ALL HAIL PRESIDENT TRUMP

"

Altnaharra wrote:

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

"

Altnaharra wrote:

Probably an old topic, this'll be my only post here.



Are those food or shit buckets? You decide.

https://grassrootsdempolitics.com/index.php/
2018/06/18/trump-administration-locking-
migrant-children-in-cages/

That's a picture of Palestinian children locked up by Israel. Try a Google reverse image search next time before gullibly posting fake news.

What did I just fucking tell you?

Edit:

"

Altnaharra wrote:

Whatever picture was used doesn't change the story.
There, that photo above was edited, does it change anything?
The news is real.
The point is valid.

Bullshit. The picture used DOES change the story. Marketing professionals know that some of the best persuasion is visual. The types of images you associate with the truth DOES bias you, and this is evidence you're biased by lies. And what's worse, you KNOW they're lies and still approve.

For what it's worth, I've never bought into the Trump-supporter belief that the left can't meme. This is pretty clear evidence that they can. What so many fail to grasp is that the left isn't trying to meme for laughs — the most woke among them have become too humorless for that. No, the left memes for outrage. That's the psychic energy that feeds them and that they organically spread to each other.

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

What did I just fucking tell you?

That you care more about the origin of images used in news articles than the articles themselves?

"

The_Reporter wrote:

"

Raycheetah wrote:

"

The_Reporter wrote:

Will you accept the content of the report?

That's a STUPID question.

No reasonable person would state blindly that they would accept the content of any report (let alone a report based on such naked political bias) without seeing what is in it. Well, Nancy Pelosi might... =9[.]9=

So the answer is no. That's exactly how a criminal/guilty person would react.

Guess it wasn't a stupid question after all, hmm?

=^[.]~=

So if the Mueller report says that there is zero actionable evidence of Trump colluding with Russia, and no further evidence of Russian interference in our election process other than those Facebook ads, and zero evidence that WikiLeaks and Russia colluded, would you accept that as true?

"

The_Reporter wrote:

Things just got worse than ever for Trump: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article226577419.html

How does that even link to Trump?

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

So if the Mueller report says that there is zero actionable evidence of Trump colluding with Russia, and no further evidence of Russian interference in our election process other than those Facebook ads, and zero evidence that WikiLeaks and Russia colluded, would you accept that as true?

no.

Why? Because as you said, it's actionable evidence.

I would reluctantly accept that it's unlikely that there'd be enough ground for him to get charged. But, unlike with a guilty case, a lack of proof doesn't imply a lack of crime. There's way too much dirt around him for Trump to be innocent. At the very least, he knew and did nothing to prevent it.

There's already plenty of evidence that Russia colluded.

"

faerwin wrote:

"

The_Reporter wrote:

Things just got worse than ever for Trump: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article226577419.html

How does that even link to Trump?

The rapist/pedophile that got the really good deal is/was a good friend that Trump used to "party" with. And the prosecutor that broke the law to let me off the hook the way he did is an old friend of Trump's that is currently in Trump's cabinet, IIRC. I don't think that there is any legal sensitive problems for Trump because of this though, just another swampy mess for the Trump administration.

"

The_Reporter wrote:

I figured you wouldn't answer.

I did answer, my answer just went over your head.

"

Turtledove wrote:

Hint: you are telling more lies about there being a federal law against lynching. Very silly of you to keep making so many false statements.

So the dudes who killed that guy got death sentences or life in prison. Almost like lynching is somehow illegal.

"

Turtledove wrote:

The rapist/pedophile that got the really good deal is/was a good friend that Trump used to "party" with. And the prosecutor that broke the law to let me off the hook the way he did is an old friend of Trump's that is currently in Trump's cabinet, IIRC. I don't think that there is any legal sensitive problems for Trump because of this though, just another swampy mess for the Trump administration.

That's Slick Willy, not Trump.