How I Got to Level 100
" viabilty is not the same as efficiency edit: there are many 'viable' builds in PoE but most of them wont be as efficient as a dual totem spork build. <--- see the difference? edit: @BoondockSaint: happy your pimp came to your rescue? too bad his post didn't refute mine. “Demons run when a good man goes to war" Last edited by Sneakypaw#3052 on May 22, 2013, 12:37:15 PM
|
|
|
Sneaky has a point.
|
|
" keep stroking, i am almost there....*joke* edit: sorry, i had to do that. For some reason I get a bit embarased when people agree with me so openly. That was my way to cope with it^^' “Demons run when a good man goes to war" Last edited by Sneakypaw#3052 on May 22, 2013, 12:51:21 PM
|
|
" Well, it really is, in context (presuming you mean viability rather than viabilty). You can be viable or not. You can be more viable or less viable. As the quote from Chris says equally viable, we know where we are. Exactly how can solo be equally viable but less efficient, when efficiency will denote the viability? Chris talks about progression, challenge and overcoming that challenge. In this thread, you yourself are talking about progression. How does viability =/= efficiency, in this context? " And thus not as viable. Viable but not equally viable. Efficient but not equally efficient. Casually casual. Last edited by TheAnuhart#4741 on May 22, 2013, 12:59:43 PM
|
|
|
you guys just can't keep it civil can you all.
shame on all of you. |
|
" If you want to go that way we both will walk against a wall. We don't know what exactly is viable in Chris's eyes. He could mean you can reach level 100 by playing solo and you can reach it by playing with a group thus making them equally viable if that criteria is met. Or he could mean they can reach just as fast or whatever. Since we don't know, it's all semantics. “Demons run when a good man goes to war"
|
|
|
Lawl, that's funny man, you got the fanbois believing that shit...
"oh ya we got unlucky after running 150+ 73-75 maps" LOL I am not hating on you man, takes a lot of dedication to do what you did, but to say was 100% legit, I don't think so. If you want that to be believable, tell your friends who buy maps/currency from d2jsp to be careful who they disclose that information to :P Its pretty obvious as you rarely open maps to... Granted their business doesn't affect you and I wouldn't expect you to say no to mappin with your group because of purchased maps, but this post shoulda remained non existent. Last edited by AthenaUS#7001 on May 22, 2013, 1:23:00 PM
|
|
" Blah blah blah Anarchy/Onslaught T-Shirt Owner.
Trading Guide : http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/519890 Killing Vaal merc with (600 life) : http://is.gd/qsgV9P [Open Beta] Let's be Crazy: http://is.gd/TxxLsS / Old Suggestion: http://is.gd/Jd09W0 << God blesses those who bless themselves >> |
|
" Fine, OK, let's just call it semantics.
Spoiler
I must point out, however, that you claimed to know exactly what BoondockSaint meant and indeed GGG's goal in order to correct them in your reply. Semantics, I suppose.
Casually casual.
|
|
" GGG clearly said Maps are not meant for high level xp gain but to be a option to get better gear. There is nothing to understand wrong there. Regarding BoodockSaint's post. You are right, I did some interpretation there. But since he didn't say that what I pointed to was not what he meant I would guess that I was right what he was on about. (mostly because everyone complaining about maps does so in regards to leveling) But like I said. We can both interpret what Chris means by 'viable', but as long as we don't know for sure...right? “Demons run when a good man goes to war" Last edited by Sneakypaw#3052 on May 22, 2013, 1:30:44 PM
|
|
