What is your opinion about new globes?

"
Revy_Slan wrote:
"
DalaiLama wrote:
I do like the smaller footprint of the new orbs.


I don't get that at all. They're way too intrusive when compared to the previous ones. If you put the interfaces into separate tabs and switch between them you can see that, if it didn't strike you in the game itself.

Old (brown) http://i.imgur.com/BG9tcgW.jpg
1.0 (silver) http://i.imgur.com/N0OH4uo.jpg
Awakening (black) http://i.imgur.com/5R6lM0R.jpg

It's not only darker, but also much thicker, and not just the setting of the globes and the borders, but the shape of the figures themselves too. I didn't like the change before (there's no need to change the theme), but the way it is now I can't even ignore it, because the contrast, its presence, is so much stronger than before.



Never saw the Old (brown) ones before, i think they look better than their subsequent replacements. :)
Can i have an option to re-enable the chained ladies plz (or one of each gender, i'm not fussy), skulls are so very passe.
I do not like the change and would love to see an option to switch back. It does not effect direct game-play, but the feel of the game changes. The mood you know? I think get it, the skull represents life and death and the lion represents skill. But seriously, please let me change it back to how it was before. You could add a new ui theme every xpack or put them in your store. I would prolly buy another 60 dollar pack if it meant I could have the old ui back, and I am broke. This is my go to game when I work two/three jobs and have no light in my life. Please consider and option to change back.
I hope they change the new globes to two fat guys with curved shoulders, patchy beards,and greasy hair; bound by their wrists with burning bras while simultaneously getting whipped by Andrea Dworkin and stiff-armed by an attractive female.

Some of you will be offended by that comment on the grounds that it represents a cheap caricature of what your motives really are for holding the position you do on the matter. Sure, the kind of person I have in mind will pretend, after reading the first sentence of the second paragraph, that it didn't bother them, but it did. You might have tamped it down so as not to feel hoodwinked, but you felt something on the spectrum of contempt. You might think I somehow sympathize with people that use that kind of imagery to dismiss you. Why resort to that? It's not in the spirit of solving the issue at hand and doesn't contribute at all to furthering the argument, particularly if I don't happen to feel that way myself. With so little upside, why even invoke it?

Cash that out a little and you might start seeing where a reasonable opposing position starts getting some traction.
"
Disrupted wrote:

EDIT: getting stuff into spoiler because I realized it spoiled final battle :X
Spoiler

Yeah. So they had 2+ years of act 4 development, 2 month of this paid beta nonsense, many weeks of internal testing and two days before release they still have shitload of things not produced, left alone tested. This is... Well I don't know how to call this.
"
Old (brown) http://i.imgur.com/BG9tcgW.jpg
1.0 (silver) http://i.imgur.com/N0OH4uo.jpg
Awakening (black) http://i.imgur.com/5R6lM0R.jpg

/me Looks at the original one, oh sweet memories. Looks at new one. Cry.
In years to come
You hear my name
When darkness falls
On judgment day
sucks
zzz
I never watch the fuc*** globes till now, doesn't matter
"This Is A Buff" (Bex_GGG august 30, 2016)
Don't care, wouldn't even have noticed if people weren't making threads about it.
Nothing to see here.
Horseshit change
"
YurhedaSplode wrote:
I hope they change the new globes to two fat guys with curved shoulders, patchy beards,and greasy hair; bound by their wrists with burning bras while simultaneously getting whipped by Andrea Dworkin and stiff-armed by an attractive female.

Some of you will be offended by that comment on the grounds that it represents a cheap caricature of what your motives really are for holding the position you do on the matter. Sure, the kind of person I have in mind will pretend, after reading the first sentence of the second paragraph, that it didn't bother them, but it did. You might have tamped it down so as not to feel hoodwinked, but you felt something on the spectrum of contempt. You might think I somehow sympathize with people that use that kind of imagery to dismiss you. Why resort to that? It's not in the spirit of solving the issue at hand and doesn't contribute at all to furthering the argument, particularly if I don't happen to feel that way myself. With so little upside, why even invoke it?

Cash that out a little and you might start seeing where a reasonable opposing position starts getting some traction.


If you swapped the greasy hair & patchy beard for a goatee & a bald spot on top you would have a fairly accurate representation of myself so no problem there (and how did you guess about my sloped shoulders btw?!?). :)

As for the rest of your post; it's a bit over thought and angst ridden but that's your thoughts on the matter so no worries. :)
Can i have an option to re-enable the chained ladies plz (or one of each gender, i'm not fussy), skulls are so very passe.
first world problems.
couldn't care less

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info