Friday-Sunday Only - The Ember Mystery Box!

"

Mihalis wrote:

"

Nicksiren wrote:

And I believe you can use the supporter pack pets on all characters because you could theoretically only purchase 1 max. I'm assuming it's the same reasoning as to why the Awakening supporter pack weapon effects give an effect to both weapons if dual-wielding.

In my opinion its only fair for the price you pay for a MTX that should extend to all the microtransactions.

Every Pet works the same. Doesn't matter where you got it.

Yes, supporter pack weapon effects have the added value of applying it to the main weapon and getting the effect on the off-hand weapon too. That is, because there is only 1 effect in the pack and having to buy another pack just for a second effect is not reasonable.


MTX being too expansive is subjective.

pet pet pet and.. more pet's

The idea is not all that bad but no need for this many pets really more Inferno themed objects for hideout etc would of been prefered tbh, or a way to send pets to friends etc

also i think its abit expensive in the long run for when it comes to gamble, sure its how the game make its money but 4.5$ / box. and most of times ull recive something you dont need another of second of a pet etc.

Conspicuous absence of infernal basilisk in all these posted results. Has anyone been fortunate enough to get one of those out of the flaming boxes?

"

Sneakypaw wrote:

"

Mihalis wrote:

"

Nicksiren wrote:

And I believe you can use the supporter pack pets on all characters because you could theoretically only purchase 1 max. I'm assuming it's the same reasoning as to why the Awakening supporter pack weapon effects give an effect to both weapons if dual-wielding.

In my opinion its only fair for the price you pay for a MTX that should extend to all the microtransactions.

Every Pet works the same. Doesn't matter where you got it.

Yes, supporter pack weapon effects have the added value of applying it to the main weapon and getting the effect on the off-hand weapon too. That is, because there is only 1 effect in the pack and having to buy another pack just for a second effect is not reasonable.


MTX being too expansive is subjective.

I never bought a second pet so i wouldn't know.

I disagree with the multiple purchase of the same microtransaction to use to a different character though. The price of the microtransactions is subjective but i am simply saying its a wrong concept, especially with those that cost a lot, like an armor set. Paying more than $40 to get an armor set just for one character, is not fair according to my standards. Thats all i am saying. Forcing me to remove the microtransactions from one character in order to use them in another, feels more like punishment to me and i refuse to pay twice for the same thing, and no matter how you look at it, its paying more than once for the same microtransaction.

"

Mihalis wrote:

"

Sneakypaw wrote:

"

Mihalis wrote:

In my opinion its only fair for the price you pay for a MTX that should extend to all the microtransactions.

Every Pet works the same. Doesn't matter where you got it.

Yes, supporter pack weapon effects have the added value of applying it to the main weapon and getting the effect on the off-hand weapon too. That is, because there is only 1 effect in the pack and having to buy another pack just for a second effect is not reasonable.


MTX being too expansive is subjective.

I never bought a second pet so i wouldn't know.

I disagree with the multiple purchase of the same microtransaction to use to a different character though. The price of the microtransactions is subjective but i am simply saying its a wrong concept, especially with those that cost a lot, like an armor set. Paying more than $40 to get an armor set just for one character, is not fair according to my standards. Thats all i am saying. Forcing me to remove the microtransactions from one character in order to use them in another, feels more like punishment to me and i refuse to pay twice for the same thing, and no matter how you look at it, its paying more than once for the same microtransaction.

If they would make it so you can use mtx on all characters at the same time, they would have to make them even more expansive, because they would lose out on multiple sells.

Please no more RNG. :)

Always wanted that one :)

"

Sneakypaw wrote:

If they would make it so you can use mtx on all characters at the same time, they would have to make them even more expansive, because they would lose out on multiple sells.

Your point proves the false in the concept my friend. Instead they could make even more interesting transactions to sell. Which one would you prefer?

Please DO NOT make mtx tradable like almost everyone here wants.
It would be the biggest mistake ever since it would make the game definitely pay to win.. Like "Is it ok if I give you a scouring + infernal amour for your Acuity?" .. That would be nasty..

Still I don't understand why people are complaining so much about the dupes. Of course, some of them like pets are totally worthless once you already get one of them. But it's the meaning of gambling. It is up to you know when stop gambling. If you already got an Infernal Fox, just stop gambling.. You should know that if you get another one you'll lose 45 points.

On top of this, why people complain about Infernal Armour pieces? As someone said, even if you have armour/boots/helm/gloves equiprobable, you should get more or less 40 boxes in order to complete the set. 40*45=1800 points. So, if are you aiming to complete the set with these boxes, you should know that you would spend around this price. It is of course overpriced compared to the one that will be in 3 weeks.

Do you want the Infernal Armour right now? So overprice, but don't complain about it.
Do you want to gamble? At your own risk! But don't complain if you waste points.
None forces you to gamble or to "spend all or nothing". You can also gamble reasonably.

"

Mihalis wrote:

"

Sneakypaw wrote:

If they would make it so you can use mtx on all characters at the same time, they would have to make them even more expansive, because they would lose out on multiple sells.

Your point proves the false in the concept my friend. Instead they could make even more interesting transactions to sell. Which one would you prefer?

I don't even understand what you just said.

I am talking about pricing and you come with making more MTX?