Donald Trump and US politics

"

kolyaboo wrote:

"

Do you deny that both Trump and Kushner have had past business dealings with Russian money sources?

When did that become a crime? Answer: never. I know lots of people and companies that have dealings with Russian companies (me too) so fucking what?

"

Do you think that Michael Flynn was an appropriate hire for the cabinet?

Not really, but Obama thought he was a great guy and I don't like a few of Trump's picks but again, this is no crime.

Business dealings are not a crime, but if those past connections are driving his current policies and actions, we should know what they are. Should Jared Kushner be using his WH position to create additional personal wealth?

Obama fired Flynn. He later became a foreign agent with close ties to Putin; Trump than gave him access to the highest level of government secrets. You don't think that is worth investigating?

"

ChanBalam wrote:

It is not about proving a negative at all.

Can Hillary prove that she didn't order the assasination of Seth Rich? (do you see how stupid this is?)

"

So do you believe that the Russian government tried to interfere with the 2016 election?

No, because I do not believe the corrupt lying media and their DNC handlers. This distrust goes way before the 2016 elections and Trump.

"

Do you deny that both Trump and Kushner have had past business dealings with Russian money sources?

Are past business dealings a crime? This proves nothing. Hillary had past business dealings with many shady figures (eg. Saudi) Is stuff in Russia the only or the most lucrative deal that Trump has? Why it is singled out, vs all the other dealings?

"

Do you deny that Trump supporters have tried to slow or derail the investigation into Russian interference into the election or the Michael Flynn investigation?

How can Trump supporters derail or slow an investigation?! Meme magic?

I'll be back later.

"

ChanBalam wrote:

I'll be back later.

Please don't. You have nothing to offer other than biased bullshit.

"

ChanBalam wrote:

I'll be back later.

Okie doke

you guys made me hard

"

Arctic Climate Change Study Canceled Because of Climate Change

https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/arctic-climate-change-study-canceled-because-of-climate-change

...Again. =^[.]^=

"

Raycheetah wrote:

"

Arctic Climate Change Study Canceled Because of Climate Change

https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/arctic-climate-change-study-canceled-because-of-climate-change

...Again. =^[.]^=

Did you even read the article?

"

faerwin wrote:

"

Raycheetah wrote:

"

Arctic Climate Change Study Canceled Because of Climate Change

https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/arctic-climate-change-study-canceled-because-of-climate-change

...Again. =^[.]^=

Did you even read the article?

Did you actually believe it?

"

morbo wrote:

Can Hillary prove that she didn't order the assasination of Seth Rich? (do you see how stupid this is?)

No, because I do not believe the corrupt lying media and their DNC handlers. This distrust goes way before the 2016 elections and Trump.

Are past business dealings a crime? This proves nothing. Hillary had past business dealings with many shady figures (eg. Saudi) Is stuff in Russia the only or the most lucrative deal that Trump has? Why it is singled out, vs all the other dealings?

"

Do you deny that Trump supporters have tried to slow or derail the investigation into Russian interference into the election or the Michael Flynn investigation?

How can Trump supporters derail or slow an investigation?! Meme magic?

Of course Hillary cannot, but an investigation could. She could only provide information related to the inquiry. Donald doesn't have to prove anything either, he just has to provide information. You seem quite obsessed with Hillary btw. What's with that? She was a terrible candidate and lost. You should put that behind you.

It appears that you have long standing issues with the "corrupt lying media". I assume you mean everyone except Fox and Brietbart, but I would like to know what news sources you do trust, or if there are none, then how do you know anything at all?

In my earlier rush to post before I left for a meeting, I said "Trump supporters". I actually meant WH, and congressional supporters and not the general public supporters. My post was unclear.

Hillary's past business dealings are no longer an issue. She lost. Because Trump won, his are important because they might well be influencing his decisions as president. We need to know what they are. If you think Hillary's business dealings should be open for discussion, why do you object to Trump's being discussed? The reason Russia features so prominently in the current situation is because there are so many loose threads dealing with Russia, the Trump campaign, Trump's campaign staff, Jared's dealings with Russia and even Trump's past dealings with Russians. These all look suspicious given Trump's public statements regarding both Putin and Russia.

Trump and Kushner can both prove they have no financial ties to Russia by opening their company books for inspection. Boom, speculation ended in an instant.

Do you actually think that Jared Kushner forgot that he had a meeting with the head of the Russian bank?