Donald Trump and US politics

Whos protecting Christians and other secs in the middles east? Muslims thats who. While USA tries to overthrow the protectors. Like saddam and assad.


[Removed by Support]

Christians druze jews and other survived 1400 years of Islam...will they survive neocons ...not so much

do you know any muslims personally?

[Removed by Support]

1. I know many Muslims personaly
2. I am not clueless it's not because some people have different opinion than yours that they are wrong... grow up.
3. I am against violence.

Damn... those mods are censoring the fuck out of Aim_Deep.

"

soneka101 wrote:

It's is said that the "Li-ion King" John B. Goodenough(The guy that invented the ion batteries that we use today on our smartphones notebooks and etc...) along with Helena Braga invented a new type of battery made of glass. Some people are skeptical because it seems too good to be true and also because it seems the research lab is not releasing all the info about it, but it's testament that people are trying hard to find better ways to store energy.

It isn't a matter of being able to store more. Capacitor storage can easily exceed batteries. The smaller gap/tighter you can make the plates, the more energy you can store, and industry is good at making things smaller with better tolerances.

It's a matter of being able to safely store more. As we have already seen with cell phones, lap tops and a few airline fires, batteries can catch fire. The more energy you store in them, or take out at a time, the higher their temperature gets. Think of batteries/capacitors as energy per cubic mm devices. The higher that number gets, the more like a bomb they become. This is basic chemistry and physics, and technology won't overcome the energy vs stability dilemma.

Could we get to the point where electrically powered transport is more cost efficient than gasoline? Yes, but only if there's a commitment to streamlining the technology and no proprietary compatibility issues, so that economies of scale can bring it to the public.

It is doable, but governments and industries need to establish ground rules and long term planning structures.

"

Donnerdrummel wrote:

Should a black sheep publish phony findings, those things would most likely been tested and disproved.

It isn't one or two black sheep. It's a top to bottom cult buy in. If you have a master's degree and want to pursue a Phd, then you agree with whatever the politically correct stance is, or you will not make it through the program. This is true in the social sciences as well as the physical sciences.

Look at the Democratic party or the Republican party. When they do something unusual, is it openly tested and disproved by their party, or does the questioning come from the opposition party? The same thing is happening in science, except that there is no opposition party.

"

Donnerdrummel wrote:

Look at the science scandals of the past. the korean clone-doctor, for instance. Noone could reproduce what he did, sceptiscism arose, he was exposed. This is a great mechanism, it is open to anyone, it protecs the integrity of science and helps to grow knowledge.

Falsifiable is the term - there must be a way for others to test the hypothesis and potentially prove it false. In the case of historical data, you can't go back and repeat history. What they can do is ask for the raw data to study. In the case of climate studies, we have refusal to share raw data to verify studies. We have deletion of raw data, and we have falsification of raw data, just as with the clone doctor and with cold fusion. If science were working properly, current theories of Climate change would have been exposed as fraudulent and the guilty scientists removed from the community.

"

Donnerdrummel wrote:

Again, what you are doing is that you prefer to assume that vast numbers of scientists all lie to make a living, that a complex conspiracy thrives and yes, not only scientists are into it, but law enforecement and judges, too.

Think about what you just said. How many judges are involved in quantum chromodynamics? How many law enforcement officials are making sure that Coulomb's law isn't being violated. Since when were elementary teachers marching about the Dark Energy deniers and how the MOND (Modified Newtonian dynamics)are endangering our universe? That so many people are involved, tells you it is political, not scientific. When you are older and can look back and see how some of these predictions have played out - say over the next 30 years - you will form a vastly different opinion than you hold now. VASTLY DIFFERENT.

In the meantime, since we don't have a time machine handy, you can do some research on
Maragatham Chandrasekar's theories and how politics in the scientific community made his ideas unacceptable for a long period. If you are having trouble finding the key players, look for when Chandrasekar's ideas began to be widely accepted and who died immediately beforehand.

"

Donnerdrummel wrote:

because, if what you were are saying was true, then there would be tenthousands of people breaking the law, lying, fabricating evidence to get grants, etc.

Let's say I'm a scientist studying axe murders. They still happen, so I don't need to lie about them. They don't happen as frequently as other types, so if I want to get any substantial research dollars, I'm going to have to find a way to convince the public that axe murders are a real concern. So let's say we had 1 axe murder (2005) and 1 in 2008 from 2000 to 2010. Now in 2012, we have a guy that commits 2 axe murders, so I publish a study in 2013 saying that in the current decade, Axe murders are up 500%. (2 per 2 years - so 10 in 10 years /2 per 10 years. I further sensationalize it by saying that ALL axe murders committed THIS decade involved hacking homeless people to death and the murderer eating the victims eyes and brains. I say that there will be more brain eating in the future if we don't deal with ax murder NOW. My facts are technically correct. My interpretation is not. If I showed you my data and you found it was based off of One killer with a grisly M.O. then you could call BS. Unfortunately, I won't share my data, and if investigated I will delete the data or alter it. Furthermore, I will call you an Axe Murder Denier and publicly shame you. I will claim that you are OK with axe murder, and that Axe companies must be paying you.

