ALL HAIL PRESIDENT TRUMP

"
morbo wrote:
"
The_Reporter wrote:
Because clearly, all Muslim people are terrorists. Trump should work on his domestic white male American terrorist problem first.

If you have a method to surely weed out those immigrants who plan to commit terrorism and those who don't, you could become a very rich man. Meanwhile better safe than sorry. Since islamic terrorism is closely tied to the ideology and culture of islam, that list of banned countries should be greatly expanded.

And even if we disregard the terrorist threat, US/EU is a not an "all you can eat buffet" for the whole planet.


A Muslim person is no more likely to become a terrorist than a non-Muslim person. Being a terrorist isn't exclusive to Muslims.

Even if there were not a single Muslim person in the USA, there would be as many acts of terror as there is now.
"
The_Reporter wrote:
Innervation, if it's not a covert operation it's a different story. The Trump campaign were discussing policy (and other illegal things) with the Russians on the sly. The Russians and/or Trump needed to check with the Obama administration and make known the content of discussion. They did not, because the USA would have NEVER approved of this kind of discussion with a hostile foreign power (Russia)

Read the thread I linked. It shows all of the factors needed to violate the Logan Act.


Hostile foreign power? The cold war has been over for a long time. Please refrain from using mind altering drugs further please, for your own good.

"
The_Reporter wrote:


A Muslim person is no more likely to become a terrorist than a non-Muslim person. Being a terrorist isn't exclusive to Muslims.

Even if there were not a single Muslim person in the USA, there would be as many acts of terror as there is now.


Clearly we were not at war in Afghanistan and Iraq and fighting insurgents who were fighting for a 'jihad'. Clearly you have more knowledge on this subject than anyone who did serve during Operation Iraqi Freedom...oh wait, you don't. So keep speaking about things which you clearly have zero knowledge of, because it's pretty obvious you have never served in the U.S. military when you make oblivious statements such as this one.
Still in the alpha stage, but at least build diversity isn't an issue: https://wolcengame.com/home/
"
faerwin wrote:


did you even read what you linked?

He refused to do meet with other nations leaders BECAUSE he didn't want to undermine the presidency of Bush since he was still the president.


You couldn't even read the California penal code that I linked and still continued to ramble on about 'intent', when the code clearly stated 'in an unlawful manner' and 'without malice', yet you're holding others to a different standard? I'd tell you I'm surprised, but it's hard to be surprised by someone who supports criminals who kill others by acting recklessly with a firearm.
Still in the alpha stage, but at least build diversity isn't an issue: https://wolcengame.com/home/
"
JNF wrote:


Clearly we were not at war in Afghanistan and Iraq and fighting insurgents who were fighting for a 'jihad'. Clearly you have more knowledge on this subject than anyone who did serve during Operation Iraqi Freedom...oh wait, you don't. So keep speaking about things which you clearly have zero knowledge of, because it's pretty obvious you have never served in the U.S. military when you make oblivious statements such as this one.


I'm talking about IN the USA. With no Muslim people in the USA, there would STILL be as much terrorism in the USA.

Russia IS a hostile foreign power and an enemy. They practice different forms of warfare now, but they are the enemy of the US and many other nations of the world.

Hostile doesn't mean at war.

North Korea is obviously not at war with the US but it's definitively hostile.
Russia is most definitively an hostile nation to the US.
Build of the week #9 - Breaking your face with style http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_EcQDOUN9Y
IGN: Poltun
"
The_Reporter wrote:
A Muslim person is no more likely to become a terrorist than a non-Muslim person. Being a terrorist isn't exclusive to Muslims.

Even if there were not a single Muslim person in the USA, there would be as many acts of terror as there is now.
Some facts:
* From 1974 to 2016, over 80% of suicide attacks have occurred in just five nations: Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria and Nigeria. All of these countries have been subject to an armed insurgency attempting to establish Islamist theocracy.
* From 1974 to 2016, over 50% of suicide attacks have been traced back to, or claimed by, Islamic terrorist organizations. 46% of such suicide attacks are not traced back to or claimed by any group whatsoever.
* From 2009 to 2016, in cases where the religious preference of a suicide attacker is known, that religion is Islamic over 97% of the time. (Secular came in at about 0.7%.)
* From 2009 to 2016, in cases where the religious preference of a suicide attack victim is known, that religion is Islamic over 96% of the time.

A Muslim person is more likely than a non-Muslim to become a terrorist. That why so many people in predominantly Muslim nations are victims of terrorism.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
Any killing with intent is terrorism.
"
The_Reporter wrote:
Innervation, if it's not a covert operation it's a different story. The Trump campaign were discussing policy (and other illegal things) with the Russians on the sly. The Russians and/or Trump needed to check with the Obama administration and make known the content of discussion. They did not, because the USA would have NEVER approved of this kind of discussion with a hostile foreign power (Russia)


https://youtu.be/2vO3GNexHYI?t=1705

:D

That's totally not a video of Obama's state department saying that they have no problem with the Trump camp talking with foreigners.

:D
Last edited by innervation#4093 on Dec 5, 2017, 11:34:23 PM
"
JNF wrote:
"
faerwin wrote:


did you even read what you linked?

He refused to do meet with other nations leaders BECAUSE he didn't want to undermine the presidency of Bush since he was still the president.


You couldn't even read the California penal code that I linked and still continued to ramble on about 'intent', when the code clearly stated 'in an unlawful manner' and 'without malice', yet you're holding others to a different standard? I'd tell you I'm surprised, but it's hard to be surprised by someone who supports criminals who kill others by acting recklessly with a firearm.


Evidence suggest accidental discharge of firearm. You don't really have a case. Don't believe that Garcia Zarate, he is mind fucking you. He didn't shoot at the sea lions.
Last edited by deathflower#0444 on Dec 6, 2017, 12:28:41 AM
"
innervation wrote:
"
The_Reporter wrote:
Innervation, if it's not a covert operation it's a different story. The Trump campaign were discussing policy (and other illegal things) with the Russians on the sly. The Russians and/or Trump needed to check with the Obama administration and make known the content of discussion. They did not, because the USA would have NEVER approved of this kind of discussion with a hostile foreign power (Russia)


https://youtu.be/2vO3GNexHYI?t=1705

:D

That's totally not a video of Obama's state department saying that they have no problem with the Trump camp talking with foreigners.

:D


Obama's administration is not Obama. Obama's administration might have known Trump camp talking with foreigners but not Obama. The Obama Administration can have conflicting and confusing messages with Obama which is more apparent with Trump Administration. More importantly did the Obama Administration act independently or with the approval of the former president. There is the question of whether Obama know about the content of the discussion.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info