Two-Week Flashback Perandus Events - The Votes Are In!

I don't think the 2 weeks league is the problem (ssf or not) but the fact that rmt and d2jsp are not punished. For instance in this perandus hc league , i watched in darkee 's stream a guy spamming the d2jsp forum to buy stacks of 40 exalts with Forum Gold to acquire a cybrix (LOL !, a "former" botter) 's shield for 100 exalts and this with almost the same nickname in d2jsp and in poe. So , it leads to conclusion : With all their tools GGG can monitor this kind of transactions but they don't care much if you don't crash the server to exploit.


Same for the first to level 100 thing, it is a mascarade of competition As it is 1 player being carried by mates, providing rush/help at early stages ,sharing gears and bro deals to feed him with maps. At this point the aim of this "competition" should be renamed from "the first to reach level 100" to "The One with the best friends".

And the fact that people would rather pay to pass Malachai and the lab is showing the last contents are mostly useless and not enough interesting for players to do the whole game alone.

And don't listen the"omg poe is becoming diablo 3" "broken economy" "super uniques are too casual since perandus" etc... actually those guys are the first customers of this kind of services and they spend most of their time in the forum or in global chat, circlejerking about how their level 80 is using an "OP skill gem"and how GGG are bad at making video games etc...

Awesome! Looking forward to my first challenge :P

"

Reallysilent wrote:

"

Fightgarr wrote:

HALLELUJAH!

"

otinanai2 wrote:

And once again the SSF folks ignored. GGG you are shooting yourself in the foot when you constantly ignore 37% of your playerbase.

You have a point; a LOT of people voted for SSF. clearly there is some real demand for it, more than just a handful of Redditors as some of us thought. Clearly GGG should do a SSF league of some sort this year.

funny is back in d3 days same things were mentioned for self found league for that game even though getting an option (to trade) taken from a game or any other option that was previously in the game destroys any type game. D3 is currently a ghost town with less then 1 million players down from 16+ million original..... Because it went self found, the vocal/just complaining majority was listened to and the entire real player base was lost.

I play self found (mostly, 80% of chars) and sometimes when I feel like taking a shortcut and trade, sometimes just straight out trade from start. But best part out about is having the OPTION to decide on my own................

For the most part I play solo, self-found as I like to find my own items to take on the game. However, I wouldn't vote for or take part in a SSF league that had any length to it. With all the RNG, you have to trade. Period.

I always get into end-game with what I find. And then when I get lucky and find something godly, it's typically not for my build. So, I trade these drops to others that had the same thing happen to them. This what makes the game work.

Im SOOOO disapointed GGG didnt include SSF in this event.
Well, its just a 2week event.

What GGG really should do is make a new middle league.
We have SC and HC.
What about an SSF league where you dont really loose your char when dying, BUT loose ALL equipped gear and gear in pockets (not in stash) as well as it would be SSF (no trading or partying).
Maybee we could allow partying but no trading.
Or no that cant be done as it would mean trading as friends drop items if you drop chaos on ground.

But i feel that would be the best league ever, SSF with steep penaltying when dying (loose all gear).
It would certainly hurt when the 6-linked armour one worked for entire league goes away.

Isnt this a great idea or what?

(The reason for suggesting this is because this game sadly isnt stable enough for playing serious hardcore)

Good enough, although flashback with SSF would have been better.

'Each Asc class'... So if you play a Scion in this mini-league, it's 3x harder to win the prizes because they count all Scions as one Asc class while all other classes have three. And the GGG reps dodged every single question about this disparity in the previous threads.

Good job ignoring the issue! I wanted to play it as a Scion, but I'll pass on it rather than compete at a disadvantage like that.

Glad to see people did not vote for SSF, experience shows it gets stale quick. props for good judgement @community :)

"

Kelvynn wrote:

'Each Asc class'... So if you play a Scion in this mini-league, it's 3x harder to win the prizes because they count all Scions as one Asc class while all other classes have three. And the GGG reps dodged every single question about this disparity in the previous threads.

Good job ignoring the issue! I wanted to play it as a Scion, but I'll pass on it rather than compete at a disadvantage like that.

It could work if scions would get 3 times the normal amount of ascendancy points and if they had the option to choose multiple of the sub-classes of one class.

Really? More flashback?
Flashback is cool every now and again, but it is becoming more like again and again. Are you at least going to tone down beyond for act 4?

"

Kelvynn wrote:

'Each Asc class'... So if you play a Scion in this mini-league, it's 3x harder to win the prizes because they count all Scions as one Asc class while all other classes have three. And the GGG reps dodged every single question about this disparity in the previous threads.

Good job ignoring the issue! I wanted to play it as a Scion, but I'll pass on it rather than compete at a disadvantage like that.

How is it a disparity? There are now 19 classes in the game. Ignore base classes, they have no place in your argument. If you could be a duelist ascendant you argument might hold water but you cant so it doesnt.