before sitting there reading these forums, including actually playing.


Oh, I'm browsing the forums quite a bit on my android phone but I'm not expecting to do any meaningful posting with it. It's a shame the forum doesn't auto-detect urls and auto-tag them.
Just a lowly standard player. May RNGesus be with you.
/signed

Trap damage and Izzy are basically the difficulty. At 51, running through labs (NORMAL) with wife and we're miserable. Giving up to continue grinding Cruel and come back when we've got enough regen to actually deal with this (likely level ~70).


-Hate
"
Hateborne wrote:
/signed

Trap damage and Izzy are basically the difficulty. At 51, running through labs (NORMAL) with wife and we're miserable. Giving up to continue grinding Cruel and come back when we've got enough regen to actually deal with this (likely level ~70).


-Hate


Thank you for posting your opinion. You were addition number 646 to the list in the OP.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info