"
Shovelcut wrote:
"
Turtledove wrote:
Sorry Shovelcut, you really are not making any sense.
It makes perfect sense if you have the capacity to understand what you read. Which at this point I'm very doubtful of...
I've simply pointed out that one of the recent additions to your list of threads that "discuss the laby" shouldn't be on your list. The reason for this claim is because the thread doesn't have anything to do with the laby, which I then supplied multiple links to back up that claim. All of which are threads made by the same poster demonstrating that his issues are of the technical variety (on his end because he's on a questionable connection and using an OS that isn't officially supported by the game).
A thread being included in the list is based on the reading of the OP of that thread. That is as specified in the OP of my thread where the list is kept. I indeed thought your provided links were further threads that were listed in the list. It turns out though that those threads are even less relevant to the question of whether the thread is to be in the list or not.
"
Shovelcut wrote:
Does that not make sense? Is it really that hard to understand?
Your post was hard to understand and so I really didn't spend much time trying to decipher it to try to figure out where the misunderstandings were.
"
Shovelcut wrote:
"
Turtledove wrote:
I have not made any false claims.
Yeah, you claimed you "obviously already looked at them" referring to the threads discussing Chadwixx technical issues. But you obviously didn't because your response demonstrates you were assuming that they were other threads that were included on your list. They were NOT.
"
Turtledove wrote:
You admit that you believe that list is meaningless, yet you have done all these posts to try to change a meaningless list?
The list is now worthless/meaningless because of the addition of threads like the one in question. At this point you're just using any threads with "lab" in them to pad your list...
Remember when I was helping you with the "donated analysis"? Yeah, that stopped because you've ruined any credibility the list had (IMO) because of your blatant number padding with all the spam threads. I've put too much time going through all those threads and accounts to just ignore how dishonest your list has become. Excuse me for feeling strongly about something I've put so many hours into.
Anyone with common sense dedicated enough to go through the list would find that a vast majority of the threads are useless feedback very much like the very thread we're in now.
Want to be honest? Then you should change the name of your thread to something like "Over 310 threads that have lab in the title with over 750 accounts that likely don't know I'm listing them in support of my agenda".
"
Turtledove wrote:
Sounds familar, like the time you made up the BS in your mind that I had claimed everyone in the account name list had been proven to not be an alt-account and twelve pages later you were still deluded about it.
Yeah, that only went on as long as it did because just as you've done in this thread when facts are presented to you you twist things around and resort to simply repeating yourself ad nauseam.
"
Shovelcut wrote:
"
lagwin1980 wrote:
"680" posters...have you went and verified it's 680 individual people and not the same handful regurgitating the same QQ in other threads.
"
Turtledove wrote:
Yes I have. -snip- This was done in response to paranoid people that said I or someone else was creating alt accounts just to up the numbers on the list. This irrational argument has been soundly laid to rest because there are fewer than 4% of the accounts with an *. ( meaning alt)
"
Turtledove wrote:
I've added your name to the list. I know you are using an alt account.
"
FixLabPLSGGG wrote:
Yeah...
Oh and for the record, nobody was claiming you or anyone else was creating alts to up the numbers on the list. The claim was that you're knowingly adding alts to the list and that you couldn't know if older accounts are alts or not by just looking at their account profile. That's you projecting your issues again and doing some kind of batshit crazy mental gymnastics.
Consider this the last reply I'll give you. I'm not going to waste one more second responding to some dimwitted moronic post that includes some thinly veiled personal attacks.
Shovelcut, you were being deceitful in your cutting and pasting of my response to lagwin1980. I called you out on it at the time and you copied in here the exact same deceitful edit. You are also stating a flat out falsehood when you state, "Oh and for the record, nobody was claiming you or anyone else was creating alts to up the numbers on the list". This is proven by the quote above in lagwin's statement. That was exactly what lagwin was implying. Others have made similar assertions. Plus I remember during that discussion you stated/implied that it was probably I that was doing it rather than someone else.
Regarding the list not agreeing with whatever criteria that is in your head, the list is exactly what is stated in the OP where the list is kept. Contrary your silly assertion, this is not in order to pad the list but to make the maintenance of the list more manageable. For example, it is not a list of outstanding "valid" issues with the labyrinth that have not yet been solved but everyone agrees needs to be solved. Such a list would be worthless because it would be empty but would still have taken me ten times the effort to maintain than the current list. The list is simply a historical record of the threads that satisfy the criteria mentioned in the OP of the thread where the list is kept. If you'd like to change the criteria then you can start up your own list with whatever criteria you want.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
|
Posted byTurtledove#4014on Apr 13, 2017, 7:28:12 PM
|
|
You two have taken over this entire thread with your mostly irrelevant personal inter-thread feud, did you notice?
Not that it was a particularly high-quality thread to begin with, but you might want to take it to pm in the future.
Wash your hands, Exile! Last edited by gibbousmoon#4656 on Apr 13, 2017, 9:15:20 PM
|
Posted bygibbousmoon#4656on Apr 13, 2017, 9:12:40 PM
|
"
gibbousmoon wrote:
You two have taken over this entire thread with your mostly irrelevant personal inter-thread feud, did you notice?
