Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support DONE!!!!!
" Not true Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
|
|
" This is true, and it can be observed easily enough. I think it points to a more insidious result of the labyrinth's introduction, however: If you are OK with "divisive content," you are by implication OK with a divided community and, in this case, a divided community which is openly hostile to one another. That seems to be the labyrinth's greatest legacy, and it's quite obviously horrible for any game, let alone a f2p one. I would be surprised if Chris hadn't already rethought his original position that highly controversial content which is hated by a vocal portion of the playerbase is perfectly fine in Path of Exile (or any other game). Wash your hands, Exile!
|
|
" The whole world seems after you, be careful man, they could be anywhere, watch out ! SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
| |
" Here's a nice ad hominem to demonstrate your point for you. Nice of you to do that, Fruz. Wash your hands, Exile!
|
|
" My pleasure /lol ( you should probably look a bit into what ad hominem actually means ) SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
| |
" It is Latin for "to/toward the man" and refers to attacking a person's character, usually to distract from the message that person was saying. Implying that someone has delusions comparable to those held by paranoid schizophrenics and that their statement therefore has no legitimacy is a classic example of an ad hominem. This is exactly what you did. If you had an ounce of self awareness (and also knew what the phrase meant yourself), then you would know that already. <-- See? This is an example of an ad hominem. This time directed at you, just for fun, and to help deepen your understanding of the term. You're welcome! Wash your hands, Exile! Last edited by gibbousmoon#4656 on Jul 19, 2016, 2:07:21 AM
|
|
|
...aaaaand they started closing down lab threads XD ROFLcopter.
Your thread is probably the first summery the ever saw about the lab hate. They probably didn't bother to make their own, because its just a minority after all. XD "This is a Buff"
------------------------------- There is an old almost forgotten prophecy, that hell will freeze over. But we just recently discovered the true cause of this unlikely event: By the time GGG manage to balance their game. |
|
|
You should bump all lap threads to front page *g*
|
|
" But you still don't get why it does not apply in this case ? So you can write down an approximate definition, but not comprehend it ? The whole post seems like paranoia, so I was replying according the content of the post, whatever the user, the answer would have been the same ( which is basically, the difference between ad hominem and not ad hominem, would you have said it, you would have gotten the exact, same, answer ). So you indeed seem to be in the case that you cannot apply a definition to understand its actual meaning and application, sad. Ad Hominem means using elements outside of the content of a message, elements related to the user. You're welcome, np. SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading. Last edited by Fruz#6137 on Jul 19, 2016, 3:26:16 AM
| |
" some players would shitstorm about anything, if there would be no labyrinth they would shitstorm about low drop rates, overpowered bosses, one shot deaths and so on. wait, in fact they did. as a consequence one can now stand in the torture chamber's boss' lighning beam without dying. nice achievement, really. age and treachery will triumph over youth and skill!
|
