Donald Trump and US politics

"

ImmaPokemon wrote:

Lol, asking for the option to pardon himself now? In other words, he admits to committing a crime and wants to make it go away with presidential power.

Do his supporters in this thread now admit he won because of Russian help?

I think I've read that you can only pardon someone found guilty, so yeah, he probably thinks he will be found guilty of something, of what only he can tell. If I had o bet I would put my money on money laundering (Maddow once reported on that possibility: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dy9Qtf3P6Nw).

"

ImmaPokemon wrote:

Do his supporters in this thread now admit he won because of Russian help?

Good luck proving that fam.

(hint: it's literally impossible)

"

Xavderion wrote:

"

ImmaPokemon wrote:

Do his supporters in this thread now admit he won because of Russian help?

Good luck proving that fam.

(hint: it's literally impossible)

You just have to prove it could be possible. How Russian help can translate into votes. Not that hard with a small margin. I could but I wouldn't. It doesn't do anything.

*roll eyes*

You know what people could do? Make more Trump jokes.

"

Schmodderhengst wrote:

You do realize that neither Isis nor the Syrian government need any U.S. support, they have enough money and support from elsewhere.

Stop mixing everything up. The covert CIA program wasn't helping ISIS, but the "moderate islamists", who have ties with al-Qaeda groups and turned out to be more or less the same garbage as ISIS:

U.S.-Backed ‘Moderate’ Rebels Behead a Child Near Aleppo

"

Schmodderhengst wrote:

Hey but stick to your narrative of "all muslims are extremists", maybe some Dumbos believe it.

Maybe you should stop lying, projecting and imagining things.

"

morbo wrote:

"

Schmodderhengst wrote:

You do realize that neither Isis nor the Syrian government need any U.S. support, they have enough money and support from elsewhere.

Stop mixing everything up. The covert CIA program wasn't helping ISIS, but the "moderate islamists", who have ties with al-Qaeda groups and turned out to be more or less the same garbage as ISIS:

U.S.-Backed ‘Moderate’ Rebels Behead a Child Near Aleppo

"

Schmodderhengst wrote:

Hey but stick to your narrative of "all muslims are extremists", maybe some Dumbos believe it.

Maybe you should stop lying, projecting and imagining things.

There is a bunch of different groups in Syrian. As opposite to the narrative, that these groups are peaceful and fighting a dictator, some of these groups are armed, violence and dangerous, are killing civilians. That is right from the beginning. How come nobody talk about this? Assad is dangerous and these rebels are not? That is ludicrous. It is only when these rebel group degenerate further as the Syrian civil war continue that people recognize that problem.

"

deathflower wrote:

You just have to prove it could be possible.

That's not proof. By this logic he won because I shilled for him on the internet.

------------------
Edit:
The idiocy is staggering:

https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/888218427013423104

How can one think that this analogy makes Trump look good?

"

Xavderion wrote:

"

deathflower wrote:

You just have to prove it could be possible.

That's not proof. By this logic he won because I shilled for him on the internet.

OK, sure. You are only the foot note, Hillary and the Media are his REAL accomplices.

"

deathflower wrote:

There is a bunch of different groups in Syrian. As opposite to the narrative, that these groups are peaceful and fighting a dictator, some of these groups are armed, violence and dangerous, are killing civilians. That is right from the beginning. How come nobody talk about this? Assad is dangerous and these rebels are not? That is ludicrous. It is only when these rebel group degenerate further as the Syrian civil war continue that people recognize that problem.

You don't need to explain this to me. The western media elites were spreading the Pentagon/CIA propaganda of "moderate islamists" since the start. Some still talk about the moderate islamist opposition, even now, when it should be very obvious that all these (non-ISIS) armed groups are radicals too, with many of them having ties to al-Qaeda. And Obama was sponsoring these shady figures, because he hoped they'll manage to topple Assad. (at what cost, it didn't matter)

The only non-radical group in (kind of) opposition to Assad are the Kurds, and even that's a stretch, since they have ties to PKK terrorists in Turkey.

Why does MSM not talk about it? Because they are paid to not talk. I'm puzzled why there are still people out there who believe the MSM corporate liars? When it's so fvkin obvious that MSM are pro-war shills and have been since I remember.

Morbo, again you´re saying, that´s representative....