Not that it was a particularly high-quality thread to begin with, but you might want to take it to pm in the future.
As usual, Gibbousmoon is absolutely correct. My apologies to Gibbousmoon and restinpieces.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired! Last edited by Turtledove#4014 on Apr 13, 2017, 9:19:36 PM
|
Posted byTurtledove#4014on Apr 13, 2017, 9:18:48 PM
|
"
gibbousmoon wrote:
You two have taken over this entire thread with your mostly irrelevant personal inter-thread feud, did you notice?
Not that it was a particularly high-quality thread to begin with, but you might want to take it to pm in the future.
No different than any other Lab thread.
U MAD?
|
Posted byDocbp87#4179on Apr 14, 2017, 1:06:07 AM
|
"
restinpieces0815 wrote:
I enter Bizzaros room get one shot by some stupid invisible shit from the ground.
Can you explain this in more detail? I dont remember reading about such a thing before.
And how do you know its "from the ground" if its invisible? Or do you mean "invisible" == "has no tell" == "invisible before it hits"?
No wonder it's lost, it's in the middle of the jungle!
|
Posted byZrevnur#2026on Apr 14, 2017, 1:42:36 AM
|
"
Zrevnur wrote:
"
restinpieces0815 wrote:
I enter Bizzaros room get one shot by some stupid invisible shit from the ground.
Can you explain this in more detail? I dont remember reading about such a thing before.
And how do you know its "from the ground" if its invisible? Or do you mean "invisible" == "has no tell" == "invisible before it hits"?
Dont bother, when asked to provide video proof they have none, despite shadow play and windows recording being a thing.
You will notice almost all lab haters, especially ones that make titles like OP does that they are just frustrated that they died.
https://youtu.be/T9kygXtkh10?t=285
FeelsBadMan
Remove MF from POE, make juiced map the new MF.
|
Posted bygoetzjam#3084on Apr 14, 2017, 9:54:05 AM
|
"
goetzjam wrote:
Dont bother, when asked to provide video proof they have none, despite shadow play and windows recording being a thing.
You will notice almost all lab haters, especially ones that make titles like OP does that they are just frustrated that they died.
Their posts speak for themselves. You're incorrect summation is not necessary, and oddly enough, it appears on every post concerning lab. I don't understand your love affair with the lab, but you are entitled to it.
Now why don't you provide the same consideration and recognize that others are entitled to their disdain for it.
|
Posted byewolow#7384on Apr 14, 2017, 10:20:16 AM
|
"
ewolow wrote:
"
goetzjam wrote:
Dont bother, when asked to provide video proof they have none, despite shadow play and windows recording being a thing.
You will notice almost all lab haters, especially ones that make titles like OP does that they are just frustrated that they died.
Their posts speak for themselves. You're incorrect summation is not necessary, and oddly enough, it appears on every post concerning lab. I don't understand your love affair with the lab, but you are entitled to it.
Now why don't you provide the same consideration and recognize that others are entitled to their disdain for it.
Because when they are confronted with providing any proof or support to their claims they don't have it. Can't you see how that is an issue and how they could easily just be making shit up in order to try and get GGG to change or dumb down the game. I've seen it time and time again on various things in this game and the lab is one of the only pieces of content in the game fully balanced for a 1 try run (as in no portals)
https://youtu.be/T9kygXtkh10?t=285
FeelsBadMan
Remove MF from POE, make juiced map the new MF.
|
Posted bygoetzjam#3084on Apr 14, 2017, 10:49:19 AM
|
"
restinpieces0815 wrote:
I one shot all the mobs.
I run through all the Traps because the don't face me.
I can outrun every Bizzaros attack with a duration even when I am sleeping because I love to stack movement speed.
I enter Bizzaros room get one shot by some stupid invisible shit from the ground.
I can't trade, but I can disconnect and do everything again.
I usually get my ascendancy points when I luck out and don't get one shot for once. Which then turns a fucking insane fight into an easy thing.
If you like to do stupid experiments with your game, at least don't make them mandatory.
If you can't kill us because you can't balance your game killing players with one shots is not genius its lazy and stupid.
I believe this thread and the OP fall into the category " l2p issues "
Last edited by BestMageKR#3826 on Apr 14, 2017, 10:54:22 AM
|
Posted byBestMageKR#3826on Apr 14, 2017, 10:54:12 AM
|
"
Zrevnur wrote:
"
restinpieces0815 wrote:
I enter Bizzaros room get one shot by some stupid invisible shit from the ground.
Can you explain this in more detail? I dont remember reading about such a thing before.
And how do you know its "from the ground" if its invisible? Or do you mean "invisible" == "has no tell" == "invisible before it hits"?
I entered and stood halfway between him and the wall, as I always do. As soon as he moves I change position because he always jumps/fires at the very first second.
But this time I couldn't move and in the same split second I was already dead, even befor the green thinks hit me. I saw some animation on the ground so I assume that is what killed me.
"This is a Buff"
-------------------------------
There is an old almost forgotten prophecy, that hell will freeze over.
But we just recently discovered the true cause of this unlikely event:
By the time GGG manage to balance their game.
|
|
