Two-Week Flashback Perandus Events - The Votes Are In!

Nice.day 8-16 only for Aurora builds :-D
I don't care about cosmetic mtx. But I realize a lot of people do. So the problem with this 2 week competition is that it just isn't fair, and unless it's a SSF one, it will never be.

It's a bit disappointing to see GGG, while admirable in their willingness to listen to the community, once again basically saying: you like PoE, mtx prizes, and competitions but you're not part of the 0.1 percent that are cheating via rmt, or indirectly via a vast net of digital slaves? Well, then you can just fuck off and buy a lottery ticket, you've better odds of getting something there.
"
Exodus_820 wrote:
Try to push for lv 100 competitively in a flashback league not by doing solely gorges and then tell me it's easy. And btw I was top 10 in both 1 month flashback races and I never RMT.

Funny

You are telling me to play competitively while not playing competitively. Yet you are afraid of a real challange and playing SSF.

By the way, noone cares about top 10 anyway, the race is over after the first player reaches 100 unless there are rewards involved.
Were there rewards in the last flashback league? No.



"
Exodus_820 wrote:

If you think obtaining map pool and gear is hard that just means you are bad at it.

No, what i said is:
It is harder to obtain maps and gear, than facerolling the game.

"
Exodus_820 wrote:

... and I never RMT.

It's nice how you phrased that.

Look at me, i'am not a filthy RMT. But better i don't mention if i'am trading across leagues and/or use fake internet coins to trade. Better not.
Last edited by DasName#6192 on May 4, 2016, 5:04:24 AM
Well wanted SSF this time, played enought flashbacks in past, but ok - will play this event too, HC this time till i RIP :)

________________________
Immo_scion - Lv 100 solo - Playing in partys is too easy - solo for life :)
"
otinanai2 wrote:
And once again the SSF folks ignored. GGG you are shooting yourself in the foot when you constantly ignore 37% of your playerbase.

BTW it would be interesting if they released the results for HC and SC separately. My guess is that the HC players voted for SSF over flashback and most would prefer SSF+flashback together over simple flashback.


This!

SSF + flashback would be best.
@all those people crying.

If you need someone to make you play ssf you are the problem.

If you don't care about mtx prizes but bitch about it on the forums you are the problem.

If you can't make a mf toon that crushes content and makes loot rain like candy then you can always follow a guide. Hec I made over 300 ex last flashback league and didnt run a single map. NO I'm not a trader/flipper; I just converted alts/chromes to chaos and chaos to ex and used the chaos recipe.

And for the record I played a flame totem build. :D
If you want SSF, just play as if it's SSF just like the other 500 people did in Raiz' event.
"
Siochan wrote:
Where's the poll to keep or remove the lab? That's the real poll this game needs to do...


I will never understand comments like this....

Why should that happen? If u don't like it, don't play it. Simple. It's totally optional and not mandatory for the progress...
Why not TALISMAN ?? I don't get it.
Nice, can do some of the season's mods when I had not been playing back then !

About SSF :

PoE has been designed around trading in term of drops, even if this 2W race does not have self found ( because let's face it, 37ish % of the forum voters is probably far from being significant enough to end up being the last season's big event, it would drive away way too many people ! ), it tells GGG that there are SSF players, for potential future events.

The thing about SSF ( appart from the self satisfaction ), is that everything takes either more time, or more luck, basically.

Now, having a just solo event ( not self found ) would be different, and would certainly make more sense I think.
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info