[Sao Paulo Gateway] Connection issues - Antel
yesterday sent a complaint to Antel telling them our problem today 11:44 (Uruguay time) there are no problems with the game in the maps, but in my HO if I have ping peaks
ED: NVM! PING IS BACK ;_; ED2: the lag is only in some maps the cities and HO, Oasis worked well 50-60 ping but acid lakes happens the same as with cities and HO 300+ ms _: br.login.pathofexile.com |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | WinMTR statistics | | Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last | |------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------| | 192.168.1.1 - 0 | 86 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | | cor4bras1.antel.net.uy - 0 | 86 | 86 | 1 | 5 | 26 | 1 | | ibb2cor4-0-2-0-1.antel.net.uy - 0 | 86 | 86 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 2 | | 192.168.192.81 - 0 | 86 | 86 | 28 | 32 | 36 | 36 | | 192.168.197.81 - 0 | 86 | 86 | 15 | 17 | 24 | 18 | | 192.168.197.82 - 0 | 86 | 86 | 12 | 13 | 18 | 13 | | as6057.saopaulo.sp.ix.br - 0 | 86 | 86 | 18 | 20 | 24 | 19 | | as36351.saopaulo.sp.ix.br - 0 | 86 | 86 | 48 | 50 | 55 | 50 | | ae5.dar01.sao01.networklayer.com - 0 | 86 | 86 | 43 | 45 | 58 | 44 | | po1.fcr01a.sao01.networklayer.com - 0 | 86 | 86 | 41 | 43 | 47 | 41 | | 36.84.39a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com - 0 | 86 | 86 | 41 | 43 | 46 | 43 | |________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______| WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider speedtest.sao01.softlayer.com |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | WinMTR statistics | | Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last | |------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------| | 192.168.1.1 - 0 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | | cor4bras1.antel.net.uy - 0 | 15 | 15 | 4 | 7 | 17 | 15 | | ibb2cor4-0-2-0-1.antel.net.uy - 0 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 2 | | 192.168.192.81 - 0 | 15 | 15 | 29 | 31 | 36 | 31 | | 192.168.197.69 - 0 | 15 | 15 | 29 | 31 | 36 | 30 | | 192.168.197.70 - 0 | 15 | 15 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 32 | | ibr2bar2-0-0-1-1.700.antel.net.uy - 0 | 15 | 15 | 21 | 23 | 26 | 21 | | as36351.saopaulo.sp.ix.br - 0 | 15 | 15 | 52 | 53 | 57 | 54 | | ae5.dar02.sao01.networklayer.com - 29 | 7 | 5 | 85 | 85 | 86 | 86 | | po2.fcr01b.sao01.networklayer.com - 67 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 88 | 88 | 88 | | speedtest.sao01.softlayer.com - 10 | 10 | 9 | 85 | 86 | 88 | 85 | |________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______| WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider Last edited by NoLimitFound#5627 on Sep 8, 2017, 12:05:12 PM
|
|
Yesterday's pingplotter http://imgur.com/a/kB9bo
Today's pingplotter http://imgur.com/a/fCNZ6 20% packet loss on po1.fcr01b.sao01.networklayer.com besides that, everything seems to be back to normal Edit: not fixed yet, yesterday it was like 80% of the instances you create will be laggy af. Now it's like 50%, so, still, you can't do lab, because every time you create an instance of a room you have high chances of creating a 100/1k ms instance, you can't play maps because of the same reason, anything you can´t recreate an instance of is pretty much screwed. Any update on the situation would be appreciated Last edited by Aldaris34#2393 on Sep 8, 2017, 1:38:36 PM
|
|
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics | | Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last | |------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------| | 192.168.1.1 - 0 | 72 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | | cor4bras1.antel.net.uy - 0 | 72 | 72 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3 | | ibb2cor3-Hu0-2-0-1.antel.net.uy - 0 | 72 | 72 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 3 | | 192.168.192.69 - 0 | 72 | 72 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 17 | | 192.168.197.69 - 0 | 72 | 72 | 14 | 17 | 20 | 20 | | 192.168.197.70 - 0 | 72 | 72 | 14 | 14 | 17 | 14 | | ibr2bar2-0-0-1-1.700.antel.net.uy - 0 | 72 | 72 | 15 | 16 | 18 | 17 | | as36351.saopaulo.sp.ix.br - 8 | 57 | 53 | 81 | 83 | 89 | 82 | | ae5.dar02.sao01.networklayer.com - 0 | 72 | 72 | 46 | 46 | 49 | 46 | | po2.fcr01b.sao01.networklayer.com - 0 | 72 | 72 | 44 | 45 | 49 | 46 | | 36.84.39a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com - 16 | 45 | 38 | 0 | 91 | 92 | 89 | |________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______| WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider |
|
Someone has to do something here, I really REALLY think it's from the server side not from our ISP, it's been 3 days with unplayable ping, FIX PLEASE.
