Stupid fing lazy pice of shit design (of course lab)

"

restinpieces0815 wrote:

Keep up the good work Turtledove, just because all the people that hate the lab are gone or gone silent doesn't mean it is suddenly a good design.

I really don't like the lab. I am fortunate that I usually build high movement builds. What a lot of people didn't get, traps are a movement check. Go in with 30% movement speed and you gonna have a bad time! With enough movement speed you can just run through them.

Yes one shots are a general problem but the lab intensifies the pain to an extend that it makes many people rage quit or silently leave.

Thank you.

I note that I didn't add you to the list of account names. Over 310 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 750 posters in support That was because there was already someone on the list with the account name, "RestInPieces". If that account represents a different person then I could add restinpieces0815 to the list?

"

restinpieces0815 wrote:

Keep up the good work Turtledove, just because all the people that hate the lab are gone or gone silent doesn't mean it is suddenly a good design.

I really don't like the lab. I am fortunate that I usually build high movement builds. What a lot of people didn't get, traps are a movement check. Go in with 30% movement speed and you gonna have a bad time! With enough movement speed you can just run through them.

Yes one shots are a general problem but the lab intensifies the pain to an extend that it makes many people rage quit or silently leave.

The lab only 1 shots those that are too stupid to understand the challenge and traps are incapable of 1 shotting a player.

The people that can't do labyrinth traps shouldn't even go anywhere near any action games, because even the dumbed down to hell modern games are too much for them.

"

_Saranghaeyo_ wrote:

"

goetzjam wrote:

"

restinpieces0815 wrote:

Keep up the good work Turtledove, just because all the people that hate the lab are gone or gone silent doesn't mean it is suddenly a good design.

I really don't like the lab. I am fortunate that I usually build high movement builds. What a lot of people didn't get, traps are a movement check. Go in with 30% movement speed and you gonna have a bad time! With enough movement speed you can just run through them.

Yes one shots are a general problem but the lab intensifies the pain to an extend that it makes many people rage quit or silently leave.

The lab only 1 shots those that are too stupid to understand the challenge and traps are incapable of 1 shotting a player.

+

Agreed

"

Fruz wrote:

"

restinpieces0815 wrote:

I enter Bizzaros room get one shot by some stupid invisible shit from the ground.

Buy some glasses ?

Everybody laughed now gtfo. If you are not the most brainwashed white knight or even a paid GGG agent idk.

"

restinpieces0815 wrote:

"

Fruz wrote:

"

restinpieces0815 wrote:

I enter Bizzaros room get one shot by some stupid invisible shit from the ground.

Buy some glasses ?

Everybody laughed now gtfo. If you are not the most brainwashed white knight or even a paid GGG agent idk.

There seem to be so many things that you don't know.
Ok, another one : don't play the lab when you're drunk ?!
Or make sure to turn your computer screen on ?

PS : there is one very very obvious point that I was and am making, will you be able to get it ?

"

Fruz wrote:

There seem to be so many things that you don't know.
Ok, another one : don't play the lab when you're drunk ?!
Or make sure to turn your computer screen on ?

PS : there is one very very obvious point that I was and am making, will you be able to get it ?

Don't you tell me I can't kill me beer and drink Izaro at the same time.

lol!!

Never said you couldn't ;)

"

Turtledove wrote:

Sorry Shovelcut, you really are not making any sense.

It makes perfect sense if you have the capacity to understand what you read. Which at this point I'm very doubtful of...

I've simply pointed out that one of the recent additions to your list of threads that "discuss the laby" shouldn't be on your list. The reason for this claim is because the thread doesn't have anything to do with the laby, which I then supplied multiple links to back up that claim. All of which are threads made by the same poster demonstrating that his issues are of the technical variety (on his end because he's on a questionable connection and using an OS that isn't officially supported by the game).

Does that not make sense? Is it really that hard to understand?

"

Turtledove wrote:

I have not made any false claims.

Yeah, you claimed you "obviously already looked at them" referring to the threads discussing Chadwixx technical issues. But you obviously didn't because your response demonstrates you were assuming that they were other threads that were included on your list. They were NOT.

"

Turtledove wrote:

You admit that you believe that list is meaningless, yet you have done all these posts to try to change a meaningless list?

The list is now worthless/meaningless because of the addition of threads like the one in question. At this point you're just using any threads with "lab" in them to pad your list...

Remember when I was helping you with the "donated analysis"? Yeah, that stopped because you've ruined any credibility the list had (IMO) because of your blatant number padding with all the spam threads. I've put too much time going through all those threads and accounts to just ignore how dishonest your list has become. Excuse me for feeling strongly about something I've put so many hours into.

Anyone with common sense dedicated enough to go through the list would find that a vast majority of the threads are useless feedback very much like the very thread we're in now.
Want to be honest? Then you should change the name of your thread to something like "Over 310 threads that have lab in the title with over 750 accounts that likely don't know I'm listing them in support of my agenda".

"

Turtledove wrote:

Sounds familar, like the time you made up the BS in your mind that I had claimed everyone in the account name list had been proven to not be an alt-account and twelve pages later you were still deluded about it.

Yeah, that only went on as long as it did because just as you've done in this thread when facts are presented to you you twist things around and resort to simply repeating yourself ad nauseam.

"

Shovelcut wrote:

"

lagwin1980 wrote:

"680" posters...have you went and verified it's 680 individual people and not the same handful regurgitating the same QQ in other threads.

"

Turtledove wrote:

Yes I have. -snip- This was done in response to paranoid people that said I or someone else was creating alt accounts just to up the numbers on the list. This irrational argument has been soundly laid to rest because there are fewer than 4% of the accounts with an *. (meaning alt)

"

Turtledove wrote:

I've added your name to the list. I know you are using an alt account.

"

FixLabPLSGGG wrote:

my army of bump alts.

Yeah...

Oh and for the record, nobody was claiming you or anyone else was creating alts to up the numbers on the list. The claim was that you're knowingly adding alts to the list and that you couldn't know if older accounts are alts or not by just looking at their account profile. That's you projecting your issues again and doing some kind of batshit crazy mental gymnastics.

Consider this the last reply I'll give you. I'm not going to waste one more second responding to some dimwitted moronic post that includes some thinly veiled personal attacks.