Celebrities will ridicule you for your Axe murder denial. College professors will flunk you in class. You may even get fired from your job for Axe murder denial. When this is widespread and the elementary teachers are teaching people Axe Murder theory, then everyone would be involved - judges, legal officials etc. Everywhere you look will be people who strongly believe in Axe Murder theory and believe it was wrong for Trump to withdraw from the Paris anti-Ax murder agreements.

Here's a quick test - take 10 people you know that you think are well informed on Climate Change. Ask them what was in the Paris Accord, and for some specific details. Do they know, or are they just parroting others' opinions?

"

Donnerdrummel wrote:

Yes, there is money, huge amounts of money, and there has been for quite some time money to be made, and, more importantly, money to be lost. By whom, you do not ask? Well, by all those who preferred to keep on with their current business model, because it was working out for them. Thats the fossil fuel industry

So why were fossil fuel companies supporting the Paris accord again? Are they thumb wrestling with themselves?

Let's say that I proclaim that cheating in a game called Math of Exiles is a terrible thing, so terrible that we need to pass laws and sign an accord in Paris where entire nations are put under anti-cheating laws and taxes. Now, let's say I privately cheat at Math of Exiles. It isn't that I use an abacus instead of pen and paper to do the math. It isn't that I use a calculator. Let's say I use a warehouse full of dedicated math servers to cheat. What would you think of my stated position then?

What if I said climate change was bad, fossil fuels are horrible, we need more mass transportation, solar power .... yada yada yada, but I flew to a climate change convention in my own private plane?

What if 1700 of us did?

"1,700 Private Jets Fly to Davos to Discuss Global Warming"
"The influx of private jets is so great, the Swiss Armed Forces has been forced to open up a military air base for the first time ever to absorb all the super rich flying their private jets into the event, reports Newsweek."

I can see that your position is based on trusting the scientific community as a whole. If you trust them completely, then only their consensus words will matter to you. Whether your faith in them is justifiable will be shown over time. Start to save web pages where predictions are made - predictions with measurable numbers and time frames. In 5 -10 years look back and see how they played out.

If you have extra time - dig into the Eugenics movement, the people involved, who they influenced, the scientists involved, the politics, the theories etc. Now follow them through history. Guess who they became?

Climate Change

"

DalaiLama wrote:

It isn't a matter of being able to store more. Capacitor storage can easily exceed batteries. The smaller gap/tighter you can make the plates, the more energy you can store, and industry is good at making things smaller with better tolerances.

It's a matter of being able to safely store more. As we have already seen with cell phones, lap tops and a few airline fires, batteries can catch fire. The more energy you store in them, or take out at a time, the higher their temperature gets. Think of batteries/capacitors as energy per cubic mm devices. The higher that number gets, the more like a bomb they become. This is basic chemistry and physics, and technology won't overcome the energy vs stability dilemma.

Could we get to the point where electrically powered transport is more cost efficient than gasoline? Yes, but only if there's a commitment to streamlining the technology and no proprietary compatibility issues, so that economies of scale can bring it to the public.

It is doable, but governments and industries need to establish ground rules and long term planning structures.

That battery that Goodenough and Braga might have invented is solid state, and I don't know how it works exactly, but I know it doesn't blow up.

I think someone already came up with a solid state battery before this one, but that one had to be kept at a high temperature if I'm not wrong, while this one can go down to -20 degrees Celsius (or -4 Fahrenheit).

"

Wraeclastian wrote:

Damn... those mods are censoring the fuck out of Aim_Deep.

yes because in these forum you can call religion stupid but not those who criticize. I have news for you guys Islam is over 1400 years old it's not going anywhere. In fact it's growing. Get used to it.

"

Aim_Deep wrote:

"

Wraeclastian wrote:

Damn... those mods are censoring the fuck out of Aim_Deep.

yes because in these forum you can call religion stupid but not those who criticize. I have news for you guys Islam is over 1400 years old it's not going anywhere. In fact it's growing. Get used to it.

They found cancer traces on Prehistoric skeletons.
it s that old but doesn t mean we should not find a cure for it.

"

lolozori wrote:

"

Aim_Deep wrote:

"

Wraeclastian wrote:

Damn... those mods are censoring the fuck out of Aim_Deep.

yes because in these forum you can call religion stupid but not those who criticize. I have news for you guys Islam is over 1400 years old it's not going anywhere. In fact it's growing. Get used to it.

They found cancer traces on Prehistoric skeletons.
it s that old but doesn t mean we should not find a cure for it.

did you just compare Islam to cancer?


lol I'm sorry Aim_Deep babe.... but religions are ideology and ideology are a set of ideas, and ideas are made to be criticized. There is nothing wrong about critic.

example: I think it's bad stoning a woman because she did not follow the lead of her husband, this lead women into something similar to slavery.

I think it is wrong to push gay people in a cliff to their death just because they are gay, I think it's barbaric and have no place in our society.

I think it is wrong to encourage terrorism and any sort of violence.

See? this is why I disagree with Islam.

Being fake news also means simply not covering essential stuff.