Edit: Tested Overwatch that has servers on Brazil and it plays smooth and with low ping. It's your provider GGG, insist with them to fix it please. Last edited by Exelion39#6664 on Sep 8, 2017, 8:04:20 PM
|
|
The game is unplayable at this moment and I do not see interest from the staff for fixing this.
|
|
maybe a error intoduced in last patch?? cause its unplayable since then
|
|
" It's not like it was perfect before the patch, you still had a chance of creating laggy instances, and you played with your ping zig-zaging all over the chart, plus the normal 50ms at the start of 3.0 changed into the normal 60/70/80ms, stressful, but bearable. Now, this last days were just... and the lack of acknowledgment by GGG really shocks me. |
|
Confirmed, still unplayable. And it´s definetively not an ISP or local issue, no packet loss or connection issue to blizzard games or other providers.
|
|
yesterday battlefield 1 and counter strike global ofensive they worked poorly too (they have servers in Brazil) since I made the complaint to Antel they stopped working badly but POE gives lag peaks in maps and not all the time like yesterday I sincerely believe that it is no longer a problem of our internet service br.login.pathofexile.com |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | WinMTR statistics | | Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last | |------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------| | 192.168.1.1 - 0 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | | cor4bras1.antel.net.uy - 0 | 28 | 28 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 7 | | ibb2cor4-0-2-0-1.antel.net.uy - 0 | 28 | 28 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 3 | | 192.168.192.81 - 0 | 28 | 28 | 30 | 32 | 35 | 31 | | 192.168.197.81 - 0 | 28 | 28 | 16 | 18 | 21 | 19 | | 192.168.197.82 - 0 | 28 | 28 | 13 | 14 | 17 | 15 | | as6057.saopaulo.sp.ix.br - 0 | 28 | 28 | 20 | 21 | 24 | 22 | | as36351.saopaulo.sp.ix.br - 0 | 28 | 28 | 47 | 49 | 55 | 49 | | ae5.dar01.sao01.networklayer.com - 0 | 28 | 28 | 44 | 46 | 49 | 47 | | po1.fcr01a.sao01.networklayer.com - 0 | 28 | 28 | 42 | 43 | 47 | 43 | | 36.84.39a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com - 0 | 28 | 28 | 42 | 42 | 45 | 42 | |________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______| WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider speedtest.sao01.softlayer.com |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | WinMTR statistics | | Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last | |------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------| | 192.168.1.1 - 0 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | | cor4bras1.antel.net.uy - 0 | 29 | 29 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 2 | | ibb2cor4-0-2-0-1.antel.net.uy - 0 | 29 | 29 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 3 | | 192.168.192.81 - 0 | 29 | 29 | 30 | 33 | 36 | 32 | | 192.168.197.69 - 0 | 29 | 29 | 31 | 33 | 36 | 31 | | 192.168.197.70 - 0 | 29 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 33 | 30 | | ibr2bar2-0-0-1-1.700.antel.net.uy - 0 | 29 | 29 | 21 | 23 | 26 | 22 | | as36351.saopaulo.sp.ix.br - 0 | 29 | 29 | 51 | 52 | 55 | 51 | | ae5.dar02.sao01.networklayer.com - 10 | 22 | 20 | 84 | 85 | 87 | 85 | | po2.fcr01b.sao01.networklayer.com - 22 | 14 | 11 | 86 | 87 | 89 | 87 | | speedtest.sao01.softlayer.com - 12 | 17 | 15 | 84 | 85 | 88 | 85 | |________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______| WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider |
|
" Heh, that's an amusing typo; I assume you meant to type "raising". But if you want people to raid their office, that's fine too I guess. :P “Please understand that imposing strong negative views regarding our team on to other players when you are representing our most helpful forum posters is not appropriate.” — GGG 2022
---- I'm not 'Sarno' on Discord. I don't know who that is. |
|