Donald Trump and US politics

"
Donnerdrummel wrote:
However, this is not about preventing people with mental problems from entering the military, it is about shutting and keeping out transgender people without considering their respective mental status.

What if "transgenderism" is in fact the mental issue, which causes the observed high suicide rates, would you be ok if they are barred from the military, as a group, on this basis?

I do not believe, for a second, that the suicide rates are caused by the environment (people not accepting transgenders), because if that was so, we would have to observe the same high suicide rates among other groups that have been "discriminated" in the past, like eg. gays a decade or two ago.
When night falls
She cloaks the world
In impenetrable darkness
I think there are, broadly speaking, two types of transgender people:
1. those suffering under the illness of gender dysphoria, a rare but severe neurological/hormonal condition where one's self-perception of their own gender is in conflict with the reality of their sex, and
2. those who are not suffering in this way, and simply think it would be cool to be the other sex.

The biggest problem with the transgender movement is that those in group #2 attempt to infiltrate group #1. One can tell the left supports this because individuals truly belonging to group #1 can be verified via empirical testing — abnormal brain chemistry leaves physical evidence. Screenings could be conducted to objectively verify known physiological causes of gender dysphoria and prescribe to such people, and only such people, medically necessary treatments. However, the Left resists this, preferring instead that all claims of gender dysphoria go unchallenged, untested, and unchecked.

For those who do not suffer from gender dysphoria yet choose to be transgender, there is no medical urgency and procedures are cosmetic. That said, they should be at full liberty to modify their bodies however they choose, providing they pay for it themselves. Such "trans women" have no more claim to health insurance covering their boob job than a cisgender woman has for her boob job to be so covered... and no less of a right to buy one on the free market.

While I have no objection with non-dysphoric transgendered persons serving in the US military per se, I staunchly oppose any public funding of their hormone or sex reassignment procedures, and frankly I'm against any hormone therapy while on active duty whatsoever (while in reserves may be okay, or maybe not, I don't know). However, as a prerequisite for this acceptance, the afforementioned issues involving screening for dysphoria and differentiating the dysphoric from the non-dysphoric must first be resolved within the healthcare profession; prior to such reform, the impact on military healthcare would be an unacceptable clusterfuck.

At its core, however, being a non-dysphoric trans person is a matter of desire, not physical reality. Merely identifying as wanting to be a sex other than your current sex is but thoughts, and we shouldn't reject soldiers on the basis of "thought crime." Prohibitions should focus on the behaviors of sex change, not on speech. Claiming transgender on Facebook shouldn't get one kicked out of the Army.

For those who suffer from gender dysphoria, I sincerely acknowledge their victimhood, but the US military is not the place for victims. Such people should not be allowed entry into the armed forces.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
Last edited by ScrotieMcB#2697 on Jul 28, 2017, 2:18:38 PM
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
I think there are, broadly speaking, two types of transgender people:
1. those suffering under the illness of gender dysphoria, a rare but severe neurological/hormonal condition where one's self-perception of their own gender is in conflict with the reality of their sex, and
2. those who are not suffering in this way, and simply think it would be cool to be the other sex.

The biggest problem with the transgender movement is that those in group #2 attempt to infiltrate group #1. One can tell the left supports this because individuals truly belonging to group #1 can be verified via empirical testing — abnormal brain chemistry leaves physical evidence. Screenings could be conducted to objectively verify known physiological causes of gender dysphoria and prescribe to such people, and only such people, medically necessary treatments. However, the Left resists this, preferring instead that all claims of gender dysphoria go unchallenged, untested, and unchecked.

For those who do not suffer from gender dysphoria yet choose to be transgender, there is no medical urgency and procedures are cosmetic. That said, they should be at full liberty to modify their bodies however they choose, providing they pay for it themselves. Such "trans women" have no more claim to health insurance covering their boob job than a cisgender woman has for her boob job to be so covered... and no less of a right to buy one on the free market.

While I have no objection with non-dysphoric transgendered persons serving in the US military per se, I staunchly oppose any public funding of their hormone or sex reassignment procedures, and frankly I'm against any hormone therapy while on active duty whatsoever (while in reserves may be okay, or maybe not, I don't know). However, as a prerequisite for this acceptance, the afforementioned issues involving screening for dysphoria and differentiating the dysphoric from the non-dysphoric must first be resolved within the healthcare profession; prior to such reform, the impact on military healthcare would be an unacceptable clusterfuck.

At its core, however, being a non-dysphoric trans person is a matter of desire, not physical reality. Merely identifying as wanting to be a sex other than your current sex is but thoughts, and we shouldn't reject soldiers on the basis of "thought crime." Prohibitions should focus on the behaviors of sex change, not on speech. Claiming transgender on Facebook shouldn't get one kicked out of the Army.

For those who suffer from gender dysphoria, I sincerely acknowledge their victimhood, but the US military is not the place for victims. Such people should not be allowed entry into the armed forces.


Point 2 isnt true at all and i stopped reading there. I got trans friends and am active in the community.
"
ImmaPokemon wrote:
"
Schmodderhengst wrote:
Examination is enough, if you trust examinations in general.

So we remain here with different opinions as usual.

Btw the reasons for higher numbers of suicide attemps seem to be rejection by the family, society etc. ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5178031/ ).

So this is absolutely going the wrong direction.

If this was about money, there could be other solutions, not even mentioning, easy to imagine.


Its not about money, the US military has a bigger budged than all other countries combined. Its about discrimination.


Think of the good side. If they ban transgender, they should ban women. You can introduce the conscription. Not enough people for war, Yo!
"
morbo wrote:
I do not believe, for a second, that the suicide rates are caused by the environment (people not accepting transgenders), because if that was so, we would have to observe the same high suicide rates among other groups that have been "discriminated" in the past, like eg. gays a decade or two ago.


https://cola.unh.edu/sites/cola.unh.edu/files/student-journals/P12_Schaaff.pdf

The SAME high rates ? If you notice you want to change your gender being like 11 to 14 years old ? You must be joking.

Btw calling someone "antifa" is typical only for ONE group of people. And why "discriminated" in brackets ?
Last edited by Schmodderhengst#7293 on Jul 28, 2017, 4:20:39 PM
"
ImmaPokemon wrote:
Point 2 isnt true at all and i stopped reading there. I got trans friends and am active in the community.
cool signalling bro
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
How fake news reports on things they don't really want to report:

-they somehow make it about Trump doing something over the top
-they make it seem that the guy the story is about is entirely irrelevant
-they don't mention the DNC in the title

Spoiler
GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
Yawn...
BB Reince...

edit : my last post here will be "BB Donald" one fine day...
Last edited by Schmodderhengst#7293 on Jul 28, 2017, 5:16:37 PM
"
Schmodderhengst wrote:
BB Reince...

edit : my last post here will be "BB Donald" one fine day...


Only 7.5 more years to go!
GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info