Patch Notes 3.1.0
Sometimes, but just sometimes, reading more than the first post is actually worth it. Though then again, it'd be less entertaining for the others.
|
|
" Can't believe some people get baited like this. Unless I just got baited. |
|
y wos w8ting this patch and wanted to buy stash tabs etc ...god for me that im patiemnt and y see ur changes ..il not bui a fkin thing. il just delet all cars and houp u remain widowt players no more. "HAPPY NEW YEAR" u alreadye lost a player and a potential buyer ..howp u looze all in this way .... il just get other game ;)
PS: plz delet al caracters too ;) GOOD JOBE ...the other kinde of JOBE. |
|
GGG was brilliant in releasing the nerfed state of VP during the 3.1 press release.
The community will have already lost the fire to resist when 3.1 patch notes do finally hit. IGN: Arlianth
Check out my LA build: 1782214 |
|
Why is chill removed but burn isnt? Fire damage as it is deals way more damage than cold, just look at the gems.
|
|
" A Non-Meta players are the people who creates the meta in the first place. Or there wouldn't be new meta's each season. Unless you think everyone just gets to the same idea on there own. Further more non-meta players generally speaking like change means they have new toys to play with to make new builds with. It's the joy of discovery not the speed at which you clear ect. Last edited by Kappa_Murkey#4874 on Dec 5, 2017, 12:43:38 AM
|
|
Spoiler
Hahahahaha
I'm reading general discussion and it's a whinefest. Keep it going boys, argue all you want, tasty nerfs are here. Can't wait for patch notes now. Spreading salt since 2006
|
|
It will always be a fight between someone who enjoys a sometimes OP build and people who want nerfs for very basic reasons.
Be it just laughing at them whenever it gets nerfed or not being able to play it for whatever reason. Will just have to wait until patch notes to see if they bring life back to some not so good builds and skills. Don't mind nerfs when it is explained that its just from a GGG reasoning, but when they use that word "player feedback" I do get worried. The reason again as I said most people want nerfs for very very basic reasons. |
|
To everyone in GD.
My stance comes from the fact that most of people, regardless of stance/side (pro or versus nerf) lack empathy to put themselves in developer position. Each time you see nerf/buff/change, put yourself in that developers place, and ask yourself, would you do that to your game, counting on future and prosperity of game, or would you do otherwise? Once you do, you will see that doing anything is not as easy as being greeted by 3.1.0 patch notes in the morning and then proceed to argue. Spreading salt since 2006
|
|
" I've heard this argument before, in fact, every major patch level I think it gets bandied about some. He's referring to how power shifts always have secondary effects. Like, watch good helm enchants be unobtainable or cost twice as much now. Twice! Because now your five minute lab build is going to take six, so a portion of them will go do something else. Unbelievable. Thing is, it comes with an assumption that everyone anti-meta also completely lacks foresight. --
I don't have alpha access, that was a LONG time ago. |
|