The Labyrinth is great content

"

johnKeys wrote:

to clarify: this is not a "nerf Labyrinth" thread.

"

Tin_Foil_Hat wrote:

100 threads consisting of unconstructive feedback based entirely on personal opinions and not facts, to top that off its the generic few words, max one paragraph generic shit posts that are oh soo common with anyone who talks about labyrinth.

Literally nothing to see and not even remotely valid "evidence".

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

Tin_Foil_Hat wrote:

100 threads consisting of unconstructive feedback based entirely on personal opinions and not facts, to top that off its the generic few words, max one paragraph generic shit posts that are oh soo common with anyone who talks about labyrinth.

Literally nothing to see and not even remotely valid "evidence".

Of course this is all personal opinions. Being disgusted by trap gameplay being added to PoE is a personal opinion. Loving trap gameplay is also a personal opinion. Those personal opinions are in fact FACTS very important facts depending on what decisions or context for those decisions that GGG might be making.

Actually, the list is powerful anecdotal evidence of the level of disgust that people have of the trap gameplay being added to PoE, which is constructive in and of itself. Although that wasn't the purpose of my posting the list which I assume that I made clear to everyone except you.

"

Tin_Foil_Hat wrote:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_criticism

Clear to everyone which is why every time you post youre disagreed with which can be seen in nearly every labyrinth thread that you soo desperately post the same shitty copy pasta in ? Yeah, okay, totally not getting delusional at all there buddy.

PS - I suggest you read that wiki page and learn what actual constructive criticism is. If you understood that youd then understand why everyone laughs at labyrinth hate posts and says its whining.

"

P_Johann wrote:

"

Tin_Foil_Hat wrote:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_criticism

Clear to everyone which is why every time you post youre disagreed with which can be seen in nearly every labyrinth thread that you soo desperately post the same shitty copy pasta in ? Yeah, okay, totally not getting delusional at all there buddy.

PS - I suggest you read that wiki page and learn what actual constructive criticism is. If you understood that youd then understand why everyone laughs at labyrinth hate posts and says its whining.

>This article is written like a personal reflection or opinion essay

Constructive criticism actually in grey zone when it comes to feedback. Ofc you can call it a rant/whine when someone says his opinion and its different from yours. Not talking about obvious "GRRR!! HATE!! REMOVE THIS SHIT!!!!" posts, but there is plenty of valid opinions why people hate something and suggestions how to improve rather than remove. I can call that constructive criticism.

"

Casual_Ascent wrote:

"

Tin_Foil_Hat wrote:

"Constructive criticism is the process of offering valid and well-reasoned opinions about the work of others, usually involving both positive and negative comments, in a friendly manner rather than an oppositional one. The purpose of 'constructive criticism is to improve the outcome. In collaborative work, this kind of criticism is a valuable tool in raising and maintaining performance standards."


There is no "Greyzone". Thats like you saying that theres a grey zone in the scientific method. You either do it correctly or you dont.

Boy oh boy, do YOU ever need to read up on this subject more. Nobody needs to learn about this concept more than you.

"

Casual_Ascent wrote:

"

Tin_Foil_Hat wrote:

"Constructive criticism is the process of offering valid and well-reasoned opinions about the work of others, usually involving both positive and negative comments, in a friendly manner rather than an oppositional one. The purpose of 'constructive criticism is to improve the outcome. In collaborative work, this kind of criticism is a valuable tool in raising and maintaining performance standards."


There is no "Greyzone". Thats like you saying that theres a grey zone in the scientific method. You either do it correctly or you dont.

Boy oh boy, do YOU ever need to read up on this subject more. Nobody needs to learn about this concept more than you.