"
Pyrokar wrote:
Exactly Fruz, the game has gone off course. You are on a roll today identifying every single problem in a matter of seconds. Congrats!
Well, that's a good one.
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
|
Posted byFruz#6137on Jul 17, 2016, 5:46:42 AM
|
"
Fruz wrote:
No.
There are here changes that would need significant development time, period.
This is not an accurate thing with a given development time, but it would be significant, that I can tell you.
No, you can't. You do not have the necessary information to make an informed statement regarding the work undertaken by GGG. The best you can do is make uninformed guesses. To insist these statements are substantive just makes you look foolish.
"
I just explained you ( no need for a big explanation there ) why this is just completely different from implementing a new league ( some more details : a new league is an instance of something, and even if you tweak the parameters it could at the end just be an instanciation ) is a completely different thing and you just answered with "No", which leads me to think that you have no idea what it actually is about.
No, you didn't. You simply repeated your earlier statements, which are nothing more than assumption.
"
I don't care if you don't believe me, it does not matter, I tried to take some time to answer your message, but if you don't give a damn about mine, I just don't care then.
Once you start providing evidence for your statements, I'll choose whether or not to believe it, but while you continue to make silly statements regarding things of which you have no direct knowledge, there is nothing to believe or otherwise.
|
Posted byKellog#5737on Jul 17, 2016, 7:03:49 AM
|
The work in creating a new league is the game play changes that they might decide to implement in the new league. But just creating a new league should be trivial. For an example, doing the 3-d art for a unique item would probably be more work than creating a new league. Caveats: While I have plenty of programming experience, I have never worked on graphic art type stuff nor have I ever worked on game programming. Although the argument about not implementing a self-found league because it would splinter the population doesn't make sense to me because you'd think self-found players would have very little interaction anyway. So, there is probably other reasons like the effort to disable trading but still allow partying.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
|
Posted byTurtledove#4014on Jul 17, 2016, 7:56:39 AM
|
"
Turtledove wrote:
The work in creating a new league is the game play changes that they might decide to implement in the new league. But just creating a new league should be trivial. For an example, doing the 3-d art for a unique item would probably be more work than creating a new league. Caveats: While I have plenty of programming experience, I have never worked on graphic art type stuff nor have I ever worked on game programming. Although the argument about not implementing a self-found league because it would splinter the population doesn't make sense to me because you'd think self-found players would have very little interaction anyway. So, there is probably other reasons like the effort to disable trading but still allow partying.
It was just one argument, there are other reasons why they do not want it, surely.
"
Kellog wrote:
Ouuhh this is going to get so constructive again :
Yes I can.
You're welcome.
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
|
Posted byFruz#6137on Jul 17, 2016, 8:22:59 AM
|
"
Fruz wrote:
"
Turtledove wrote:
The work in creating a new league is the game play changes that they might decide to implement in the new league. But just creating a new league should be trivial. For an example, doing the 3-d art for a unique item would probably be more work than creating a new league. Caveats: While I have plenty of programming experience, I have never worked on graphic art type stuff nor have I ever worked on game programming. Although the argument about not implementing a self-found league because it would splinter the population doesn't make sense to me because you'd think self-found players would have very little interaction anyway. So, there is probably other reasons like the effort to disable trading but still allow partying.
It was just one argument, there are other reasons why they do not want it, surely.
"
Kellog wrote:
Ouuhh this is going to get so constructive again :
Yes I can.
You're welcome.
Your ability to reason has obviously left you, so I'll leave you to your not-so-well informed reality.
|
Posted byKellog#5737on Jul 17, 2016, 8:34:27 AM
|
"
Kellog wrote:
Your ability to reason has obviously left you, so I'll leave you to your not-so-well informed reality.
Please
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
|
Posted byFruz#6137on Jul 17, 2016, 11:26:30 AM
|
Who needs facts when you assumptions work even better, right?
Tired of trolls? Ignore them.
https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/1473168
|
Posted byAlbinosaurus#7360on Jul 17, 2016, 11:36:42 AM
|
How about an immune to damage over time flask?
I'm a forum warrior, i was born to post, raised to defend my league. Now my post has been removed, chained and exiled by mods who Ban. Ban is my brother; i do not fear it. I see it in the eyes of men and beasts that i troll. It will take me to play the actual game when i am ready and i am not ready.
|
Posted byPyrokar#6587on Jul 17, 2016, 11:38:03 AM
|
"
Albinosaurus wrote:
Who needs facts when you assumptions work even better, right?
I'm sorry, I thought you were ignoring me ?
The guy has nothing better than "No you can't" whatever I say, so I guess all I need to do is to throw "yes I can" ;]]].
Sorry for calling captain obvious, one more time ....
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
|
Posted byFruz#6137on Jul 17, 2016, 11:44:52 AM
|
"
Fruz wrote:
"
Turtledove wrote:
The work in creating a new league is the game play changes that they might decide to implement in the new league. But just creating a new league should be trivial. For an example, doing the 3-d art for a unique item would probably be more work than creating a new league. Caveats: While I have plenty of programming experience, I have never worked on graphic art type stuff nor have I ever worked on game programming. Although the argument about not implementing a self-found league because it would splinter the population doesn't make sense to me because you'd think self-found players would have very little interaction anyway. So, there is probably other reasons like the effort to disable trading but still allow partying.
It was just one argument, there are other reasons why they do not want it, surely.
Yes, but we got off topic a bit there. Yes, there are some options in the OP that would be lots of work, I'm sure. Only one of the options would need to be implemented to "fix" the problem though. GGG could much better evaluate what among the options, including their own ideas, would work the best.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
|
Posted byTurtledove#4014on Jul 17, 2016, 1:24:14 PM
|